A machine learning study of COVID-19 serology and molecular tests and predictions

Q2 Health Professions
Magdalyn E. Elkin, Xingquan Zhu
{"title":"A machine learning study of COVID-19 serology and molecular tests and predictions","authors":"Magdalyn E. Elkin,&nbsp;Xingquan Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Serology and molecular tests are the two most commonly used methods for rapid COVID-19 infection testing. The two types of tests have different mechanisms to detect infection, by measuring the presence of viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA (molecular test) or detecting the presence of antibodies triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (serology test). A handful of studies have shown that symptoms, combined with demographic and/or diagnosis features, can be helpful for the prediction of COVID-19 test outcomes. However, due to nature of the test, serology and molecular tests vary significantly. There is no existing study on the correlation between serology and molecular tests, and what type of symptoms are the key factors indicating the COVID-19 positive tests.</p><p>In this study, we propose a machine learning based approach to study serology and molecular tests, and use features to predict test outcomes. A total of 2,467 donors, each tested using one or multiple types of COVID-19 tests, are collected as our testbed. By cross checking test types and results, we study correlation between serology and molecular tests. For test outcome prediction, we label 2,467 donors as positive or negative, by using their serology or molecular test results, and create symptom features to represent each donor for learning. Because COVID-19 produces a wide range of symptoms and the data collection process is essentially error prone, we group similar symptoms into bins. This decreases the feature space and sparsity. Using binned symptoms, combined with demographic features, we train five classification algorithms to predict COVID-19 test results. Experiments show that XGBoost achieves the best performance with 76.85% accuracy and 81.4% AUC scores, demonstrating that symptoms are indeed helpful for predicting COVID-19 test outcomes. Our study investigates the relationship between serology and molecular tests, identifies meaningful symptom features associated with COVID-19 infection, and also provides a way for rapid screening and cost effective detection of COVID-19 infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37151,"journal":{"name":"Smart Health","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583626/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648322000654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Serology and molecular tests are the two most commonly used methods for rapid COVID-19 infection testing. The two types of tests have different mechanisms to detect infection, by measuring the presence of viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA (molecular test) or detecting the presence of antibodies triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (serology test). A handful of studies have shown that symptoms, combined with demographic and/or diagnosis features, can be helpful for the prediction of COVID-19 test outcomes. However, due to nature of the test, serology and molecular tests vary significantly. There is no existing study on the correlation between serology and molecular tests, and what type of symptoms are the key factors indicating the COVID-19 positive tests.

In this study, we propose a machine learning based approach to study serology and molecular tests, and use features to predict test outcomes. A total of 2,467 donors, each tested using one or multiple types of COVID-19 tests, are collected as our testbed. By cross checking test types and results, we study correlation between serology and molecular tests. For test outcome prediction, we label 2,467 donors as positive or negative, by using their serology or molecular test results, and create symptom features to represent each donor for learning. Because COVID-19 produces a wide range of symptoms and the data collection process is essentially error prone, we group similar symptoms into bins. This decreases the feature space and sparsity. Using binned symptoms, combined with demographic features, we train five classification algorithms to predict COVID-19 test results. Experiments show that XGBoost achieves the best performance with 76.85% accuracy and 81.4% AUC scores, demonstrating that symptoms are indeed helpful for predicting COVID-19 test outcomes. Our study investigates the relationship between serology and molecular tests, identifies meaningful symptom features associated with COVID-19 infection, and also provides a way for rapid screening and cost effective detection of COVID-19 infection.

Abstract Image

COVID-19血清学和分子检测与预测的机器学习研究
血清学和分子检测是快速检测COVID-19感染最常用的两种方法。这两种类型的检测具有不同的检测感染的机制,通过测量病毒SARS-CoV-2 RNA的存在(分子检测)或检测由SARS-CoV-2病毒触发的抗体的存在(血清学检测)。少数研究表明,症状与人口统计学和/或诊断特征相结合,可能有助于预测COVID-19检测结果。然而,由于测试的性质,血清学和分子测试差异很大。目前尚无血清学与分子检测的相关性研究,以及哪些症状类型是新冠病毒阳性检测的关键因素。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种基于机器学习的方法来研究血清学和分子测试,并使用特征来预测测试结果。共有2467名捐赠者接受了一种或多种COVID-19检测,作为我们的试验平台。通过交叉核对检测类型和结果,研究血清学检测与分子检测的相关性。对于测试结果预测,我们使用血清学或分子测试结果将2467名供体标记为阳性或阴性,并创建症状特征来代表每个供体以供学习。由于COVID-19会产生各种各样的症状,而且数据收集过程基本上很容易出错,因此我们将类似的症状分组。这减少了特征空间和稀疏性。利用分类症状,结合人口统计学特征,我们训练了五种分类算法来预测COVID-19检测结果。实验表明,XGBoost的准确率为76.85%,AUC得分为81.4%,达到了最佳性能,这表明症状确实有助于预测COVID-19测试结果。我们的研究探讨了血清学和分子检测之间的关系,发现了与COVID-19感染相关的有意义的症状特征,也为COVID-19感染的快速筛查和成本有效的检测提供了一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Health
Smart Health Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信