Australian physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing distress: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2204962
Ryan L McGrath, Sarah Verdon, Tracey Parnell, Rodney Pope
{"title":"Australian physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing distress: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Ryan L McGrath, Sarah Verdon, Tracey Parnell, Rodney Pope","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2204962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research suggests physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing psychological distress is common; however, there is significant variation in the frequency of such contact.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to 1) investigate Australian physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing various forms of psychological distress; 2) identify potential factors that predict perceived frequency of contact; and 3) explore physiotherapists' beliefs regarding their role and self-reported capability to identify and assess psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey of 340 Australian physiotherapists was conducted, and the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physiotherapists' perceived frequencies of contact with psychologically distressed and severely distressed clients expressed as proportions of all clients seen each week were 36.1% and 15.6%, respectively. Factors related to the clinical setting were stronger predictors of the perceived frequency of contact (Cohen's f<sup>2</sup> = 0.16) than factors related to the physiotherapists themselves (Cohen's f<sup>2</sup> = 0.03). Despite believing that identifying psychological distress was within their scope of practice, the physiotherapists in the study felt that assessing and managing this distress fell outside or on the boundary of their scope of practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Australian physiotherapists frequently encounter clients they perceive to be experiencing psychological distress. Future research into physiotherapists' capability to assess and respond to client psychological distress, using non-self-reported measures, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2204962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing psychological distress is common; however, there is significant variation in the frequency of such contact.

Objective: The study aimed to 1) investigate Australian physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing various forms of psychological distress; 2) identify potential factors that predict perceived frequency of contact; and 3) explore physiotherapists' beliefs regarding their role and self-reported capability to identify and assess psychological distress.

Methods: A nationwide online survey of 340 Australian physiotherapists was conducted, and the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and regression analysis.

Results: Physiotherapists' perceived frequencies of contact with psychologically distressed and severely distressed clients expressed as proportions of all clients seen each week were 36.1% and 15.6%, respectively. Factors related to the clinical setting were stronger predictors of the perceived frequency of contact (Cohen's f2 = 0.16) than factors related to the physiotherapists themselves (Cohen's f2 = 0.03). Despite believing that identifying psychological distress was within their scope of practice, the physiotherapists in the study felt that assessing and managing this distress fell outside or on the boundary of their scope of practice.

Conclusion: Australian physiotherapists frequently encounter clients they perceive to be experiencing psychological distress. Future research into physiotherapists' capability to assess and respond to client psychological distress, using non-self-reported measures, is required.

澳大利亚物理治疗师的感知频率接触客户经历痛苦:横断面调查。
背景:以往的研究表明,物理治疗师与经历心理困扰的客户接触的感知频率是普遍的;然而,这种接触的频率有很大的变化。目的:本研究旨在1)调查澳大利亚物理治疗师与经历各种形式心理困扰的客户接触的感知频率;2)识别预测感知接触频率的潜在因素;3)探讨物理治疗师在识别和评估心理困扰方面的角色和自我报告能力。方法:在全国范围内对340名澳大利亚物理治疗师进行在线调查,采用描述性分析和回归分析方法对数据进行分析。结果:物理治疗师接触心理困扰患者和严重困扰患者的感知频率分别为36.1%和15.6%。与临床环境相关的因素(Cohen’s f2 = 0.16)比与物理治疗师本身相关的因素(Cohen’s f2 = 0.03)更能预测感知接触频率。尽管相信识别心理困扰是在他们的实践范围内,但研究中的物理治疗师认为评估和管理这种困扰超出了他们的实践范围。结论:澳大利亚物理治疗师经常遇到他们认为正在经历心理困扰的客户。未来需要研究物理治疗师评估和应对客户心理困扰的能力,使用非自我报告的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信