Effects of an Integrated Geriatric-Orthopedic Co-management (InGerO) on the Treatment of Older Orthopedic Patients with Native and Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2039-3084
Ulrike De Bueck, Hendrik Kohlhof, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Albert Lukas
{"title":"Effects of an Integrated Geriatric-Orthopedic Co-management (InGerO) on the Treatment of Older Orthopedic Patients with Native and Periprosthetic Joint Infections.","authors":"Ulrike De Bueck, Hendrik Kohlhof, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Albert Lukas","doi":"10.1055/a-2039-3084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In view of our aging society, co-management with a geriatrician is becoming increasingly important. While such collaborations have been working successfully in trauma surgery for years, it is still unclear whether they are also helpful for non-trauma patients in orthopedics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of such a cooperation in orthopedic non-trauma patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections on the basis of five key areas.A retrospective observational study as a before and after comparison was used to compare routine data from patients with and without orthogeriatric co-management after nontraumatic surgery. Eligible patients for the study were 70 years and older, had a diagnosis of hip, knee, or shoulder infection, and had been hospitalized for at least 14 days. Co-management consisted of close follow-up by a geriatrician, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and \"complex early geriatric rehabilitation\". The comparison group received therapy as usual, without a geriatrician and without \"complex early geriatric rehabilitation\". Special attention was paid to delirium, pain, mobility, postoperative complications, and renal function.Analysis was carried out with 59 patients \"with\" and 63 \"without\" geriatric co-management. In the co-management group, delirium was detected significantly more often (p < 0.001), significantly lower pain intensities were measured at the time of discharge (p < 0.001), transfer ability had clearly improved more (p = 0.04), and renal function was more frequently noted (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found with respect to principal diagnoses, surgical procedures performed, complication rates, pressure ulcer and delirium incidence, operative revisions, or length of inpatient stay.Orthogeriatric co-management in orthopedic patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections and nontraumatic surgery appears to have positive impacts on recognition and treatment of delirium, pain management, transfer performance, and attention to renal function. Further studies should follow in order to conclusively assess the value of such co-management in orthopedic nontraumatic surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":"272-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2039-3084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of our aging society, co-management with a geriatrician is becoming increasingly important. While such collaborations have been working successfully in trauma surgery for years, it is still unclear whether they are also helpful for non-trauma patients in orthopedics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of such a cooperation in orthopedic non-trauma patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections on the basis of five key areas.A retrospective observational study as a before and after comparison was used to compare routine data from patients with and without orthogeriatric co-management after nontraumatic surgery. Eligible patients for the study were 70 years and older, had a diagnosis of hip, knee, or shoulder infection, and had been hospitalized for at least 14 days. Co-management consisted of close follow-up by a geriatrician, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and "complex early geriatric rehabilitation". The comparison group received therapy as usual, without a geriatrician and without "complex early geriatric rehabilitation". Special attention was paid to delirium, pain, mobility, postoperative complications, and renal function.Analysis was carried out with 59 patients "with" and 63 "without" geriatric co-management. In the co-management group, delirium was detected significantly more often (p < 0.001), significantly lower pain intensities were measured at the time of discharge (p < 0.001), transfer ability had clearly improved more (p = 0.04), and renal function was more frequently noted (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found with respect to principal diagnoses, surgical procedures performed, complication rates, pressure ulcer and delirium incidence, operative revisions, or length of inpatient stay.Orthogeriatric co-management in orthopedic patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections and nontraumatic surgery appears to have positive impacts on recognition and treatment of delirium, pain management, transfer performance, and attention to renal function. Further studies should follow in order to conclusively assess the value of such co-management in orthopedic nontraumatic surgery patients.

老年医学-矫形外科综合共同管理(InGerO)对治疗患有本地关节感染和假体周围关节感染的老年矫形外科患者的影响。
随着社会老龄化的加剧,与老年病学专家的共同管理变得越来越重要。多年来,这种合作在创伤外科领域取得了成功,但对于骨科非创伤患者是否也有帮助,目前仍不清楚。本研究的目的是根据五个关键领域,调查这种合作对骨科非创伤患者本关节和假体周围关节感染的影响。本研究采用回顾性观察研究的前后对比方法,对非创伤手术后接受和未接受骨科共同管理的患者的常规数据进行比较。符合研究条件的患者年龄在 70 岁及以上,诊断为髋关节、膝关节或肩关节感染,住院至少 14 天。共同管理包括老年病学专家的密切随访、老年病学综合评估以及 "复杂的早期老年病学康复"。对比组接受常规治疗,没有老年病学专家,也没有 "复杂的早期老年康复"。对 59 名 "接受 "和 63 名 "未接受 "老年病共同管理的患者进行了分析。对 59 名 "接受 "和 63 名 "未接受 "老年病科共同管理的患者进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信