The effects of leadership for self-worth, inclusion, trust, and psychological safety on medical error reporting.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kim C Brimhall, Chou-Yu Tsai, Rory Eckardt, Shelley Dionne, Biying Yang, Adam Sharp
{"title":"The effects of leadership for self-worth, inclusion, trust, and psychological safety on medical error reporting.","authors":"Kim C Brimhall,&nbsp;Chou-Yu Tsai,&nbsp;Rory Eckardt,&nbsp;Shelley Dionne,&nbsp;Biying Yang,&nbsp;Adam Sharp","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although trust and psychological safety (PS) are critical for improving patient safety and medical error reporting, little is known about how they work together and how health care systems promote PS.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how leadership for self-worth, inclusion, and trust may work together to foster PS and how this influences medical error reporting.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Data were collected in 2019 from 373 employees (24% response rate) in 85 hospital departments (54% response rate) in a nonprofit health care system in the eastern United States. Constructs were operationalized at the department level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negative binomial path model results found several direct effects. Leadership for self-worth was positively associated with inclusion, inclusion was positively associated with trust and PS, trust was positively associated with reported medical errors, and PS was negatively associated with reported medical errors. Indirect effects uncovered leadership for self-worth was positively associated with PS by enhancing inclusion. In addition, leadership for self-worth increased inclusion, which increased trust and ultimately encouraged PS. Leadership for self-worth was associated with fewer reported medical errors through increasing inclusion, trust, and PS.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Trust encourages the formal reporting of medical errors whereas PS encourages learning from mistakes and improving care to reduce future errors (and consequently the number of reported errors). Leaders who understand employees' unique needs, express confidence in employees' abilities, and encourage employees to share their ideas, create inclusive and trusting work environments that encourage PS and ultimately help reduce reported medical errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Although trust and psychological safety (PS) are critical for improving patient safety and medical error reporting, little is known about how they work together and how health care systems promote PS.

Purpose: This study examined how leadership for self-worth, inclusion, and trust may work together to foster PS and how this influences medical error reporting.

Approach: Data were collected in 2019 from 373 employees (24% response rate) in 85 hospital departments (54% response rate) in a nonprofit health care system in the eastern United States. Constructs were operationalized at the department level.

Results: Negative binomial path model results found several direct effects. Leadership for self-worth was positively associated with inclusion, inclusion was positively associated with trust and PS, trust was positively associated with reported medical errors, and PS was negatively associated with reported medical errors. Indirect effects uncovered leadership for self-worth was positively associated with PS by enhancing inclusion. In addition, leadership for self-worth increased inclusion, which increased trust and ultimately encouraged PS. Leadership for self-worth was associated with fewer reported medical errors through increasing inclusion, trust, and PS.

Practical implications: Trust encourages the formal reporting of medical errors whereas PS encourages learning from mistakes and improving care to reduce future errors (and consequently the number of reported errors). Leaders who understand employees' unique needs, express confidence in employees' abilities, and encourage employees to share their ideas, create inclusive and trusting work environments that encourage PS and ultimately help reduce reported medical errors.

领导对自我价值感、包容、信任和心理安全对医疗差错报告的影响。
背景:尽管信任和心理安全(PS)对于提高患者安全和医疗错误报告至关重要,但人们对它们如何共同作用以及卫生保健系统如何促进PS知之甚少。目的:本研究探讨了自我价值、包容和信任的领导如何共同促进PS以及这如何影响医疗错误报告。方法:2019年从美国东部一家非营利性医疗保健系统的85个医院部门(54%的回复率)的373名员工(24%的回复率)中收集数据。构建在部门层面上进行操作。结果:负二项路径模型结果发现了几个直接影响。领导自我价值感与包容正相关,包容与信任、个人价值感正相关,信任与报告的医疗差错正相关,个人价值感与报告的医疗差错负相关。间接效应发现,领导对自我价值感的影响通过增强包容与自我价值感正相关。此外,自我价值的领导增加了包容,这增加了信任,最终鼓励了PS。自我价值的领导通过增加包容、信任和PS,与更少的医疗错误报告有关。实际意义:信任鼓励正式报告医疗错误,而PS鼓励从错误中学习和改善护理,以减少未来的错误(从而减少报告的错误数量)。领导者了解员工的独特需求,表达对员工能力的信心,并鼓励员工分享他们的想法,创造包容和信任的工作环境,鼓励PS,并最终帮助减少报告的医疗事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信