Stretching and muscle-performance exercises for chronic nonspecific neck pain: who may benefit most?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2207103
Amira Daher, Gali Dar
{"title":"Stretching and muscle-performance exercises for chronic nonspecific neck pain: who may benefit most?","authors":"Amira Daher, Gali Dar","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2207103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although exercise is the mainstay of treatment for neck pain (NP), uncertainty remains over optimal decision-making concerning who may benefit most from such, particularly in the long term.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the subgroup of patients with nonspecific NP most likely to benefit from stretching and muscle-performance exercises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of treatment outcomes of 70 patients (10 of whom dropped out) with a primary complaint of nonspecific NP in one treatment arm of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. All patients performed the exercises, twice weekly for 6 weeks, and a home exercise program. Blinded outcome measurements were collected at baseline, after the 6-week program, and at a 6-month follow-up. Patients rated their perceived recovery on a 15-point global rating of change scale; a rating of \"quite a bit better\" (+5) or higher was defined as a successful outcome. Clinical predictor variables were developed via logistic regression analysis to classify patients with NP that may benefit from exercise-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NP duration since onset≤6 months, no cervicogenic headache, and shoulder protraction were independent predictor variables. The pretest probability of success was 47% after the 6-week intervention and 40% at the 6-month follow-up. The corresponding posttest probabilities of success for participants with all three variables were 86% and 71%, respectively; such participants were likely to recover.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical predictor variables developed in this study may identify patients with nonspecific NP likely to benefit most from stretching and muscle-performance exercises in the short and long terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2207103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although exercise is the mainstay of treatment for neck pain (NP), uncertainty remains over optimal decision-making concerning who may benefit most from such, particularly in the long term.

Objective: To identify the subgroup of patients with nonspecific NP most likely to benefit from stretching and muscle-performance exercises.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of treatment outcomes of 70 patients (10 of whom dropped out) with a primary complaint of nonspecific NP in one treatment arm of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. All patients performed the exercises, twice weekly for 6 weeks, and a home exercise program. Blinded outcome measurements were collected at baseline, after the 6-week program, and at a 6-month follow-up. Patients rated their perceived recovery on a 15-point global rating of change scale; a rating of "quite a bit better" (+5) or higher was defined as a successful outcome. Clinical predictor variables were developed via logistic regression analysis to classify patients with NP that may benefit from exercise-based treatment.

Results: NP duration since onset≤6 months, no cervicogenic headache, and shoulder protraction were independent predictor variables. The pretest probability of success was 47% after the 6-week intervention and 40% at the 6-month follow-up. The corresponding posttest probabilities of success for participants with all three variables were 86% and 71%, respectively; such participants were likely to recover.

Conclusion: The clinical predictor variables developed in this study may identify patients with nonspecific NP likely to benefit most from stretching and muscle-performance exercises in the short and long terms.

慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的拉伸和肌肉功能锻炼:谁最受益?
背景:尽管运动是治疗颈部疼痛(NP)的主要方法,但关于谁最有可能从运动中获益,尤其是长期获益的最佳决策仍存在不确定性:确定最有可能从伸展运动和肌肉表现运动中获益的非特异性颈痛患者亚群:这是对一项前瞻性随机对照试验的一个治疗组中 70 名主诉为非特异性 NP 的患者(其中 10 人退出)的治疗结果进行的二次分析。所有患者都进行了锻炼,每周两次,持续6周,并进行了家庭锻炼计划。在基线、6 周计划结束后和 6 个月的随访中收集了盲测结果。患者根据 15 分的总体变化评分表对自己的恢复情况进行评分;评分达到或超过 "好了很多"(+5)即为成功。通过逻辑回归分析得出临床预测变量,对可能从运动治疗中获益的 NP 患者进行分类:结果:NP发病时间≤6个月、无颈源性头痛和肩关节前伸是独立的预测变量。在为期6周的干预后,测试前的成功概率为47%,6个月随访时的成功概率为40%。具有这三个变量的参与者在测试后的成功概率分别为86%和71%;这些参与者很有可能康复:本研究开发的临床预测变量可确定非特异性 NP 患者在短期和长期内最有可能从拉伸和肌肉表现练习中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信