Deviation of Dental Implants Placed by Guided Implant Surgery in Bone Structures with Different Densities.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kadriye Ayça Dere, Sezgi Cinel Sahin, Melih Ozdede
{"title":"Deviation of Dental Implants Placed by Guided Implant Surgery in Bone Structures with Different Densities.","authors":"Kadriye Ayça Dere,&nbsp;Sezgi Cinel Sahin,&nbsp;Melih Ozdede","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the deviations of implants with two different geometries placed with a bone-supported stereolithographic surgical template into the bone of Misch classification densities of D2, D3, and D4. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Eight maxilla and eight mandible models were macrodesigned according to the jaw geometries. Bone densities of these models were created in parallel with the most frequently observed densities in the locations: D3 bone density in the anterior maxilla, D4 bone density in the posterior maxilla, D2 bone density in the anterior mandible, and D3 bone density in the posterior mandible. A bone-supported stereolithographic surgical template was prepared in accordance with the jaw models and planning and used to place 64 NobelParallel Conical Connection RP 4.3 × 13 mm and 64 NobelActive 4.3 × 13 mm implants on the models. Global deviation, lateral deviation, angular deviation, and depth deviation between planned and placed implants were calculated with Hypermesh. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the differences between deviation data of the study groups, and the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used for pairwise comparisons of groups with significant differences. Significance was evaluated as <i>P</i> < .05. <b>Results:</b> The study groups showed statistical differences in terms of global, lateral, and depth deviation (<i>P</i> = .017, <i>P</i> = .044, and <i>P</i> = .012, respectively); no statistical difference was detected in terms of angular deviation (<i>P</i> > .05). When the data of all studies were evaluated, the deviation values for all maxillary and mandibular implants were examined regardless of bone and implant type; no statistical difference was found between the arches in terms of deviation type (<i>P</i> > .05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Regardless of the macrogeometry of the dental implants placed with the guide, no significant difference was observed between the deviation values of the different bone densities they were applied to.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 2","pages":"268-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the deviations of implants with two different geometries placed with a bone-supported stereolithographic surgical template into the bone of Misch classification densities of D2, D3, and D4. Materials and Methods: Eight maxilla and eight mandible models were macrodesigned according to the jaw geometries. Bone densities of these models were created in parallel with the most frequently observed densities in the locations: D3 bone density in the anterior maxilla, D4 bone density in the posterior maxilla, D2 bone density in the anterior mandible, and D3 bone density in the posterior mandible. A bone-supported stereolithographic surgical template was prepared in accordance with the jaw models and planning and used to place 64 NobelParallel Conical Connection RP 4.3 × 13 mm and 64 NobelActive 4.3 × 13 mm implants on the models. Global deviation, lateral deviation, angular deviation, and depth deviation between planned and placed implants were calculated with Hypermesh. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the differences between deviation data of the study groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparisons of groups with significant differences. Significance was evaluated as P < .05. Results: The study groups showed statistical differences in terms of global, lateral, and depth deviation (P = .017, P = .044, and P = .012, respectively); no statistical difference was detected in terms of angular deviation (P > .05). When the data of all studies were evaluated, the deviation values for all maxillary and mandibular implants were examined regardless of bone and implant type; no statistical difference was found between the arches in terms of deviation type (P > .05). Conclusion: Regardless of the macrogeometry of the dental implants placed with the guide, no significant difference was observed between the deviation values of the different bone densities they were applied to.

不同密度骨结构引导种植牙植入偏差的研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估两种不同几何形状的种植体与骨支撑的立体整形手术模板放置在Misch分类密度为D2, D3和D4的骨中的偏差。材料与方法:根据颌骨几何形状设计了8个上颌骨和8个下颌骨模型。这些模型的骨密度与最常观察到的位置的骨密度平行创建:前颌骨D3骨密度,后颌骨D4骨密度,前颌骨D2骨密度,后颌骨D3骨密度。根据颌骨模型和规划制备骨支撑立体光刻手术模板,在模型上放置64枚NobelParallel Conical Connection RP 4.3 × 13 mm和64枚NobelActive 4.3 × 13 mm种植体。利用Hypermesh计算计划种植体和放置种植体之间的整体偏差、侧向偏差、角偏差和深度偏差。各组间偏差数据差异分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,差异显著组间两两比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。差异有显著性,P < 0.05。结果:各研究组在总体、横向和深度偏差方面存在统计学差异(P = 0.017、P = 0.044和P = 0.012);角度偏差差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。当评估所有研究的数据时,检查所有上颌和下颌种植体的偏差值,无论骨和种植体类型如何;不同弓间偏差类型差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:无论引导体放置的种植体的宏观几何形状如何,不同骨密度的偏差值均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信