Amanda J Barabas, Amanda K Darbyshire, Sylvia L Schlegel, Brianna N Gaskill
{"title":"Evaluation of Ambient Sound, Vibration, and Light in Rodent Housing Rooms.","authors":"Amanda J Barabas, Amanda K Darbyshire, Sylvia L Schlegel, Brianna N Gaskill","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excessive sound, vibration, and light are detrimental to rodent welfare, yet these parameters are rarely recorded in vivaria. Whether housing environments exceed the suggested thresholds and which specific factors may alter these parameters is generally unknown. The goal of this study was to determine how environmental factors may alter sound, vibration, and light at the room and cage levels. Measurements were made using an ultrasonic microphone, accelerometer, and light sensor. Measurement sites were 1) in open air at a central location in 64 rooms located in 9 buildings, and 2) inside an empty mouse or rat cage containing chow, water, and bedding and located on an animal transfer station (<i>n</i> = 51) or housing rack (<i>n</i> = 102). Information collected for each transfer station and rack measurement included the year of manufacture, the species on the rack, and the number of cages on the rack. For each location, a baseline measurement was taken with the transfer station turned off, followed by another measurement after the transfer station was turned on. In general, many factors influenced ambient sound, vibration, and light, indicating that values are not uniform across rodent rooms in the same institution or across cages in a single room. Sound peaks capable of startling rodents were measured in association with hallway ultrasonic motion sensors and during cage change. Vibration and light intensity were generally low when cages were located on the rack. In contrast, active transfer stations had more vibration and light intensity, reaching levels that were potentially stressful for rodents. These data reflect the ambient sound, vibration, and light that rodents experience during normal facility operations. These patterns may extend to other locations, but given the variability in all parameters, the data highlight the need for institutions to conduct their own monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732772/pdf/jaalas2022000660.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Excessive sound, vibration, and light are detrimental to rodent welfare, yet these parameters are rarely recorded in vivaria. Whether housing environments exceed the suggested thresholds and which specific factors may alter these parameters is generally unknown. The goal of this study was to determine how environmental factors may alter sound, vibration, and light at the room and cage levels. Measurements were made using an ultrasonic microphone, accelerometer, and light sensor. Measurement sites were 1) in open air at a central location in 64 rooms located in 9 buildings, and 2) inside an empty mouse or rat cage containing chow, water, and bedding and located on an animal transfer station (n = 51) or housing rack (n = 102). Information collected for each transfer station and rack measurement included the year of manufacture, the species on the rack, and the number of cages on the rack. For each location, a baseline measurement was taken with the transfer station turned off, followed by another measurement after the transfer station was turned on. In general, many factors influenced ambient sound, vibration, and light, indicating that values are not uniform across rodent rooms in the same institution or across cages in a single room. Sound peaks capable of startling rodents were measured in association with hallway ultrasonic motion sensors and during cage change. Vibration and light intensity were generally low when cages were located on the rack. In contrast, active transfer stations had more vibration and light intensity, reaching levels that were potentially stressful for rodents. These data reflect the ambient sound, vibration, and light that rodents experience during normal facility operations. These patterns may extend to other locations, but given the variability in all parameters, the data highlight the need for institutions to conduct their own monitoring.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news.
All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.