Clinical Characteristics and Corticosteroid Responses of Acoustic Neuroma Treated as Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Yoshinari Nakamura, Takaomi Kurioka, Hajime Sano, Shogo Furuki, Taku Yamashita
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Corticosteroid Responses of Acoustic Neuroma Treated as Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.","authors":"Yoshinari Nakamura,&nbsp;Takaomi Kurioka,&nbsp;Hajime Sano,&nbsp;Shogo Furuki,&nbsp;Taku Yamashita","doi":"10.5152/iao.2023.22720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few investigations have been conducted on the clinical characteristics of the differential diagnosis of acoustic neuroma with acute sensorineural hearing loss and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of the differential diagnoses between acoustic neuroma and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients with acute sensorineural hearing loss (142 ears), including acoustic neuroma (19 ears) and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (123 ears), who underwent audiometric and hematologic examinations and received systemic corticosteroid treatment, were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hematological examination revealed that the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fibrinogen values were significantly higher in the idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss group compared to the acoustic neuroma group. Although all patients received corticosteroid treatment, hearing thresholds at the initial examination and 3 months after corticosteroid treatment were significantly higher in the idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss group compared to the acoustic neuroma group at all frequencies. However, hearing recovery was worse in the acoustic neuroma group compared to the idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss group. Furthermore, speech discrimination and short increment sensitivity index tests were not significantly different between the acoustic neuroma and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to reveal that speech discrimination and short increment sensitivity index tests are not useful for the differential diagnoses between acoustic neuroma and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fibrinogen, blood biomarkers of inflammation and blood viscosity, would be considered valuable. Furthermore, acoustic neuroma should be considered in cases where acute sensorineural hearing loss did not recover after corticosteroid treatment, although the initial hearing loss was mild.</p>","PeriodicalId":54793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Advanced Otology","volume":"19 1","pages":"5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/f6/jiao-19-1-5.PMC9984980.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Advanced Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.22720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few investigations have been conducted on the clinical characteristics of the differential diagnosis of acoustic neuroma with acute sensorineural hearing loss and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of the differential diagnoses between acoustic neuroma and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Methods: The medical records of patients with acute sensorineural hearing loss (142 ears), including acoustic neuroma (19 ears) and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (123 ears), who underwent audiometric and hematologic examinations and received systemic corticosteroid treatment, were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Hematological examination revealed that the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fibrinogen values were significantly higher in the idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss group compared to the acoustic neuroma group. Although all patients received corticosteroid treatment, hearing thresholds at the initial examination and 3 months after corticosteroid treatment were significantly higher in the idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss group compared to the acoustic neuroma group at all frequencies. However, hearing recovery was worse in the acoustic neuroma group compared to the idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss group. Furthermore, speech discrimination and short increment sensitivity index tests were not significantly different between the acoustic neuroma and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss groups.

Conclusion: This is the first study to reveal that speech discrimination and short increment sensitivity index tests are not useful for the differential diagnoses between acoustic neuroma and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fibrinogen, blood biomarkers of inflammation and blood viscosity, would be considered valuable. Furthermore, acoustic neuroma should be considered in cases where acute sensorineural hearing loss did not recover after corticosteroid treatment, although the initial hearing loss was mild.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

作为特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失治疗的听神经瘤的临床特征和皮质类固醇反应。
背景:听神经瘤合并急性感音神经性听力损失与特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失鉴别诊断的临床特点研究较少。本研究的目的是探讨听神经瘤与特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失鉴别诊断的临床特点。方法:回顾性分析142例急性感音神经性听力损失患者(包括听神经瘤患者19例)和特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失患者(123例)经听力学和血液学检查并接受全身皮质类固醇治疗的病历。结果:血液学检查显示,特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失组红细胞沉降率和纤维蛋白原值明显高于听神经瘤组。虽然所有患者都接受了皮质类固醇治疗,但在初始检查和皮质类固醇治疗后3个月,特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失组的听力阈值在所有频率上都明显高于听神经瘤组。然而,与特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失组相比,听神经瘤组的听力恢复更差。此外,听神经瘤组和特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失组的言语辨别和短增量灵敏度指数测试差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究首次揭示了语音辨别和短增量敏感性指数测试在听神经瘤和特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失的鉴别诊断中没有价值,而红细胞沉降率和纤维蛋白原(炎症和血液粘度的血液生物标志物)可能被认为是有价值的。此外,如果急性感音神经性听力损失在皮质类固醇治疗后没有恢复,尽管最初的听力损失是轻微的,应该考虑听神经瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Advanced Otology (IAO – Citation Abbreviation: J Int Adv Otol) is an open access double-blind peer-reviewed, international publication. The Journal of International Advanced Otology is fully sponsored and owned by the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society. The Journal of International Advanced Otology is published 3 times per year on April, August, December and its publication language is English. The scope of the Journal is limited with otology, neurotology, audiology (excluding linguistics) and skull base medicine. The Journal of International Advanced Otology aims to publish manuscripts at the highest clinical and scientific level. IAO publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research, review articles, short reports and a limited number of case reports. Controversial patient discussions, communications on emerging technology, and historical issues will also be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书