Inoka De Silva, Melissa Wee, Carlos S Cabalag, Rebecca Fong, Kevin Tran, Michael Wu, Ann Schloithe, Tim Bright, Cuong Phu Duong, David I Watson
{"title":"Para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia following esophagectomy-the new price of minimally invasive surgery?","authors":"Inoka De Silva, Melissa Wee, Carlos S Cabalag, Rebecca Fong, Kevin Tran, Michael Wu, Ann Schloithe, Tim Bright, Cuong Phu Duong, David I Watson","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal Cancer is the seventh commonest cancer worldwide with poor overall survival. Significant morbidity related to open esophagectomy has driven practice toward hybrid, totally minimally invasive and robotic procedures. With the increase in minimally invasive approaches, it has been suggested that there might be an increased incidence of subsequent para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia. To assess the incidence, modifiable risk factors and association with operative approach of this emerging complication, we evaluated outcomes following esophagectomy from two Australian Centers. Prospectively collected databases were examined to identify patients who developed versus did not develop a para-conduit hernia. Patient characteristics, disease factors, treatment factors, operative and post-operative factors were compared for these two groups. A total of 24 of 297 patients who underwent esophagectomy were diagnosed with a symptomatic para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia (8.1%). The significant risk factor for hernia was a minimally invasive abdominal approach (70.8% vs. 35.5%; P = 0.004, odds ratio = 12.876, 95% CI 2.214-74.89). Minimally invasive thoracic approaches were not associated with increased risk. Minimally invasive abdominal approaches to esophagectomy doubled the risk of developing a para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia. Effective operative solutions to address this complication are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Esophageal Cancer is the seventh commonest cancer worldwide with poor overall survival. Significant morbidity related to open esophagectomy has driven practice toward hybrid, totally minimally invasive and robotic procedures. With the increase in minimally invasive approaches, it has been suggested that there might be an increased incidence of subsequent para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia. To assess the incidence, modifiable risk factors and association with operative approach of this emerging complication, we evaluated outcomes following esophagectomy from two Australian Centers. Prospectively collected databases were examined to identify patients who developed versus did not develop a para-conduit hernia. Patient characteristics, disease factors, treatment factors, operative and post-operative factors were compared for these two groups. A total of 24 of 297 patients who underwent esophagectomy were diagnosed with a symptomatic para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia (8.1%). The significant risk factor for hernia was a minimally invasive abdominal approach (70.8% vs. 35.5%; P = 0.004, odds ratio = 12.876, 95% CI 2.214-74.89). Minimally invasive thoracic approaches were not associated with increased risk. Minimally invasive abdominal approaches to esophagectomy doubled the risk of developing a para-conduit diaphragmatic hernia. Effective operative solutions to address this complication are required.
食管癌是全球第七大常见癌症,总体生存率较低。与开放式食管切除术相关的显著发病率推动了混合、全微创和机器人手术的实践。随着微创入路的增加,可能会增加随后的导管旁膈疝的发生率。为了评估这种新出现的并发症的发生率、可改变的危险因素以及与手术入路的关系,我们评估了两个澳大利亚中心的食管切除术后的结果。对前瞻性收集的数据库进行检查,以确定发生与未发生导管旁疝的患者。比较两组患者特点、疾病因素、治疗因素、手术及术后因素。297例食管切除术患者中有24例被诊断为症状性导管旁膈疝(8.1%)。疝的显著危险因素是微创腹部入路(70.8% vs. 35.5%;P = 0.004, or = 12.876, 95% CI 2.214 - -74.89)。微创胸椎入路与风险增加无关。微创腹腔食管切除术使发生导管旁膈疝的风险增加一倍。需要有效的手术解决方案来解决这一并发症。