Learning in Tension: A Case Study Examining What Internal Medicine Residents Learn in the Ambulatory Care Setting.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
David C Thomas, Janneke M Frambach, Pim W Teunissen, Tamara Goldberg, Frank W J M Smeenk
{"title":"Learning in Tension: A Case Study Examining What Internal Medicine Residents Learn in the Ambulatory Care Setting.","authors":"David C Thomas,&nbsp;Janneke M Frambach,&nbsp;Pim W Teunissen,&nbsp;Tamara Goldberg,&nbsp;Frank W J M Smeenk","doi":"10.5334/pme.443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical care of patients with complex conditions has shifted to the ambulatory setting, whereas current knowledge of resident learning is primarily based on studies from inpatient settings. Preparing trainees to adapt to this shift necessitates an understanding of what internal medicine (IM) residents currently learn during ambulatory rotations. The aim of this study is to identify what residents learn during their ambulatory care experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative instrumental case study design, the authors conducted separate focus groups with IM trainees (n = 15), supervisors (n = 16), and program directors (n = 5) from two IM programs in New York City, USA in 2019. Participants were invited via email, and focus group sessions were complemented by document analysis of ambulatory syllabi.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on focus group commentary and document analysis, content learned in the ambulatory setting encompassed three domains; 1) patient needs, 2) the resident's role within a healthcare team, and 3) health system opportunities and limitations. Residents also learned about tensions within and between these domains including the skills needed to care for patients versus the skills acquired, a desire for ownership of patient care versus fragmented care, and time allotted versus time required.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study revealed two outcomes about what residents learn during their ambulatory care experience. First, learning content largely fell into three domains. Second, residents learned about the tensions between ideal care delivery and the realities of practice. These results highlight the imperative to better align curricula with clinical environments to meet the learning needs of residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical care of patients with complex conditions has shifted to the ambulatory setting, whereas current knowledge of resident learning is primarily based on studies from inpatient settings. Preparing trainees to adapt to this shift necessitates an understanding of what internal medicine (IM) residents currently learn during ambulatory rotations. The aim of this study is to identify what residents learn during their ambulatory care experience.

Methods: Using a qualitative instrumental case study design, the authors conducted separate focus groups with IM trainees (n = 15), supervisors (n = 16), and program directors (n = 5) from two IM programs in New York City, USA in 2019. Participants were invited via email, and focus group sessions were complemented by document analysis of ambulatory syllabi.

Results: Based on focus group commentary and document analysis, content learned in the ambulatory setting encompassed three domains; 1) patient needs, 2) the resident's role within a healthcare team, and 3) health system opportunities and limitations. Residents also learned about tensions within and between these domains including the skills needed to care for patients versus the skills acquired, a desire for ownership of patient care versus fragmented care, and time allotted versus time required.

Discussion: This study revealed two outcomes about what residents learn during their ambulatory care experience. First, learning content largely fell into three domains. Second, residents learned about the tensions between ideal care delivery and the realities of practice. These results highlight the imperative to better align curricula with clinical environments to meet the learning needs of residents.

Abstract Image

紧张中的学习:内科住院医师在门诊护理环境中学习的个案研究。
简介:复杂病情患者的医疗护理已经转移到门诊设置,而目前的住院医师学习的知识主要是基于从住院设置的研究。准备培训生适应这一转变需要了解内科(IM)居民目前在门诊轮转期间学习的内容。本研究的目的是确定住院医师在他们的门诊护理经验中学到什么。方法:采用定性工具案例研究设计,作者对2019年美国纽约市两个IM项目的IM学员(n = 15)、主管(n = 16)和项目主任(n = 5)进行了单独的焦点小组讨论。通过电子邮件邀请参与者,并通过动态教学大纲的文件分析来补充焦点小组会议。结果:基于焦点小组评论和文献分析,门诊学习内容包括三个领域;1)病人的需要,2)住院医生在医疗团队中的角色,以及3)医疗系统的机会和限制。住院医师还了解了这些领域内部和领域之间的紧张关系,包括护理患者所需的技能与获得的技能,对患者护理所有权的渴望与分散的护理,分配的时间与所需的时间。讨论:本研究揭示了住院医师在门诊护理经验中学到的两个结果。首先,学习内容主要分为三个领域。其次,住院医生了解到理想的护理服务与实践现实之间的紧张关系。这些结果强调了必须更好地将课程与临床环境结合起来,以满足住院医生的学习需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信