Association of Frailty and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes in Older U.S. Veterans.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dominique M Tosi, Marlena C Fernandez, Shivaan Oomrigar, Lorena P Burton, Iriana S Hammel, Andrew Quartin, Jorge G Ruiz
{"title":"Association of Frailty and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes in Older U.S. Veterans.","authors":"Dominique M Tosi, Marlena C Fernandez, Shivaan Oomrigar, Lorena P Burton, Iriana S Hammel, Andrew Quartin, Jorge G Ruiz","doi":"10.1177/10499091231171389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Determine the association between frailty and immediate survival of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in older Veterans. Secondary outcomes: compare in-hospital mortality, duration of resuscitation efforts, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, neurologic outcomes, and discharge disposition between frail and non-frail Veterans. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study including Veterans 50 years and older, who were \"Full Code\" and had in-hospital cardiac arrest between 7/1/2017 and 6/30/2020, at the Miami VAMC. Frailty Index for the VA (VA-FI) was used to determine frailty status. Immediate Survival was determined by return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and in-hospital mortality was determined by all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between frail and non-frail Veterans using chi-square test. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and previous hospitalizations, we used multivariate binomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals to analyze the relationship between immediate survival and frailty, and in-hospital mortality and frailty. <b>Results:</b> 91% Veterans were non-Hispanic, 49% Caucasian, 96% male, mean age 70.7 ± 8.5 years, 73% frail and 27% non-frail. Seventy-six (65.5%) Veterans had ROSC, without difference by frailty status (<i>P</i> = .891). There was no difference based on frailty status of in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, or neurologic outcomes. Frail and non-frail Veterans had resuscitation efforts lasting the same amount of time. <b>Conclusions and Implications:</b> CPR outcomes were not different depending on frailty status in our Veteran population. With these results, we cannot use frailty - as measured by the VA-FI - as a prognosticator of CPR outcomes in Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"398-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231171389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Determine the association between frailty and immediate survival of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in older Veterans. Secondary outcomes: compare in-hospital mortality, duration of resuscitation efforts, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, neurologic outcomes, and discharge disposition between frail and non-frail Veterans. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including Veterans 50 years and older, who were "Full Code" and had in-hospital cardiac arrest between 7/1/2017 and 6/30/2020, at the Miami VAMC. Frailty Index for the VA (VA-FI) was used to determine frailty status. Immediate Survival was determined by return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and in-hospital mortality was determined by all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between frail and non-frail Veterans using chi-square test. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and previous hospitalizations, we used multivariate binomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals to analyze the relationship between immediate survival and frailty, and in-hospital mortality and frailty. Results: 91% Veterans were non-Hispanic, 49% Caucasian, 96% male, mean age 70.7 ± 8.5 years, 73% frail and 27% non-frail. Seventy-six (65.5%) Veterans had ROSC, without difference by frailty status (P = .891). There was no difference based on frailty status of in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, or neurologic outcomes. Frail and non-frail Veterans had resuscitation efforts lasting the same amount of time. Conclusions and Implications: CPR outcomes were not different depending on frailty status in our Veteran population. With these results, we cannot use frailty - as measured by the VA-FI - as a prognosticator of CPR outcomes in Veterans.

美国老年退伍军人体弱与心肺复苏结果的关系。
目标:确定老年退伍军人的虚弱程度与心肺复苏术(CPR)即时存活率之间的关系:确定老年退伍军人的虚弱程度与心肺复苏(CPR)的即时存活率之间的关系。次要结果:比较虚弱退伍军人和非虚弱退伍军人的院内死亡率、复苏持续时间、住院和重症监护室 (ICU) 病程、神经系统结果和出院处置。方法:回顾性队列研究:回顾性队列研究包括迈阿密退伍军人医疗中心的 50 岁及以上退伍军人,他们在 2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间 "全代码 "并发生院内心脏骤停。退伍军人虚弱指数(VA-FI)用于确定虚弱状态。立即存活率由自发循环恢复(ROSC)决定,院内死亡率由全因死亡率决定。我们使用卡方检验比较了虚弱退伍军人和非虚弱退伍军人的结果。在对年龄、性别、种族和既往住院情况进行调整后,我们使用带 95% 置信区间的多变量二项逻辑回归分析了即时存活率与虚弱程度、院内死亡率与虚弱程度之间的关系。结果显示91%的退伍军人为非西班牙裔,49%为高加索人,96%为男性,平均年龄(70.7 ± 8.5)岁,73%为体弱者,27%为非体弱者。76名退伍军人(65.5%)获得了ROSC,不同体弱状况的退伍军人之间没有差异(P = .891)。在院内死亡率、出院处置或神经系统结果方面,虚弱状态没有差异。虚弱和非虚弱退伍军人的复苏时间相同。结论与启示:在我们的退伍军人群体中,心肺复苏的结果并不因虚弱状态而异。根据这些结果,我们不能使用退伍军人体弱指数(VA-FI)来预测退伍军人的心肺复苏结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信