Efficacy of two different dosages of prednisone for treatment of subacute thyroiditis: a single-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yiqi Xu, Shu Liu, Xiaofan Zeng, Qian Wu, Yueping Chen, Chunling He, Qing Zhai, Binhua Zhang, Jialin Gao
{"title":"Efficacy of two different dosages of prednisone for treatment of subacute thyroiditis: a single-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Yiqi Xu,&nbsp;Shu Liu,&nbsp;Xiaofan Zeng,&nbsp;Qian Wu,&nbsp;Yueping Chen,&nbsp;Chunling He,&nbsp;Qing Zhai,&nbsp;Binhua Zhang,&nbsp;Jialin Gao","doi":"10.5603/EP.a2023.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of low-dose (LD) and regular-dose (RD) prednisone (PDN) for the treatment of subacute thyroiditis (SAT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients were randomly allocated using the block randomization method to the 2 groups. The primary outcome was the time required for PDN treatment. Secondary outcomes included percentages of relapse, mean score for the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8© (MMAS-8), time required for symptoms to resolve, cumulative PDN dose (mg), and mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at 2 weeks and at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 77 patients, randomized 74 participants, and 68 completed the study. There was no significant difference in the treatment duration between the LD and RD groups (55.31 ± 14.05 vs. 61.25 ± 19.95 days, p = 0.053). The mean difference in the time required for PDN treatment between the LD and RD groups was -1.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -10.64 to 6.92] days, which was within the non-inferiority margin of 7 days. There was a significant difference in the mean score for MMAS-8 between the LD and RD groups (5.84 ± 0.88 vs. 5.33 ± 1.12, p = 0.031). Also, there was a significant difference in the cumulative PDN dose between the LD and RD groups (504.22 ± 236.86 vs. 1002.28 ± 309.86, p = 0.046). The ESR at 2 weeks was statistically significant compared to baseline values in both groups, with pre-treatment and post-treatment ESRs of 49.91 ± 24.95 and 17.91 ± 12.60/mm/h, (p < 0.0001) in the LD group and 65.08 ± 21.77 and 17.23 ± 13.61/mm/h (p < 0.0001) in the RD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose PDN therapy may be sufficient to achieve complete recovery and better outcomes for SAT. This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (02/10/2021 ChiCTR2100051762).</p>","PeriodicalId":11551,"journal":{"name":"Endokrynologia Polska","volume":"74 2","pages":"168-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endokrynologia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/EP.a2023.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of low-dose (LD) and regular-dose (RD) prednisone (PDN) for the treatment of subacute thyroiditis (SAT).

Material and methods: Patients were randomly allocated using the block randomization method to the 2 groups. The primary outcome was the time required for PDN treatment. Secondary outcomes included percentages of relapse, mean score for the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8© (MMAS-8), time required for symptoms to resolve, cumulative PDN dose (mg), and mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at 2 weeks and at baseline.

Results: The study cohort included 77 patients, randomized 74 participants, and 68 completed the study. There was no significant difference in the treatment duration between the LD and RD groups (55.31 ± 14.05 vs. 61.25 ± 19.95 days, p = 0.053). The mean difference in the time required for PDN treatment between the LD and RD groups was -1.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -10.64 to 6.92] days, which was within the non-inferiority margin of 7 days. There was a significant difference in the mean score for MMAS-8 between the LD and RD groups (5.84 ± 0.88 vs. 5.33 ± 1.12, p = 0.031). Also, there was a significant difference in the cumulative PDN dose between the LD and RD groups (504.22 ± 236.86 vs. 1002.28 ± 309.86, p = 0.046). The ESR at 2 weeks was statistically significant compared to baseline values in both groups, with pre-treatment and post-treatment ESRs of 49.91 ± 24.95 and 17.91 ± 12.60/mm/h, (p < 0.0001) in the LD group and 65.08 ± 21.77 and 17.23 ± 13.61/mm/h (p < 0.0001) in the RD group.

Conclusion: Low-dose PDN therapy may be sufficient to achieve complete recovery and better outcomes for SAT. This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (02/10/2021 ChiCTR2100051762).

两种不同剂量强的松治疗亚急性甲状腺炎的疗效:一项单中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
前言:本研究旨在探讨低剂量(LD)和常规剂量(RD)强的松(PDN)治疗亚急性甲状腺炎(SAT)的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:采用分组随机法将患者随机分为两组。主要结果是PDN治疗所需的时间。次要结局包括复发率、Morisky药物依从性量表-8©(MMAS-8)的平均评分、症状缓解所需时间、累积PDN剂量(mg)和2周和基线时的平均红细胞沉降率(ESR)。结果:研究队列包括77例患者,随机74名参与者,其中68名完成了研究。LD组与RD组治疗时间差异无统计学意义(55.31±14.05∶61.25±19.95,p = 0.053)。LD组和RD组治疗PDN所需时间的平均差异为-1.86[95%可信区间(CI) = -10.64至6.92]天,在7天的非劣效性范围内。LD组与RD组MMAS-8平均评分差异有统计学意义(5.84±0.88比5.33±1.12,p = 0.031)。此外,LD组和RD组的PDN累积剂量也有显著差异(504.22±236.86比1002.28±309.86,p = 0.046)。两组2周ESR与基线值比较均有统计学意义,LD组治疗前和治疗后ESR分别为49.91±24.95和17.91±12.60/mm/h (p < 0.0001), RD组为65.08±21.77和17.23±13.61/mm/h (p < 0.0001)。结论:低剂量PDN治疗可能足以实现SAT的完全恢复和更好的结果。该研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(02/10/2021 ChiCTR2100051762)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endokrynologia Polska
Endokrynologia Polska ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Endokrynologia Polska" publishes papers in English on all aspects of clinical and experimental endocrinology. The following types of papers may be submitted for publication: original articles, reviews, case reports, postgraduate education, letters to the Editor (Readers’ Forum) and announcements of scientific meetings, conferences and congresses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信