Teacher attitudes toward evidence-based practices: Exploratory and confirmatory analyses of the school-adapted evidence-based practice attitude scale.

James L Merle, Clayton R Cook, Jill J Locke, Mark G Ehrhart, Eric C Brown, Chayna J Davis, Aaron R Lyon
{"title":"Teacher attitudes toward evidence-based practices: Exploratory and confirmatory analyses of the school-adapted evidence-based practice attitude scale.","authors":"James L Merle, Clayton R Cook, Jill J Locke, Mark G Ehrhart, Eric C Brown, Chayna J Davis, Aaron R Lyon","doi":"10.1177/26334895221151026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) is widely used in implementation research, but it has not been adapted and validated for use among general education teachers, who are most likely to deliver evidence-based prevention programs in schools, the most common setting where youth access social, emotional, and behavioral health services. Method School-based stakeholders and a research team comprised of experts in the implementation of evidence-based practices in schools adapted the EBPAS for teachers (the S-EBPAS). The adapted instrument was administered to a representative sample (n = 441) of general education teachers (grades K—5) to assess the reliability and internal consistency via factor analyses. The S-EBPAS included two forms (i.e., EBP-agnostic and EBP-specific item referents), therefore, a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was also performed to establish measurement invariance between the two forms. Results After adaptation and refinement, a 9-item, 3-factor structure was confirmed, with the final model supporting three first-order factors that load onto a second-order factor capturing attitudes toward adopting evidence-based practices. Multiple-group CFA analyses of measurement invariance indicated there were no significant differences between the two forms. Conclusions Overall, this study provides a brief, flexible instrument capturing attitudes toward adopting EBPs that has high reliability and internal consistency, which support its use among general education teachers in school settings implementing evidence-based practices. Plain Language Summary The Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) is a popular instrument for measuring attitudes toward evidence-based practices (EBPs). This instrument provides valuable information during implementation initiatives, such as whether providers or front-line implementers have favorable attitudes toward a given practice. The EBPAS has been used in many different settings, such as in community-based mental health clinics, medical hospitals, and in child welfare. However, it's use in schools has been limited, and it has not yet been tested with general education teachers, who are key implementers of evidence-based practices in schools. In order to trust that the scores from an instrument are accurate, it needs to be evaluated when scaling it out to new populations and settings. One popular method to determine this is to use factor analysis, which was employed in this study. This study fills the identified gap by assessing the reliability (i.e., accuracy) and internal consistency of the EBPAS among a representative sample of general education teachers. Findings from this study indicate that the school-adapted EBPAS (S-EBPAS) is a brief, nine-item instrument that provides a reliable estimate of teachers’ attitudes toward evidence-based practices. Our results also provide evidence that the S-EBPAS can be used to capture attitudes toward specific EBPs as well as attitudes toward EBP-agnostic. This study provides a flexible instrument that can be used by school-based implementation researchers, practitioners, and intermediaries at multiple phases of implementation projects, such as when exploring a new EBP to adopt.","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/50/10.1177_26334895221151026.PMC9924278.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221151026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) is widely used in implementation research, but it has not been adapted and validated for use among general education teachers, who are most likely to deliver evidence-based prevention programs in schools, the most common setting where youth access social, emotional, and behavioral health services. Method School-based stakeholders and a research team comprised of experts in the implementation of evidence-based practices in schools adapted the EBPAS for teachers (the S-EBPAS). The adapted instrument was administered to a representative sample (n = 441) of general education teachers (grades K—5) to assess the reliability and internal consistency via factor analyses. The S-EBPAS included two forms (i.e., EBP-agnostic and EBP-specific item referents), therefore, a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was also performed to establish measurement invariance between the two forms. Results After adaptation and refinement, a 9-item, 3-factor structure was confirmed, with the final model supporting three first-order factors that load onto a second-order factor capturing attitudes toward adopting evidence-based practices. Multiple-group CFA analyses of measurement invariance indicated there were no significant differences between the two forms. Conclusions Overall, this study provides a brief, flexible instrument capturing attitudes toward adopting EBPs that has high reliability and internal consistency, which support its use among general education teachers in school settings implementing evidence-based practices. Plain Language Summary The Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) is a popular instrument for measuring attitudes toward evidence-based practices (EBPs). This instrument provides valuable information during implementation initiatives, such as whether providers or front-line implementers have favorable attitudes toward a given practice. The EBPAS has been used in many different settings, such as in community-based mental health clinics, medical hospitals, and in child welfare. However, it's use in schools has been limited, and it has not yet been tested with general education teachers, who are key implementers of evidence-based practices in schools. In order to trust that the scores from an instrument are accurate, it needs to be evaluated when scaling it out to new populations and settings. One popular method to determine this is to use factor analysis, which was employed in this study. This study fills the identified gap by assessing the reliability (i.e., accuracy) and internal consistency of the EBPAS among a representative sample of general education teachers. Findings from this study indicate that the school-adapted EBPAS (S-EBPAS) is a brief, nine-item instrument that provides a reliable estimate of teachers’ attitudes toward evidence-based practices. Our results also provide evidence that the S-EBPAS can be used to capture attitudes toward specific EBPs as well as attitudes toward EBP-agnostic. This study provides a flexible instrument that can be used by school-based implementation researchers, practitioners, and intermediaries at multiple phases of implementation projects, such as when exploring a new EBP to adopt.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

教师对循证实践的态度:学校适应循证实践态度量表的探索性和验证性分析。
背景:基于证据的实践态度量表(EBPAS)在实施研究中被广泛使用,但它还没有在普通教育教师中进行调整和验证,而普通教育教师最有可能在学校提供基于证据的预防项目,而学校是青少年获得社会、情感和行为健康服务的最常见的环境。方法:以学校为基础的利益相关者和一个由在学校实施循证实践的专家组成的研究小组为教师改编了EBPAS (S-EBPAS)。对441名通识教育教师(K-5年级)的代表性样本(n = 441)进行了调整后的工具,通过因子分析来评估信度和内部一致性。S-EBPAS包括两种形式(即ebp不可知和ebp特异性项目参考物),因此,还进行了多组验证性因子分析(CFA)以建立两种形式之间的测量不变性。结果:经过调整和细化,确定了一个9项3因素结构,最终模型支持三个一阶因素加载到一个二阶因素上,反映了采取循证实践的态度。测量不变性的多组CFA分析表明,两种形式之间没有显著差异。结论:总体而言,本研究提供了一个简短、灵活的工具,捕捉人们对采用ebp的态度,该工具具有高可靠性和内部一致性,支持在实施循证实践的学校环境中通识教育教师使用ebp。简单的语言总结:循证实践态度量表(EBPAS)是一种流行的测量对循证实践(ebp)态度的工具。该工具在实施计划期间提供有价值的信息,例如提供者或一线实现者是否对给定的实践有有利的态度。EBPAS已在许多不同的环境中使用,例如社区精神卫生诊所、医疗医院和儿童福利机构。然而,它在学校的使用是有限的,而且还没有在普通教育教师中进行测试,而普通教育教师是学校循证实践的主要实施者。为了相信一种工具的分数是准确的,在将其扩展到新的人群和环境时需要对其进行评估。一个流行的方法来确定这是使用因子分析,这是在本研究中采用。本研究在通识教育教师的代表性样本中,通过评估EBPAS的信度(即准确性)和内部一致性来填补这一空白。本研究的结果表明,学校适应EBPAS (S-EBPAS)是一个简短的、包含9个项目的工具,可以可靠地估计教师对循证实践的态度。我们的研究结果也提供了证据,表明s - ebp可以用来捕捉对特定ebp的态度,以及对ebp不可知的态度。本研究提供了一种灵活的工具,可以供校本实施研究人员、实践者和中介机构在实施项目的多个阶段使用,例如在探索要采用的新EBP时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信