Quantifying Distances Between Non-Elliptical Clusters to Enhance the Identification of Meaningful Emotional Reactivity Subtypes.

Data science in science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-18 DOI:10.1080/26941899.2022.2157349
M L Wallace, L McTeague, J L Graves, N Kissel, C Tortora, B Wheeler, S Iyengar
{"title":"Quantifying Distances Between Non-Elliptical Clusters to Enhance the Identification of Meaningful Emotional Reactivity Subtypes.","authors":"M L Wallace, L McTeague, J L Graves, N Kissel, C Tortora, B Wheeler, S Iyengar","doi":"10.1080/26941899.2022.2157349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coordinated emotional responses across psychophysiological and subjective indices is a cornerstone of adaptive emotional functioning. Using clustering to identify cross-diagnostic subgroups with similar emotion response profiles may suggest novel underlying mechanisms and treatments.However, many psychophysiological measures are non-normal even in homogenous samples, and over-reliance on traditional elliptical clustering approaches may inhibit the identification of meaningful subgroups. Finite mixture models that allow for non-elliptical cluster distributions is an emerging methodological field that may overcome this hurdle. Furthermore, succinctly quantifying pairwise cluster separation could enhance the clinical utility of the clustering solutions. However, a comprehensive examination of distance measures in the context of elliptical and non-elliptical model-based clustering is needed to provide practical guidance on the computation, benefits, and disadvantages of existing measures. We summarize several measures that can quantify the multivariate distance between two clusters and suggest practical computational tools. Through a simulation study, we evaluate the measures across three scenarios that allow for clusters to differ in location, scale, skewness, and rotation. We then demonstrate our approaches using psychophysiological and subjective responses to emotional imagery captured through the Transdiagnostic Anxiety Study. Finally, we synthesize findings to provide guidance on how to use distance measures in clustering applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72770,"journal":{"name":"Data science in science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data science in science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26941899.2022.2157349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coordinated emotional responses across psychophysiological and subjective indices is a cornerstone of adaptive emotional functioning. Using clustering to identify cross-diagnostic subgroups with similar emotion response profiles may suggest novel underlying mechanisms and treatments.However, many psychophysiological measures are non-normal even in homogenous samples, and over-reliance on traditional elliptical clustering approaches may inhibit the identification of meaningful subgroups. Finite mixture models that allow for non-elliptical cluster distributions is an emerging methodological field that may overcome this hurdle. Furthermore, succinctly quantifying pairwise cluster separation could enhance the clinical utility of the clustering solutions. However, a comprehensive examination of distance measures in the context of elliptical and non-elliptical model-based clustering is needed to provide practical guidance on the computation, benefits, and disadvantages of existing measures. We summarize several measures that can quantify the multivariate distance between two clusters and suggest practical computational tools. Through a simulation study, we evaluate the measures across three scenarios that allow for clusters to differ in location, scale, skewness, and rotation. We then demonstrate our approaches using psychophysiological and subjective responses to emotional imagery captured through the Transdiagnostic Anxiety Study. Finally, we synthesize findings to provide guidance on how to use distance measures in clustering applications.

量化非椭圆聚类之间的距离,加强对有意义的情绪反应亚型的识别。
心理生理学和主观指标之间协调的情绪反应是适应性情绪功能的基石。然而,即使在同质样本中,许多心理生理学测量指标也是非正态的,过度依赖传统的椭圆聚类方法可能会妨碍识别有意义的亚组。允许非椭圆聚类分布的有限混合模型是一个新兴的方法领域,可以克服这一障碍。此外,简洁量化成对聚类分离可提高聚类解决方案的临床实用性。然而,需要对基于椭圆和非椭圆模型聚类的距离测量方法进行全面研究,以便为现有测量方法的计算、优点和缺点提供实用指导。我们总结了几种可以量化两个聚类之间多元距离的测量方法,并提出了实用的计算工具。通过模拟研究,我们在三种情况下对这些测量方法进行了评估,这三种情况允许聚类在位置、规模、偏度和旋转方面存在差异。然后,我们利用跨诊断焦虑研究(Transdiagnostic Anxiety Study)捕捉到的情绪意象的心理生理和主观反应来演示我们的方法。最后,我们对研究结果进行总结,为如何在聚类应用中使用距离测量法提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信