Examination of the utility of the COVID-19 detection kit, TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i for nasopharyngeal swabs.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Satoru Ishii, Moto Kimura, Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama, Ataru Moriya, Masami Kurokawa, Erina Isaka, Junko Terada-Hirashima, Jin Takasaki, Shinyu Izumi, Masayuki Hojo, Haruhito Sugiyama
{"title":"Examination of the utility of the COVID-19 detection kit, TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i for nasopharyngeal swabs.","authors":"Satoru Ishii,&nbsp;Moto Kimura,&nbsp;Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama,&nbsp;Ataru Moriya,&nbsp;Masami Kurokawa,&nbsp;Erina Isaka,&nbsp;Junko Terada-Hirashima,&nbsp;Jin Takasaki,&nbsp;Shinyu Izumi,&nbsp;Masayuki Hojo,&nbsp;Haruhito Sugiyama","doi":"10.5582/ddt.2022.01106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) offers high sensitivity, but has some drawbacks, such as the time required for the RNA extraction. Transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction (TRC) Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i is easy to use and can be performed in about 40 minutes. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i and real-time one-step RT-PCR using the TaqMan probe tests of cryopreserved nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were compared. The primary objective was to examine the positive and negative concordance rates. A total of 69 samples cryopreserved at -80° C were examined. Of the 37 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR positive, 35 were positive by the RT-PCR method. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i detected 33 positive cases and 2 negative cases. One frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was negative on both TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i and RT-PCR. In addition, one frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was positive by the RT-PCR method and negative by TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i. Of the 32 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR negative, both the RT-PCR method and TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i yielded negative results for all 32 samples. Compared with RT-PCR, TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i had a positive concordance rate of 94.3% and a negative concordance rate of 97.1%. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i can be utilized in a wide range of medical sites such as clinics and community hospitals due to its ease of operability, and is expected to be useful in infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":47494,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","volume":"17 2","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2022.01106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) offers high sensitivity, but has some drawbacks, such as the time required for the RNA extraction. Transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction (TRC) Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i is easy to use and can be performed in about 40 minutes. TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i and real-time one-step RT-PCR using the TaqMan probe tests of cryopreserved nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were compared. The primary objective was to examine the positive and negative concordance rates. A total of 69 samples cryopreserved at -80° C were examined. Of the 37 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR positive, 35 were positive by the RT-PCR method. TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i detected 33 positive cases and 2 negative cases. One frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was negative on both TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i and RT-PCR. In addition, one frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was positive by the RT-PCR method and negative by TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i. Of the 32 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR negative, both the RT-PCR method and TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i yielded negative results for all 32 samples. Compared with RT-PCR, TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i had a positive concordance rate of 94.3% and a negative concordance rate of 97.1%. TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i can be utilized in a wide range of medical sites such as clinics and community hospitals due to its ease of operability, and is expected to be useful in infection control.

检验COVID-19检测试剂盒TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i用于鼻咽拭子的实用性。
逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)具有高灵敏度,但也存在一些缺点,如RNA提取所需的时间。转录逆转录协同反应(TRC) Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i易于使用,可在约40分钟内完成。比较了诊断为COVID-19的患者冷冻保存的鼻咽拭子样本的TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i和使用TaqMan探针检测的实时一步RT-PCR。主要目的是检查阳性和阴性的一致性率。在-80°C低温保存的样品共69个。在预期为RT-PCR阳性的37个冷冻样本中,35个通过RT-PCR方法呈阳性。TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i检测到33例阳性病例和2例阴性病例。一份预计RT-PCR阳性的冷冻样本在TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i和RT-PCR上均呈阴性。此外,一份预计为RT-PCR阳性的冷冻样本经RT-PCR方法检测为阳性,而经TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i检测为阴性。在32份预计为RT-PCR阴性的冷冻样本中,RT-PCR方法和TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i检测均为阴性。与RT-PCR相比,TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i阳性符合率为94.3%,阴性符合率为97.1%。TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i由于易于操作,可广泛用于诊所和社区医院等医疗场所,并有望在感染控制方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信