Actual status and future directions of cardiac telerehabilitation.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Krzysztof Milewski, Pawel Balsam, Mateusz Kachel, Bronislaw Sitek, Aleksandra Kolarczyk-Haczyk, Szymon Skoczyński, Piotr Hirnle, Monika Gawałko, Łukasz Kołtowski, Renata Główczynska, Tomasz Zając, Andrzej Małecki, Agata Nowak, Paweł Kaźmierczak, Ewa Piotrowicz, Ryszard Piotrowicz, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Grzegorz Opolski, Marcin Grabowski
{"title":"Actual status and future directions of cardiac telerehabilitation.","authors":"Krzysztof Milewski, Pawel Balsam, Mateusz Kachel, Bronislaw Sitek, Aleksandra Kolarczyk-Haczyk, Szymon Skoczyński, Piotr Hirnle, Monika Gawałko, Łukasz Kołtowski, Renata Główczynska, Tomasz Zając, Andrzej Małecki, Agata Nowak, Paweł Kaźmierczak, Ewa Piotrowicz, Ryszard Piotrowicz, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Grzegorz Opolski, Marcin Grabowski","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2022.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telerehabilitation (TR) was developed to achieve the same results as would be achieved by the standard rehabilitation process and to overcome potential geographical barriers and staff deficiencies. This is especially relevant in periodic crisis situations, including the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Proper execution of TR strategy requires both well-educated staff and dedicated equipment. Various studies have shown that TR may have similar effects to traditional rehabilitation in terms of clinical outcomes and may also reduce total healthcare costs per participant, including rehospitalization costs. However, as with any method, TR has its advantages and disadvantages, including a lack of direct contact or prerequisite, rudimentary ability of the patients to handle mobile devices, among other competencies. Herein, is a discussion of the current status of TR, focusing primarily on cardiac TR, describing some technical/organizational and legal aspects, highlighting the indications, examining cost-effectiveness, as well as outlining possible future directions.","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/fd/cardj-30-1-12.PMC9987557.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2022.0104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Telerehabilitation (TR) was developed to achieve the same results as would be achieved by the standard rehabilitation process and to overcome potential geographical barriers and staff deficiencies. This is especially relevant in periodic crisis situations, including the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Proper execution of TR strategy requires both well-educated staff and dedicated equipment. Various studies have shown that TR may have similar effects to traditional rehabilitation in terms of clinical outcomes and may also reduce total healthcare costs per participant, including rehospitalization costs. However, as with any method, TR has its advantages and disadvantages, including a lack of direct contact or prerequisite, rudimentary ability of the patients to handle mobile devices, among other competencies. Herein, is a discussion of the current status of TR, focusing primarily on cardiac TR, describing some technical/organizational and legal aspects, highlighting the indications, examining cost-effectiveness, as well as outlining possible future directions.
心脏远程康复的现状及未来发展方向。
发展远程康复是为了取得与标准康复过程相同的结果,并克服可能的地理障碍和工作人员不足。这在周期性危机局势中尤其重要,包括最近的COVID-19大流行。TR策略的正确执行需要受过良好教育的员工和专用设备。各种研究表明,就临床结果而言,TR可能具有与传统康复相似的效果,也可能降低每位参与者的医疗保健总费用,包括再住院费用。然而,与任何方法一样,TR有其优点和缺点,包括缺乏直接接触或先决条件,患者处理移动设备的基本能力,以及其他能力。本文讨论了TR的现状,主要关注心脏TR,描述了一些技术/组织和法律方面的问题,强调了适应症,检查了成本效益,并概述了可能的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology journal
Cardiology journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community. Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信