Prognostic value of metabolic parameters measured by first responders attending patients with severe trauma: associations with the New Injury Severity Score and mortality.

Ervigio Corral Torres, Alberto Hernández-Tejedor, Pablo Millán Estañ, Marcos Valiente Fernández, María Bringas Bollada, Dolores Pérez Díaz, Fernando Monforte-Escobar, Javier Vejo Gutiérrez, Lidia Orejón García, Ana Delgado Pascual, Cristina Rey Valcárcel, Carmen Camacho Leis
{"title":"Prognostic value of metabolic parameters measured by first responders attending patients with severe trauma: associations with the New Injury Severity Score and mortality.","authors":"Ervigio Corral Torres, Alberto Hernández-Tejedor, Pablo Millán Estañ, Marcos Valiente Fernández, María Bringas Bollada, Dolores Pérez Díaz, Fernando Monforte-Escobar, Javier Vejo Gutiérrez, Lidia Orejón García, Ana Delgado Pascual, Cristina Rey Valcárcel, Carmen Camacho Leis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with severe or potentially severe trauma must be identified early, a challenge in prehospital settings. This study aimed to analyze the possible diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of analytical markers recorded in the early moments of care.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Observational study of information extracted from the prospective multicenter Code Trauma database for 2016-2019, excluding data for isolated head injuries. Using the New Injury Severity Score (NISS), we classified cases into 4 levels of severity. NISS and mortality were considered the dependent variables in inferential analyses. We calculated the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves, identified optimal cutoff points (Youden index), and calculated positive (PPV) and negative predictive values..</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1039 trauma patients in the registry, 709 were included in the study. Their mean (SD) age was 40.4 (17.3) years, and 77.3% were men. Motorcycle accidents were the most common causes of trauma (in 21%), and mortality was 12.1%. Lactate concentration, pH, PCO2, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, and blood sugar were significantly associated with severity and mortality. The PPVs corresponding to pH for the 4 NISS score groups (34-41, 42-49, 50-59, and $ 60) and mortality, respectively, were 61.2, 64.1, 70.7, 62.2, and 66.6. The PPVs of traditionally used clinical variables were lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with more severe trauma had lower pH values and higher PCO2, lactate, and base excess values. PCO2, pH, and blood sugar findings were the best predictors of severity. Metabolic variables are better predictors than traditionally recorded hemodynamic variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 2","pages":"90-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with severe or potentially severe trauma must be identified early, a challenge in prehospital settings. This study aimed to analyze the possible diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of analytical markers recorded in the early moments of care.

Material and methods: Observational study of information extracted from the prospective multicenter Code Trauma database for 2016-2019, excluding data for isolated head injuries. Using the New Injury Severity Score (NISS), we classified cases into 4 levels of severity. NISS and mortality were considered the dependent variables in inferential analyses. We calculated the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves, identified optimal cutoff points (Youden index), and calculated positive (PPV) and negative predictive values..

Results: Of the 1039 trauma patients in the registry, 709 were included in the study. Their mean (SD) age was 40.4 (17.3) years, and 77.3% were men. Motorcycle accidents were the most common causes of trauma (in 21%), and mortality was 12.1%. Lactate concentration, pH, PCO2, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, and blood sugar were significantly associated with severity and mortality. The PPVs corresponding to pH for the 4 NISS score groups (34-41, 42-49, 50-59, and $ 60) and mortality, respectively, were 61.2, 64.1, 70.7, 62.2, and 66.6. The PPVs of traditionally used clinical variables were lower.

Conclusion: Patients with more severe trauma had lower pH values and higher PCO2, lactate, and base excess values. PCO2, pH, and blood sugar findings were the best predictors of severity. Metabolic variables are better predictors than traditionally recorded hemodynamic variables.

严重创伤患者急救人员测量的代谢参数的预后价值:与新伤严重程度评分和死亡率的关联。
目标:必须及早发现严重或潜在严重创伤患者,这在院前环境中是一项挑战。本研究旨在分析早期救治过程中记录的分析指标可能对诊断和预后的作用:对2016-2019年从前瞻性多中心创伤代码数据库中提取的信息进行观察研究,不包括孤立头部损伤的数据。通过新损伤严重程度评分(NISS),我们将病例分为4个严重程度等级。在推理分析中,NISS 和死亡率被视为因变量。我们计算了接收者操作特征曲线下的面积,确定了最佳截断点(尤登指数),并计算了阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值:在登记在册的 1039 名创伤患者中,有 709 人被纳入研究。他们的平均(标清)年龄为 40.4(17.3)岁,77.3% 为男性。摩托车事故是最常见的外伤原因(占 21%),死亡率为 12.1%。乳酸浓度、pH 值、PCO2、血红蛋白浓度、血细胞比容和血糖与创伤严重程度和死亡率有显著相关性。4 个 NISS 评分组(34-41、42-49、50-59 和 60 美元)与 pH 值相对应的 PPV 值和死亡率分别为 61.2、64.1、70.7、62.2 和 66.6。传统临床变量的PPV较低:结论:严重创伤患者的 pH 值较低,PCO2、乳酸和碱过量值较高。PCO2、pH 值和血糖结果是预测严重程度的最佳指标。与传统的血液动力学变量相比,代谢变量是更好的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信