100 years of Thorek method - is this technique of breast reduction still actual?

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Anna Kasielska-Trojan, Tomasz Zieliński, Bogusław Antoszewski, Marta Fijałkowska
{"title":"100 years of Thorek method - is this technique of breast reduction still actual?","authors":"Anna Kasielska-Trojan,&nbsp;Tomasz Zieliński,&nbsp;Bogusław Antoszewski,&nbsp;Marta Fijałkowska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1922, Max Thorek described the method of breast reduction with the transfer of the nipple-areola complex as free grafts. Initially, this method met with quite a lot of criticism. Therefore, the search for solutions guaranteeing better aesthetic results of breast reduction have been evolved.The aim of the study is to present our own experiences related to the Thorek method of breast reduction in patients with gigantomastia and to consider whether this technique is still relevant in the 21st century.The study included women operated on for large breasts at the Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic between 2012-2021. In the analysis 95 women aged 17 to 76 were involved.In the analyzed group of 95 women, 14 patients underwent breast reduction with transfer of the nipple-areola complex as a free graft (modified Thorek&apos;s method). In the remaining 81 cases, breast reduction was performed with the transfer of the nipple areola complex on the pedicle (upper-medial - 78, lower - 1, upper-lower - McKissock&apos;s method - 2).The usage of Thorek&apos;s method is still actual in a selected group of women. This technique seems to be the only safe one in patients with gigantomastia, with a high risk of nipple-areola complex necrosis related to the distance of nipple transfer, as well as after the end of the reproductive period. Its main disadvantages (tendency to breasts being too wide and flat, unpredictable nipple projection and nipple pigmentation) can be minimized by modification of the Thorek method or minimally invasive follow-up techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1922, Max Thorek described the method of breast reduction with the transfer of the nipple-areola complex as free grafts. Initially, this method met with quite a lot of criticism. Therefore, the search for solutions guaranteeing better aesthetic results of breast reduction have been evolved.The aim of the study is to present our own experiences related to the Thorek method of breast reduction in patients with gigantomastia and to consider whether this technique is still relevant in the 21st century.The study included women operated on for large breasts at the Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic between 2012-2021. In the analysis 95 women aged 17 to 76 were involved.In the analyzed group of 95 women, 14 patients underwent breast reduction with transfer of the nipple-areola complex as a free graft (modified Thorek's method). In the remaining 81 cases, breast reduction was performed with the transfer of the nipple areola complex on the pedicle (upper-medial - 78, lower - 1, upper-lower - McKissock's method - 2).The usage of Thorek's method is still actual in a selected group of women. This technique seems to be the only safe one in patients with gigantomastia, with a high risk of nipple-areola complex necrosis related to the distance of nipple transfer, as well as after the end of the reproductive period. Its main disadvantages (tendency to breasts being too wide and flat, unpredictable nipple projection and nipple pigmentation) can be minimized by modification of the Thorek method or minimally invasive follow-up techniques.

100年的索雷克方法——这种缩胸术还在使用吗?
1922年,马克斯·索雷克(Max Thorek)描述了将乳头-乳晕复合体作为自由移植物进行乳房缩小的方法。最初,这种方法遇到了相当多的批评。因此,寻找解决方案,保证更好的审美效果的乳房缩小已经发展。本研究的目的是介绍我们自己在巨乳症患者的Thorek缩乳方法方面的经验,并考虑该技术在21世纪是否仍然适用。该研究包括2012年至2021年间在整形、重建和美容外科诊所接受过隆胸手术的女性。在分析中,95名年龄在17岁至76岁之间的女性参与了研究。在95名女性的分析组中,14名患者接受了乳房缩小术,并将乳头乳晕复合体作为游离移植物进行转移(改进的Thorek's方法)。在剩下的81例中,乳房缩小是通过在蒂上转移乳头乳晕复体来完成的(上-内侧- 78,下- 1,上-下- mckissock方法- 2)。Thorek's方法在选定的女性群体中仍然实际使用。这种技术似乎是唯一安全的一种对于巨大乳房的患者,乳头乳晕复合体坏死的高风险与乳头移植的距离有关,以及在生殖期结束后。它的主要缺点(乳房太宽太平的倾向,不可预测的乳头突出和乳头色素沉着)可以通过修改Thorek方法或微创随访技术最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信