Economic costs of implementing evidence-based telemedicine outreach for posttraumatic stress disorder in VA.

Edwin S Wong, Suparna Rajan, Chuan-Fen Liu, Leslie A Morland, Jeffrey M Pyne, Fatma Simsek-Duran, Heather S Reisinger, Jane Moeckli, John C Fortney
{"title":"Economic costs of implementing evidence-based telemedicine outreach for posttraumatic stress disorder in VA.","authors":"Edwin S Wong,&nbsp;Suparna Rajan,&nbsp;Chuan-Fen Liu,&nbsp;Leslie A Morland,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Pyne,&nbsp;Fatma Simsek-Duran,&nbsp;Heather S Reisinger,&nbsp;Jane Moeckli,&nbsp;John C Fortney","doi":"10.1177/26334895221116771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine outreach for posttraumatic stress disorder (TOP) is a virtual evidence-based practice (EBP) involving telephone care management and telepsychology that engages rural patients in trauma-focused psychotherapy. This evaluation examined implementation and intervention costs attributable to deploying TOP from a health system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Costs were ascertained as part of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at five sites within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. All sites initially received a <i>standard implementation</i> strategy, which included internal facilitation, dissemination of an internal facilitators operational guide, funded care manager, care managing training, and technical support. A subset of clinics that failed to meet performance metrics were subsequently randomized to <i>enhanced implementation</i>, which added external facilitation that focused on incorporating TOP clinical processes into existing clinic workflow. We measured site-level implementation activities using project records and structured activity logs tracking personnel-level time devoted to all implementation activities. We monetized time devoted to implementation activities by applying an opportunity cost approach. Intervention costs were measured as accounting-based costs for telepsychiatry/telepsychology and care manager visits, ascertained using VA administrative data. We conducted descriptive analyses of strategy-specific implementation costs across five sites. Descriptive analyses were conducted instead of population-level cost-effectiveness analysis because previous research found enhanced implementation was not more successful than the standard implementation in improving uptake of TOP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 40-month study period, four of five sites received enhanced implementation. Mean site-level implementation cost per month was $919 (SD = $238) during standard implementation and increased to $1,651 (SD = $460) during enhanced implementation. Mean site-level intervention cost per patient-month was $46 (SD = $28) during standard implementation and $31 (SD = $21) during enhanced implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Project findings inform the expected cost of implementing TOP, which represents one factor health systems should consider in the decision to broadly adopt this EBP. <b>Plain Language Summary:</b> <i>What is already known about the topic:</i> Trauma-focused psychotherapy delivered through telemedicine has been demonstrated as an effective approach for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, uptake of this evidence-based approach by integrated health systems such as the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System is low. <i>What does this paper add:</i> This paper presents new findings on the costs of two implementation approaches designed to increase adoption telemedicine outreach for PTSD from a health system perspective. <i>What are the implications for practice, research, and policy:</i> Cost estimates from this paper can be used by health systems to inform the relative value of candidate implementation strategies to increase adoption of evidence-based treatments for PTSD or other mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/84/10.1177_26334895221116771.PMC9924252.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221116771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine outreach for posttraumatic stress disorder (TOP) is a virtual evidence-based practice (EBP) involving telephone care management and telepsychology that engages rural patients in trauma-focused psychotherapy. This evaluation examined implementation and intervention costs attributable to deploying TOP from a health system perspective.

Methods: Costs were ascertained as part of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at five sites within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. All sites initially received a standard implementation strategy, which included internal facilitation, dissemination of an internal facilitators operational guide, funded care manager, care managing training, and technical support. A subset of clinics that failed to meet performance metrics were subsequently randomized to enhanced implementation, which added external facilitation that focused on incorporating TOP clinical processes into existing clinic workflow. We measured site-level implementation activities using project records and structured activity logs tracking personnel-level time devoted to all implementation activities. We monetized time devoted to implementation activities by applying an opportunity cost approach. Intervention costs were measured as accounting-based costs for telepsychiatry/telepsychology and care manager visits, ascertained using VA administrative data. We conducted descriptive analyses of strategy-specific implementation costs across five sites. Descriptive analyses were conducted instead of population-level cost-effectiveness analysis because previous research found enhanced implementation was not more successful than the standard implementation in improving uptake of TOP.

Results: Over the 40-month study period, four of five sites received enhanced implementation. Mean site-level implementation cost per month was $919 (SD = $238) during standard implementation and increased to $1,651 (SD = $460) during enhanced implementation. Mean site-level intervention cost per patient-month was $46 (SD = $28) during standard implementation and $31 (SD = $21) during enhanced implementation.

Conclusions: Project findings inform the expected cost of implementing TOP, which represents one factor health systems should consider in the decision to broadly adopt this EBP. Plain Language Summary: What is already known about the topic: Trauma-focused psychotherapy delivered through telemedicine has been demonstrated as an effective approach for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, uptake of this evidence-based approach by integrated health systems such as the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System is low. What does this paper add: This paper presents new findings on the costs of two implementation approaches designed to increase adoption telemedicine outreach for PTSD from a health system perspective. What are the implications for practice, research, and policy: Cost estimates from this paper can be used by health systems to inform the relative value of candidate implementation strategies to increase adoption of evidence-based treatments for PTSD or other mental health conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

弗吉尼亚州创伤后应激障碍实施循证远程医疗推广的经济成本。
背景:创伤后应激障碍(TOP)的远程医疗外展是一种虚拟循证实践(EBP),涉及电话护理管理和远程心理学,使农村患者参与以创伤为重点的心理治疗。该评价从卫生系统的角度审查了可归因于部署TOP的实施和干预成本。方法:在退伍军人事务(VA)医疗保健系统内的五个地点,作为阶梯楔形集群随机试验的一部分确定成本。所有地点最初都收到了一份标准实施战略,其中包括内部促进、内部促进者操作指南的传播、资助的护理经理、护理管理培训和技术支持。未能达到绩效指标的诊所子集随后被随机分配到加强实施,这增加了外部促进,重点是将TOP临床流程纳入现有的诊所工作流程。我们使用项目记录和结构化的活动日志来测量站点级别的实施活动,跟踪人员级别投入到所有实施活动的时间。我们通过应用机会成本方法将用于实施活动的时间货币化。干预成本被测量为远程精神病学/远程心理和护理经理访问的基于会计的成本,使用VA管理数据确定。我们对五个地点的特定战略实施成本进行了描述性分析。我们进行了描述性分析,而不是人口水平的成本效益分析,因为先前的研究发现,在提高TOP的吸收方面,加强实施并不比标准实施更成功。结果:在40个月的研究期间,5个站点中有4个站点的实施得到了加强。在标准实施期间,每月平均站点级实施成本为919美元(SD = 238美元),在增强实施期间增加到1,651美元(SD = 460美元)。在标准实施期间,每位患者每月的平均现场干预成本为46美元(SD = 28美元),在强化实施期间为31美元(SD = 21美元)。结论:项目结果为实施TOP的预期成本提供了信息,这是卫生系统在决定广泛采用该EBP时应考虑的一个因素。摘要:关于该主题的已知内容:通过远程医疗提供的以创伤为重点的心理治疗已被证明是治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的有效方法。然而,退伍军人事务(VA)卫生保健系统等综合卫生系统对这种循证方法的采用程度很低。本文补充的内容:本文从卫生系统的角度介绍了两种实施方法的成本的新发现,这些方法旨在增加PTSD远程医疗推广的采用。对实践、研究和政策的影响:卫生系统可以使用本文的成本估算来告知候选实施策略的相对价值,以增加对创伤后应激障碍或其他精神健康状况的循证治疗的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信