A cross-sectional survey on fruit bat-human interaction in Pakistan; one health perspective.

Touseef Ahmed, Osama Bin Amjad, Haseeb Ahmed, Shafique Ahmed, Jamil Ahmed Ansari, Robert Ricketson, Muhammad Farooq Tahir
{"title":"A cross-sectional survey on fruit bat-human interaction in Pakistan; one health perspective.","authors":"Touseef Ahmed, Osama Bin Amjad, Haseeb Ahmed, Shafique Ahmed, Jamil Ahmed Ansari, Robert Ricketson, Muhammad Farooq Tahir","doi":"10.1186/s42522-023-00078-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several factors, such as residential area topography, population density, and lack of infrastructure, were hypothesized to contribute toward respondents' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding disease transmission. The present study was designed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perception of human-fruit bat interaction by student respondents located in ten districts within the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted by trained enumerators in academic institutions using a structured questionnaire among student respondents (n = 1466), living in two topographically distinct (Mountainous and Plain) residential regions of the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) provinces in Pakistan regarding their history of bat encounters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed that 71.4% of the 1466 respondents had observed bats in their geographic region. 21% of our survey respondents reported bat bites incidents over their lifetime, but only 40% actively sought medical care for wound management despite reporting they had a close family member that had contracted rabies (27-35%). Our generalized linear models (GLMs) highlighted that a respondent residing in a residential region had a greater association with reporting a suspected bat bite over their lifetime and reported rabies victims in both near and extended family members (OR = -0,85, p-value = 0.03, 95% CI). This appeared to be due to delaying consulting a doctor or medical facility for treatment following a suspected bat bite in the topographic residential group as compared to the respondents in the provincial residential group (OR 1.12, p-value = 0.04, 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate the necessity of a One Health comprehensive surveillance system in Pakistan for emerging and re-emerging zoonotic pathogens in Pteropodidae.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"5 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9973238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-023-00078-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several factors, such as residential area topography, population density, and lack of infrastructure, were hypothesized to contribute toward respondents' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding disease transmission. The present study was designed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and perception of human-fruit bat interaction by student respondents located in ten districts within the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces in Pakistan.

Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by trained enumerators in academic institutions using a structured questionnaire among student respondents (n = 1466), living in two topographically distinct (Mountainous and Plain) residential regions of the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) provinces in Pakistan regarding their history of bat encounters.

Results: Our study revealed that 71.4% of the 1466 respondents had observed bats in their geographic region. 21% of our survey respondents reported bat bites incidents over their lifetime, but only 40% actively sought medical care for wound management despite reporting they had a close family member that had contracted rabies (27-35%). Our generalized linear models (GLMs) highlighted that a respondent residing in a residential region had a greater association with reporting a suspected bat bite over their lifetime and reported rabies victims in both near and extended family members (OR = -0,85, p-value = 0.03, 95% CI). This appeared to be due to delaying consulting a doctor or medical facility for treatment following a suspected bat bite in the topographic residential group as compared to the respondents in the provincial residential group (OR 1.12, p-value = 0.04, 95% CI).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate the necessity of a One Health comprehensive surveillance system in Pakistan for emerging and re-emerging zoonotic pathogens in Pteropodidae.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴基斯坦果蝠与人类互动的横断面调查;一个健康视角。
调查目的假设居住区地形、人口密度和基础设施缺乏等因素会影响受访者对疾病传播的认识、态度和做法。本研究旨在调查巴基斯坦旁遮普省和开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省十个地区的学生受访者对人-果蝠互动的知识、态度和看法:在巴基斯坦旁遮普省和开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省(KPK)的两个地形不同(山区和平原)的居民区,由经过培训的调查员在学术机构中使用结构化问卷对学生受访者(n = 1466)进行了一次横断面调查,了解他们遇到蝙蝠的历史:我们的研究显示,在 1466 名受访者中,有 71.4% 的人曾在其所在地区观察到过蝙蝠。21%的受访者报告在其一生中发生过被蝙蝠咬伤的事件,但只有40%的受访者积极就医处理伤口,尽管他们报告有近亲家庭成员感染了狂犬病(27-35%)。我们的广义线性模型(GLMs)显示,居住在居民区的受访者在一生中报告疑似蝙蝠咬伤事件与报告近亲和大家庭成员中狂犬病患者的关联度更高(OR = -0,85,P 值 = 0.03,95% CI)。这似乎是由于地形居住组的受访者与省级居住组的受访者相比,在被疑似蝙蝠咬伤后延迟看医生或到医疗机构接受治疗(OR 1.12,p 值 = 0.04,95% CI):我们的研究结果表明,巴基斯坦有必要针对翼足目蝙蝠科新出现和再次出现的人畜共患病原体建立一个综合健康监测系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信