Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira, José da Conceição Carvalho Júnior, Ricardo Beckhauser Kuhnen, Ana Laura Batista Coelho, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Di Monte, Lydia Masako Ferreira, Daniela Francescato Veiga
{"title":"Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients.","authors":"Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira,&nbsp;José da Conceição Carvalho Júnior,&nbsp;Ricardo Beckhauser Kuhnen,&nbsp;Ana Laura Batista Coelho,&nbsp;Isabella Scavariello Zicari Di Monte,&nbsp;Lydia Masako Ferreira,&nbsp;Daniela Francescato Veiga","doi":"10.1590/acb381223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, 'Support,' had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was 'Qualification' (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by 'Result' (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between 'type of oncologic surgery' and 'intentions of loyalty to the service' (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between 'education' and 'quality of the environment' (ρ = -0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient's level of education, the higher the score attributed to 'relationship' (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of 'aesthetics and functionality' (ρ = -0.237; p = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":6992,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"38 ","pages":"e381223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb381223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service.

Results: Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, 'Support,' had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was 'Qualification' (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by 'Result' (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between 'type of oncologic surgery' and 'intentions of loyalty to the service' (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between 'education' and 'quality of the environment' (ρ = -0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient's level of education, the higher the score attributed to 'relationship' (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of 'aesthetics and functionality' (ρ = -0.237; p = 0.024).

Conclusions: The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients.

患者对某大学医院乳房再造服务质量的评价。
目的:评价某大学附属医院乳房再造术的质量。方法:这项横断面研究纳入了在评估前1至24个月在大学医院接受任何技术的立即或延迟乳房重建的成年妇女。巴西版的卫生服务质量量表(HSQS)自行应用于参与者。HSQS产生百分制分数,百分制分数以0到10的数值表示,并形成总体百分制质量分数。管理团队被要求为乳房重建服务建立一个最低满意分数。结果:纳入90例患者。管理团队认为8分是这项服务的最低满意分数。总百分率为93.3%。只有一个领域“支持”的平均得分低于“满意”(7.22±3.0);而其他人得分更高。得分最高的领域是“资格”(9.94±0.3),其次是“结果”(9.86±0.4)。“肿瘤手术类型”与“服务忠诚意向”之间存在正相关(ρ = 0.272;P = 0.009),“教育”与“环境质量”之间呈负相关(ρ = -0.218;P = 0.039)。患者受教育程度越高,“关系”得分越高(ρ = 0.261;P = 0.013),“美学和功能”得分越低(ρ = -0.237;P = 0.024)。结论:乳房再造的服务质量令人满意,但仍需改进结构,改善人际关系,并为患者提供更强大的支持网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信