Comparison of the potency of nortriptyline and mirtazapine on gastrointestinal symptoms, the level of anxiety and depression in patients with functional dyspepsia.

Q3 Medicine
Negin Jamshidfar, Mostafa Hamdieh, Pegah Eslami, Sepideh Batebi, Amir Sadeghi, Reyhaneh Rastegar, Arash Dooghaie Moghadam, Abbas Masjedi Arani
{"title":"Comparison of the potency of nortriptyline and mirtazapine on gastrointestinal symptoms, the level of anxiety and depression in patients with functional dyspepsia.","authors":"Negin Jamshidfar,&nbsp;Mostafa Hamdieh,&nbsp;Pegah Eslami,&nbsp;Sepideh Batebi,&nbsp;Amir Sadeghi,&nbsp;Reyhaneh Rastegar,&nbsp;Arash Dooghaie Moghadam,&nbsp;Abbas Masjedi Arani","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v16i1.2513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In the current clinical trial study, the potency of mirtazapine and nortriptyline was compared in patients with Functional Dyspepsia (FD) who had anxiety or depression.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>FD usually accompanies other psychosocial disorders. According to previous studies, among these disorders, anxiety and depression have the most correlation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was organized in Taleghani hospital (Tehran, Iran). In two parallel groups, 42 patients were treated for 12 weeks, with 22 patients receiving 7.5 mg of mirtazapine and 20 patients receiving 25 mg of nortriptyline per day. To gain robust results, the patients with a positive history of antidepressant therapy, organic diseases, alcohol abuse, pregnancy, and major psychiatric disorders were excluded from the study. The subjects were examined by three questionnaires, including Nepean and Hamilton questionnaires. The patients were asked to answer the questions three times during the study: once before the onset of the treatment, second during the treatment, and third at the end of the treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on Gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations, mirtazapine, in comparison to nortriptyline could significantly suppress the signs and symptoms of FD, including epigastric pains (P=0.02), belching (P=0.004), and bloating (P=0.01). Although the results from the use of mirtazapine compared to the use of nortriptyline (P=0.002) showed a lower mean depression score on the Hamilton questionnaire, no significant differences were found between the effects of these drugs on the anxiety scale of patients (P=0.091).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mirtazapine is more effective for GI symptoms related to gastric emptying. Considering the level of anxiety, mirtazapine, compared to nortriptyline, revealed better outcomes in FD patients suffering from depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"16 1","pages":"468-477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/a1/GHFBB-16-468.PMC10105507.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v16i1.2513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In the current clinical trial study, the potency of mirtazapine and nortriptyline was compared in patients with Functional Dyspepsia (FD) who had anxiety or depression.

Background: FD usually accompanies other psychosocial disorders. According to previous studies, among these disorders, anxiety and depression have the most correlation.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was organized in Taleghani hospital (Tehran, Iran). In two parallel groups, 42 patients were treated for 12 weeks, with 22 patients receiving 7.5 mg of mirtazapine and 20 patients receiving 25 mg of nortriptyline per day. To gain robust results, the patients with a positive history of antidepressant therapy, organic diseases, alcohol abuse, pregnancy, and major psychiatric disorders were excluded from the study. The subjects were examined by three questionnaires, including Nepean and Hamilton questionnaires. The patients were asked to answer the questions three times during the study: once before the onset of the treatment, second during the treatment, and third at the end of the treatment.

Results: Based on Gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations, mirtazapine, in comparison to nortriptyline could significantly suppress the signs and symptoms of FD, including epigastric pains (P=0.02), belching (P=0.004), and bloating (P=0.01). Although the results from the use of mirtazapine compared to the use of nortriptyline (P=0.002) showed a lower mean depression score on the Hamilton questionnaire, no significant differences were found between the effects of these drugs on the anxiety scale of patients (P=0.091).

Conclusion: Mirtazapine is more effective for GI symptoms related to gastric emptying. Considering the level of anxiety, mirtazapine, compared to nortriptyline, revealed better outcomes in FD patients suffering from depression.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

去甲替林与米氮平对功能性消化不良患者胃肠道症状、焦虑和抑郁水平的影响比较
目的:在目前的临床试验研究中,比较米氮平和去甲替林在患有焦虑或抑郁的功能性消化不良(FD)患者中的效价。背景:FD通常伴有其他社会心理障碍。根据以往的研究,在这些疾病中,焦虑和抑郁的相关性最大。方法:本随机临床试验在伊朗德黑兰Taleghani医院组织。在两个平行组中,42名患者接受了12周的治疗,其中22名患者每天接受7.5 mg米氮平治疗,20名患者每天接受25 mg去甲替林治疗。为了获得可靠的结果,有抗抑郁治疗、器质性疾病、酗酒、怀孕和重大精神障碍病史的患者被排除在研究之外。采用Nepean问卷和Hamilton问卷三份问卷对受试者进行调查。在研究期间,患者被要求回答三次问题:一次在治疗开始前,第二次在治疗期间,第三次在治疗结束时。结果:以胃肠道(GI)表现为基础,米氮平与去甲替林相比,可显著抑制FD的体征和症状,包括胃脘痛(P=0.02)、嗳气(P=0.004)、腹胀(P=0.01)。虽然使用米氮平与使用去甲替林的结果(P=0.002)显示汉密尔顿问卷的平均抑郁评分较低,但两种药物对患者焦虑量表的影响无显著差异(P=0.091)。结论:米氮平对胃排空相关的胃肠道症状更有效。考虑到焦虑水平,与去甲替林相比,米氮平在患有抑郁症的FD患者中显示出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信