Concordance of multiple informant assessment of school-based social skills intervention and association with child outcomes: Results from a randomized trial.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2023-02-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895231154289
Daina M Tagavi, Kaitlyn Ahlers, Alice Bravo, Alana J McVey, Jill Locke
{"title":"Concordance of multiple informant assessment of school-based social skills intervention and association with child outcomes: Results from a randomized trial.","authors":"Daina M Tagavi, Kaitlyn Ahlers, Alice Bravo, Alana J McVey, Jill Locke","doi":"10.1177/26334895231154289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fidelity, or the degree to which an intervention is implemented as designed, is essential for effective implementation. There has been a growing emphasis on assessing fidelity of evidence-based practices for autistic children in schools. Fidelity measurement should be multidimensional and focus on core intervention components and assess their link with program outcomes. This study evaluated the relation between intervention fidelity ratings from multiple sources, tested the relation between fidelity ratings and child outcomes, and determined the relations between core intervention components and child outcomes in a study of an evidence-based psychosocial intervention designed to promote inclusion of autistic children at school, Remaking Recess.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study extends from a larger randomized controlled trial examining the effect of implementation support on Remaking Recess fidelity and child outcomes. Schools were randomized to receive the intervention or the intervention plus implementation support. Observers, intervention coaches, and school personnel completed fidelity measures to rate completion and quality of intervention delivery. A measure of peer engagement served as the child outcome. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine concordance between raters. Two sets of hierarchical linear models were conducted using fidelity indices as predictors of peer engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coach- and self-rated completion and quality scores, observer- and self-rated quality scores, and observer- and coach-rated quality fidelity scores were significantly correlated. Higher observer-rated completion and quality fidelity scores were predictors of higher peer engagement scores. No single intervention component emerged as a significant predictor of peer engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the importance of using a multidimensional approach for measuring fidelity, testing the link between fidelity and child outcomes, and examining how core intervention components may be associated with child outcomes. Future research should clarify how to improve multi-informant reports to provide \"good enough\" ratings of fidelity that provide meaningful information about outcomes in community settings.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Fidelity is defined as how closely an intervention is administered in the way the creators intended. Fidelity is important because it allows researchers to determine what exactly is leading to changes. In recent years, there has been an interest in examining fidelity of interventions for autistic children who receive services in school. This study looked at the relationship between fidelity ratings from multiple individuals, the relationship between fidelity and child outcomes, and the relationship between individual intervention component and child changes in a study of Remaking Recess, an intervention for autistic children at school. Schools were randomly selected to receive the intervention only or the intervention plus implementation support from the research team. Observers, intervention coaches, and individuals delivering the intervention themselves completed fidelity measures. Child engagement with peers was measured before and after the intervention. Several measures of self-, coach-, and observer-report fidelity were associated with each other. Higher observer-reported fidelity was associated with higher child peer engagement scores. No single intervention step was linked to child peer engagement and both treatment groups had similar outcomes in terms of fidelity. This study shows the importance of having multiple raters assess different parts of intervention fidelity, looking at the link between fidelity and child outcomes, and seeing how individual intervention steps may be related to outcomes. Future research should aim to find out which types of fidelity ratings are \"good enough\" to lead to positive changes following treatment so that those aspects can be used and targeted in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/50/10.1177_26334895231154289.PMC9978620.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231154289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fidelity, or the degree to which an intervention is implemented as designed, is essential for effective implementation. There has been a growing emphasis on assessing fidelity of evidence-based practices for autistic children in schools. Fidelity measurement should be multidimensional and focus on core intervention components and assess their link with program outcomes. This study evaluated the relation between intervention fidelity ratings from multiple sources, tested the relation between fidelity ratings and child outcomes, and determined the relations between core intervention components and child outcomes in a study of an evidence-based psychosocial intervention designed to promote inclusion of autistic children at school, Remaking Recess.

Method: This study extends from a larger randomized controlled trial examining the effect of implementation support on Remaking Recess fidelity and child outcomes. Schools were randomized to receive the intervention or the intervention plus implementation support. Observers, intervention coaches, and school personnel completed fidelity measures to rate completion and quality of intervention delivery. A measure of peer engagement served as the child outcome. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine concordance between raters. Two sets of hierarchical linear models were conducted using fidelity indices as predictors of peer engagement.

Results: Coach- and self-rated completion and quality scores, observer- and self-rated quality scores, and observer- and coach-rated quality fidelity scores were significantly correlated. Higher observer-rated completion and quality fidelity scores were predictors of higher peer engagement scores. No single intervention component emerged as a significant predictor of peer engagement.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of using a multidimensional approach for measuring fidelity, testing the link between fidelity and child outcomes, and examining how core intervention components may be associated with child outcomes. Future research should clarify how to improve multi-informant reports to provide "good enough" ratings of fidelity that provide meaningful information about outcomes in community settings.

Plain language summary: Fidelity is defined as how closely an intervention is administered in the way the creators intended. Fidelity is important because it allows researchers to determine what exactly is leading to changes. In recent years, there has been an interest in examining fidelity of interventions for autistic children who receive services in school. This study looked at the relationship between fidelity ratings from multiple individuals, the relationship between fidelity and child outcomes, and the relationship between individual intervention component and child changes in a study of Remaking Recess, an intervention for autistic children at school. Schools were randomly selected to receive the intervention only or the intervention plus implementation support from the research team. Observers, intervention coaches, and individuals delivering the intervention themselves completed fidelity measures. Child engagement with peers was measured before and after the intervention. Several measures of self-, coach-, and observer-report fidelity were associated with each other. Higher observer-reported fidelity was associated with higher child peer engagement scores. No single intervention step was linked to child peer engagement and both treatment groups had similar outcomes in terms of fidelity. This study shows the importance of having multiple raters assess different parts of intervention fidelity, looking at the link between fidelity and child outcomes, and seeing how individual intervention steps may be related to outcomes. Future research should aim to find out which types of fidelity ratings are "good enough" to lead to positive changes following treatment so that those aspects can be used and targeted in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多方信息提供者对校本社交技能干预评估的一致性以及与儿童结果的关联:随机试验的结果。
背景:忠实度,即干预措施按设计实施的程度,是有效实施的关键。对学校自闭症儿童循证干预措施的忠实度评估越来越受到重视。忠实度的测量应该是多维度的,重点关注干预措施的核心组成部分,并评估其与项目成果之间的联系。本研究评估了多种来源的干预忠实度评级之间的关系,测试了忠实度评级与儿童结果之间的关系,并确定了核心干预内容与儿童结果之间的关系:本研究是从一项更大的随机对照试验中延伸出来的,该试验研究了实施支持对 "重塑课间休息 "的忠诚度和儿童成果的影响。学校被随机分配接受干预或干预加实施支持。观察者、干预辅导员和学校工作人员完成保真度测量,以评价干预的完成情况和质量。衡量同伴参与度的指标作为儿童的结果。通过计算皮尔逊相关系数来确定评分者之间的一致性。使用忠实度指数作为同伴参与度的预测因子,建立了两组分层线性模型:结果:教练和自我评分的完成度和质量得分、观察者和自我评分的质量得分以及观察者和教练评分的质量忠诚度得分均有显著相关性。观察者评分的完成度和质量保真度得分越高,则同伴参与度得分越高。没有任何一项干预内容能够显著预测同伴参与度:这项研究表明,使用多维方法来衡量忠实度、测试忠实度与儿童结果之间的联系以及研究核心干预内容如何与儿童结果相关联,具有重要意义。未来的研究应阐明如何改进多信息者报告,以提供 "足够好 "的忠实度评级,从而为社区环境中的结果提供有意义的信息:忠实度的定义是干预措施在多大程度上按照设计者的意图实施。忠实度之所以重要,是因为它能让研究人员确定究竟是什么导致了变化。近年来,人们开始关注对在学校接受服务的自闭症儿童进行干预的忠实性研究。本研究考察了 "重塑课间休息"(一种针对在校自闭症儿童的干预措施)研究中,来自多方的忠实度评分之间的关系、忠实度与儿童结果之间的关系,以及单个干预部分与儿童变化之间的关系。学校被随机选中,只接受干预措施,或接受干预措施加上研究小组的实施支持。观察者、干预辅导员和亲自实施干预的个人都完成了忠实度测量。对干预前后儿童与同伴的互动情况进行了测量。自我、教练和观察者报告的几项忠实度测量结果相互关联。观察者报告的忠实度越高,儿童的同伴参与得分就越高。没有任何一个干预步骤与儿童同伴参与度相关联,两个治疗组在忠实度方面的结果相似。这项研究表明,让多个评分者对干预忠实度的不同部分进行评估、观察忠实度与儿童结果之间的联系以及了解单个干预步骤与结果之间的关系非常重要。未来的研究应着眼于找出哪些类型的忠实度评级 "足够好",从而导致治疗后的积极变化,以便在未来使用这些方面并有的放矢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信