Analysis of the prescription of benzodiazepines by family physicians in a sample in Rio de Janeiro

Marina Valle, Rafaela Zorzanelli
{"title":"Analysis of the prescription of benzodiazepines by family physicians in a sample in Rio de Janeiro","authors":"Marina Valle, Rafaela Zorzanelli","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v34i159.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative study researched the determinants influencing family physician’s decision on benzodiazepine prescription in a primary care setting, in the city of Rio de Janeiro. An analysis was sought to be elaborated, on how the prescription is negotiated between physician and user. Twelve general practitioners settled in primary care were recruited, gave acceptance signing free and informed consent form, responding to a semi-structured questionnaire that was recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis, from August to December 2017. The questionnaire addressed physicians' perception of complaints in benzodiazepines users, and alternatives offered instead of medicines. Anxiety and insomnia were cited as the most frequent reasons for use. There was also mention of nonspecific somatic complaints, chronic pain, arterial hypertension, and dependence. Most physicians proposed the therapeutic alliance as a mechanism for offering alternatives to reduce the chronic use of benzodiazepines, despite this intervention achieving a low success rate. Longitudinal care was evidenced as a guiding principle. The analysis of the meanings attributed to BZD, as unveiled\nin this work, promotes a discussion about the place of medication in culture and its consequences in the approach to psychological and mental suffering.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"34 159, ene.-mar.","pages":"18-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v34i159.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study researched the determinants influencing family physician’s decision on benzodiazepine prescription in a primary care setting, in the city of Rio de Janeiro. An analysis was sought to be elaborated, on how the prescription is negotiated between physician and user. Twelve general practitioners settled in primary care were recruited, gave acceptance signing free and informed consent form, responding to a semi-structured questionnaire that was recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis, from August to December 2017. The questionnaire addressed physicians' perception of complaints in benzodiazepines users, and alternatives offered instead of medicines. Anxiety and insomnia were cited as the most frequent reasons for use. There was also mention of nonspecific somatic complaints, chronic pain, arterial hypertension, and dependence. Most physicians proposed the therapeutic alliance as a mechanism for offering alternatives to reduce the chronic use of benzodiazepines, despite this intervention achieving a low success rate. Longitudinal care was evidenced as a guiding principle. The analysis of the meanings attributed to BZD, as unveiled in this work, promotes a discussion about the place of medication in culture and its consequences in the approach to psychological and mental suffering.

里约热内卢家庭医生苯二氮卓处方抽样分析
这项定性研究调查了里约热内卢市初级保健机构中影响家庭医生开具苯二氮卓处方的决定因素。研究试图分析医生和使用者之间是如何协商处方的。2017年8月至12月,研究人员招募了12名从事初级保健的全科医生,他们在自由知情同意书上签字同意,并回答了一份半结构式问卷,该问卷被逐字记录和转录以供分析。调查问卷涉及医生对苯二氮卓类药物使用者投诉的看法,以及提供的替代药物。焦虑和失眠被认为是最常见的用药原因。此外,还提到了非特异性躯体不适、慢性疼痛、动脉高血压和依赖性。大多数医生建议将治疗联盟作为提供替代方案的机制,以减少苯二氮卓类药物的长期使用,尽管这种干预措施的成功率很低。纵向护理被证明是一项指导原则。本研究对苯二氮卓类药物的含义进行了分析,从而推动了关于药物在文化中的地位及其对心理和精神痛苦的影响的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信