Key Stakeholder Perceptions of Standard vs. Total Cost of Ownership: A Procurement Analysis for Orthopaedic-Powered Instruments.

Q3 Medicine

Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.12927/hcq.2023.27050

Aazad Abbas, Olumide Olotu, Sejla Abdic, Albert Yee, Jeremie Larouche, Cari Whyne, Dante Morra, Jay Toor

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares standard procurement methodology (SPM) with total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology for the procurement of orthopaedic-powered instruments. The authors conducted semi-structured standardized interviews with key hospital procurement stakeholders following consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Of the 33 hospital procurement stakeholders interviewed, all (100%) reported that SPM would be easier to use than TCO. However, only six (18%) preferred SPM over TCO. Barriers to the adoption of TCO emerged as a theme. Creating TCO frameworks can help to simplify the process for procurement agents and facilitate its adoption in the healthcare sector.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关键利益相关者对标准与总拥有成本的看法:骨科动力器械的采购分析。

本研究比较了标准采购方法(SPM)与总拥有成本(TCO)的骨科动力器械采购方法。作者按照定性研究报告的统一标准，对主要医院采购利益相关者进行了半结构化的标准化访谈。在接受采访的33个医院采购利益相关者中，所有(100%)都报告说SPM比TCO更容易使用。然而，只有6人(18%)更喜欢SPM而不是TCO。采用TCO的障碍成为一个主题。创建TCO框架有助于简化采购代理的流程，并促进其在医疗保健部门的采用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Governing boards of healthcare organizations in Canada are accountable for the performance of their organization and provide oversight on their decisions. Traditionally, many healthcare boards have focused on finances and community relations and have deferred responsibility for quality of care.