Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in parotid gland lesions.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hippokratia Pub Date : 2022-01-01
J Hajiioannou, E Gkrinia, G A Brotis, A Saratziotis, C Nepka, C Korais, C Skoulakis
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in parotid gland lesions.","authors":"J Hajiioannou,&nbsp;E Gkrinia,&nbsp;G A Brotis,&nbsp;A Saratziotis,&nbsp;C Nepka,&nbsp;C Korais,&nbsp;C Skoulakis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the fine needle aspiration cytology's (FNAC) diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from inflammatory lesions (Q1) and malignant from their benign counterparts (Q2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a retrospective case series covering a single University Hospital and six attending head and neck surgeons over eight years (January 2011 to July 2017). We concentrated on adults with clinically suspected parotid gland lesions. We offered all patients FNAC biopsy preoperatively, and the final diagnosis was established based on the findings of the final histology. The FNAC and histology results were cross-tabulated in a 2 x 2 contingency table, from which we calculated the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 212 consecutive patients reviewed, and after excluding thirteen cases (8 %) of valid but non-diagnostic FNAC, 161 cases (50 females and 111 males) fulfilled set eligibility criteria. The most common diagnosis was Warthin tumors (53 patients, 34 %), followed by pleomorphic adenomas (52 patients, 33.5 %). The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions and in segregating malignant from benign conditions were estimated to be as high as 50 % and 97 %, and 98 % and 93 %, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNAC is moderately effective in differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic disease and highly accurate in selecting malignant lesions from benign ones. Although the lack of FNAC sensitivity can occasionally be problematic, it still comprises a valuable tool in salivary gland surgery. HIPPOKRATIA 2022, 26 (1):25-31.</p>","PeriodicalId":50405,"journal":{"name":"Hippokratia","volume":"26 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132389/pdf/hippokratia-26-25.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hippokratia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to estimate the fine needle aspiration cytology's (FNAC) diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from inflammatory lesions (Q1) and malignant from their benign counterparts (Q2).

Methods: We present a retrospective case series covering a single University Hospital and six attending head and neck surgeons over eight years (January 2011 to July 2017). We concentrated on adults with clinically suspected parotid gland lesions. We offered all patients FNAC biopsy preoperatively, and the final diagnosis was established based on the findings of the final histology. The FNAC and histology results were cross-tabulated in a 2 x 2 contingency table, from which we calculated the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

Results: From 212 consecutive patients reviewed, and after excluding thirteen cases (8 %) of valid but non-diagnostic FNAC, 161 cases (50 females and 111 males) fulfilled set eligibility criteria. The most common diagnosis was Warthin tumors (53 patients, 34 %), followed by pleomorphic adenomas (52 patients, 33.5 %). The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions and in segregating malignant from benign conditions were estimated to be as high as 50 % and 97 %, and 98 % and 93 %, respectively.

Conclusion: FNAC is moderately effective in differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic disease and highly accurate in selecting malignant lesions from benign ones. Although the lack of FNAC sensitivity can occasionally be problematic, it still comprises a valuable tool in salivary gland surgery. HIPPOKRATIA 2022, 26 (1):25-31.

Abstract Image

细针抽吸细胞学对腮腺病变的诊断准确性。
背景:本研究旨在评估细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)在区分肿瘤性病变与炎症性病变(Q1)以及恶性病变与良性病变(Q2)方面的诊断准确性。我们集中研究了临床上疑似腮腺病变的成年人。我们在术前为所有患者提供了FNAC活检,并根据最终组织学结果确定了最终诊断。FNAC和组织学结果在2 x 2列联表中交叉列出,根据该表我们计算了诊断的准确性、敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。结果:在212名连续接受审查的患者中,在排除13例(8%)有效但非诊断性FNAC后,161例(50名女性和111名男性)符合既定的资格标准。最常见的诊断是Warthin肿瘤(53例,34%),其次是多形性腺瘤(52例,33.5%)。FNAC在区分肿瘤性和非肿瘤性病变以及区分恶性和良性疾病方面的敏感性和特异性估计分别高达50%和97%,以及98%和93%。结论:FNAC在鉴别非肿瘤性疾病和肿瘤性疾病方面具有中等疗效,在良恶性病变中具有较高的准确性。尽管缺乏FNAC敏感性偶尔会有问题,但它仍然是唾液腺手术中的一个有价值的工具。海马2022,26(1):25-31。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hippokratia
Hippokratia MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hippokratia journal is a quarterly issued, open access, peer reviewed, general medical journal, published in Thessaloniki, Greece. It is a forum for all medical specialties. The journal is published continuously since 1997, its official language is English and all submitted manuscripts undergo peer review by two independent reviewers, assigned by the Editor (double blinded review process). Hippokratia journal is managed by its Editorial Board and has an International Advisory Committee and over 500 expert Reviewers covering all medical specialties and additionally Technical Reviewers, Statisticians, Image processing Experts and a journal Secretary. The Society “Friends of Hippokratia Journal” has the financial management of both the printed and electronic edition of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信