Together in care: Lessons learned at the intersection of integrated care, quality improvement, and implementation practice in opioid treatment programs.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2022-11-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895221135265
Megan A O'Grady, Rina Randrianarivony, Keith Martin, Yaberci Perez-Cubillan, David C Collymore, Dina Shapiro-Luft, Alexa Beacham, Nyasia Heyward, Belinda Greenfield, Charles J Neighbors
{"title":"Together in care: Lessons learned at the intersection of integrated care, quality improvement, and implementation practice in opioid treatment programs.","authors":"Megan A O'Grady, Rina Randrianarivony, Keith Martin, Yaberci Perez-Cubillan, David C Collymore, Dina Shapiro-Luft, Alexa Beacham, Nyasia Heyward, Belinda Greenfield, Charles J Neighbors","doi":"10.1177/26334895221135265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care programs that systematically and comprehensively address both behavioral and physical health may improve patient outcomes. However, there are few examples of such programs in addiction treatment settings. This article is a practical implementation report describing the implementation of an integrated care program into two opioid treatment programs (OTPs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Strategies used to implement integrated care into two OTPs included external facilitation, quality improvement (QI) processes, staff training, and an integrated organizational structure. Service, implementation, and client outcomes were examined using qualitative interviews with program staff (n  =  16), program enrollment data, and client outcome data (n  =  593) on mental health (MH), physical health, and functional indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staff found the program to generally be acceptable and appropriate, but also noted that the new services added to already busy workflows and more staffing were needed to fully reach the program's potential. The program had a high level of penetration (∼60%-70%), enrolling over 1,200 clients. Staff noted difficulties in connecting clients with some services. Client general functioning and MH symptoms improved, and heavy smoking decreased. The organizational structure and QI activities provided a strong foundation for interactive problem-solving and adaptations that were needed during implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article highlights an example of the intersection of QI and implementation practice. Simplified QI processes, consistent post-implementation meetings, and change teams and champions facilitated implementation; however, ongoing training and support, especially related to data are needed. The OTP setting provided a strong foundation to build integrated care, but careful consideration of new workflows and changes in philosophy for staff is necessary.<b>Plain Language Summary:</b> Providing medical and behavioral health treatment services in the same clinic using coordinated treatment teams, also known as integrated care, improves outcomes among those with chronic physical and behavioral health conditions. However, there are few practical examples of implementation of such programs in addiction treatment settings, which are promising, yet underutilized settings for integrated care programs. A multi-sectoral team used quality improvement (QI) and implementation strategies to implement integrated care into two opioid treatment programs (OTPs). The program enrolled over 1,200 clients and client general functioning and mental health (MH) symptoms improved, and heavy smoking decreased. Qualitative interviews provided important information about the barriers, facilitators, and context around implementation of this program. The OTP setting provided a strong foundation to build integrated care, but careful consideration of new workflows and changes in philosophy for staff, as well as ongoing training and supports for staff, are necessary. This project may help to advance the implementation of integrated care in OTPs by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation, lessons learned, as well as providing a practical example of potentially useful QI and implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/84/10.1177_26334895221135265.PMC9924288.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221135265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrated care programs that systematically and comprehensively address both behavioral and physical health may improve patient outcomes. However, there are few examples of such programs in addiction treatment settings. This article is a practical implementation report describing the implementation of an integrated care program into two opioid treatment programs (OTPs).

Method: Strategies used to implement integrated care into two OTPs included external facilitation, quality improvement (QI) processes, staff training, and an integrated organizational structure. Service, implementation, and client outcomes were examined using qualitative interviews with program staff (n  =  16), program enrollment data, and client outcome data (n  =  593) on mental health (MH), physical health, and functional indicators.

Results: Staff found the program to generally be acceptable and appropriate, but also noted that the new services added to already busy workflows and more staffing were needed to fully reach the program's potential. The program had a high level of penetration (∼60%-70%), enrolling over 1,200 clients. Staff noted difficulties in connecting clients with some services. Client general functioning and MH symptoms improved, and heavy smoking decreased. The organizational structure and QI activities provided a strong foundation for interactive problem-solving and adaptations that were needed during implementation.

Conclusions: This article highlights an example of the intersection of QI and implementation practice. Simplified QI processes, consistent post-implementation meetings, and change teams and champions facilitated implementation; however, ongoing training and support, especially related to data are needed. The OTP setting provided a strong foundation to build integrated care, but careful consideration of new workflows and changes in philosophy for staff is necessary.Plain Language Summary: Providing medical and behavioral health treatment services in the same clinic using coordinated treatment teams, also known as integrated care, improves outcomes among those with chronic physical and behavioral health conditions. However, there are few practical examples of implementation of such programs in addiction treatment settings, which are promising, yet underutilized settings for integrated care programs. A multi-sectoral team used quality improvement (QI) and implementation strategies to implement integrated care into two opioid treatment programs (OTPs). The program enrolled over 1,200 clients and client general functioning and mental health (MH) symptoms improved, and heavy smoking decreased. Qualitative interviews provided important information about the barriers, facilitators, and context around implementation of this program. The OTP setting provided a strong foundation to build integrated care, but careful consideration of new workflows and changes in philosophy for staff, as well as ongoing training and supports for staff, are necessary. This project may help to advance the implementation of integrated care in OTPs by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation, lessons learned, as well as providing a practical example of potentially useful QI and implementation strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

共同护理:在阿片类药物治疗计划的综合护理、质量改进和实施实践的交叉点上汲取的经验教训。
背景:系统、全面地解决行为和身体健康问题的综合护理计划可以改善患者的治疗效果。然而,在戒毒治疗机构中很少有此类项目的实例。本文是一份实用的实施报告,介绍了在两个阿片类药物治疗项目(OTPs)中实施综合护理计划的情况:方法:在两个阿片类药物治疗项目中实施综合护理的策略包括外部促进、质量改进(QI)流程、员工培训和综合组织结构。通过对项目工作人员(n = 16)的定性访谈、项目注册数据以及客户在心理健康(MH)、身体健康和功能指标方面的结果数据(n = 593),对服务、实施和客户结果进行了研究:结果:工作人员认为该项目总体上是可以接受的,也是合适的,但同时也指出,新服务增加了本已繁忙的工作流程,需要更多的人手才能充分发挥项目的潜力。该计划的渗透率很高(60%-70%),有 1 200 多名客户参加。工作人员注意到在将客户与某些服务联系起来方面存在困难。服务对象的一般功能和心理健康症状有所改善,大量吸烟的情况也有所减少。组织结构和 QI 活动为互动式问题解决和实施过程中所需的调整奠定了坚实的基础:本文重点介绍了质量改进与实施实践交叉的一个实例。简化的质量改进流程、一致的实施后会议、变革团队和倡导者促进了实施工作;然而,还需要持续的培训和支持,特别是与数据有关的培训和支持。OTP 环境为建立综合护理提供了坚实的基础,但有必要仔细考虑新的工作流程和员工理念的改变。通俗易懂的语言摘要:利用协调治疗团队(也称为综合护理)在同一诊所提供医疗和行为健康治疗服务,可改善慢性身体和行为健康状况患者的治疗效果。然而,在戒毒治疗机构中实施此类计划的实际案例却很少,而戒毒治疗机构是综合护理计划的大有可为之处,但却未得到充分利用。一个多部门团队采用质量改进(QI)和实施策略,在两个阿片类药物治疗项目(OTPs)中实施了综合护理。该项目招收了 1200 多名患者,患者的一般功能和心理健康(MH)症状得到改善,重度吸烟现象也有所减少。定性访谈提供了有关实施该计划的障碍、促进因素和背景的重要信息。OTP 环境为建立综合护理提供了坚实的基础,但有必要仔细考虑新的工作流程和员工理念的转变,以及对员工的持续培训和支持。本项目通过确定实施过程中的障碍和促进因素、吸取的经验教训,以及提供潜在有用的质量改进和实施策略的实际范例,有助于推动综合护理在开放式门诊中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信