The RESearch PARamedic Experience (RESPARE) study: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of research paramedics working in the United Kingdom.

Graham McClelland, Matt Limmer, Karl Charlton
{"title":"The RESearch PARamedic Experience (RESPARE) study: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of research paramedics working in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Graham McClelland, Matt Limmer, Karl Charlton","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The research paramedic position is a relatively niche role undertaken by a small number of paramedics who support, deliver and promote research. Research paramedic roles provide opportunities to develop talented researchers who are recognised as vital elements of developing a research culture within ambulance services. The benefits of research-active clinicians have been recognised at a national level. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of people who work, or have worked, as research paramedics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A generic qualitative approach underpinned by phenomenological concepts was used. Volunteers were recruited via ambulance research leads and social media. Online focus groups allowed participants to discuss their roles with peers who may be geographically distant. Semi-structured interviews expanded on the focus group findings. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen paramedics (66% female, median involvement in research six (interquartile range 2-7) years) representing eight English NHS ambulance trusts participated in three focus groups and five interviews lasting around one hour, in November and December 2021.Six key themes were identified: starting as a research paramedic; barriers and facilitators to working as a research paramedic; research careers; opportunities; the community (support and networking); and the value of a clinical identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many research paramedics had similar experiences in terms of starting their career by delivering research for large studies, then building on this experience and the networks they create to develop their own research. There are common organisational and financial barriers to working as a research paramedic. Career progression in research beyond the research paramedic role is not well defined, but often involves building links outside of the ambulance service.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"7 4","pages":"14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The research paramedic position is a relatively niche role undertaken by a small number of paramedics who support, deliver and promote research. Research paramedic roles provide opportunities to develop talented researchers who are recognised as vital elements of developing a research culture within ambulance services. The benefits of research-active clinicians have been recognised at a national level. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of people who work, or have worked, as research paramedics.

Methods: A generic qualitative approach underpinned by phenomenological concepts was used. Volunteers were recruited via ambulance research leads and social media. Online focus groups allowed participants to discuss their roles with peers who may be geographically distant. Semi-structured interviews expanded on the focus group findings. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework analysis.

Results: Eighteen paramedics (66% female, median involvement in research six (interquartile range 2-7) years) representing eight English NHS ambulance trusts participated in three focus groups and five interviews lasting around one hour, in November and December 2021.Six key themes were identified: starting as a research paramedic; barriers and facilitators to working as a research paramedic; research careers; opportunities; the community (support and networking); and the value of a clinical identity.

Conclusions: Many research paramedics had similar experiences in terms of starting their career by delivering research for large studies, then building on this experience and the networks they create to develop their own research. There are common organisational and financial barriers to working as a research paramedic. Career progression in research beyond the research paramedic role is not well defined, but often involves building links outside of the ambulance service.

研究辅助医务人员经验(RESPARE)研究:探索在英国工作的研究辅助医务人员经验的定性研究。
背景:研究辅助医务人员职位是一个相对小众的职位,由少数辅助医务人员担任,他们支持、提供并促进研究工作。研究型辅助医务人员职位为培养有才华的研究人员提供了机会,他们被认为是在救护服务中发展研究文化的重要因素。积极开展研究的临床医生所带来的益处已在全国范围内得到认可。本研究旨在探讨从事或曾经从事研究型辅助医务人员的经验:方法:采用以现象学概念为基础的通用定性方法。通过救护车研究领导和社交媒体招募志愿者。通过在线焦点小组,参与者可以与远在异地的同行讨论他们的角色。半结构式访谈对焦点小组的研究结果进行了扩展。对数据进行记录、逐字转录,并使用框架分析法进行分析:18 名辅助医务人员(66% 为女性,参与研究工作的时间中位数为 6 年(四分位数间距为 2-7 年))代表 8 个英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)救护托管机构,参加了 2021 年 11 月和 12 月举行的 3 次焦点小组讨论和 5 次约 1 小时的访谈:许多研究型辅助医务人员都有类似的经历,他们通过为大型研究提供研究服务开始自己的职业生涯,然后利用这些经验和他们创建的网络发展自己的研究。从事研究型辅助医务人员的工作在组织和财务方面存在共同障碍。研究辅助医务人员角色之外的研究职业发展并没有明确的定义,但通常涉及到在救护服务之外建立联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信