Exceeding the Ordinary: A Framework for Examining Teams Across the Extremeness Continuum and Its Impact on Future Research.

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Jan B Schmutz, Nadine Bienefeld, M Travis Maynard, Ramón Rico
{"title":"Exceeding the Ordinary: A Framework for Examining Teams Across the Extremeness Continuum and Its Impact on Future Research.","authors":"Jan B Schmutz,&nbsp;Nadine Bienefeld,&nbsp;M Travis Maynard,&nbsp;Ramón Rico","doi":"10.1177/10596011221150756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Work teams increasingly face unprecedented challenges in volatile, uncertain, complex, and often ambiguous environments. In response, team researchers have begun to focus more on teams whose work revolves around mitigating risks in these dynamic environments. Some highly insightful contributions to team research and organizational studies have originated from investigating teams that face unconventional or extreme events. Despite this increased attention to extreme teams, however, a comprehensive theoretical framework is missing. We introduce such a framework that envisions <i>team extremeness</i> as a continuous, multidimensional variable consisting of <i>environmental extremeness</i> (i.e., external team context) and <i>task extremeness</i> (i.e., internal team context). The proposed framework allows every team to be placed on the team extremeness continuum, bridging the gap between literature on extreme and more traditional teams. Furthermore, we present six propositions addressing how team extremeness may interact with team processes, emergent states, and outcomes using core variables for team effectiveness and the well-established input-mediator-output-input model to structure our theorizing. Finally, we outline some potential directions for future research by elaborating on temporal considerations (i.e., patterns and trajectories), measurement approaches, and consideration of multilevel relationships involving team extremeness. We hope that our theoretical framework and theorizing can create a path forward, stimulating future research within the organizational team literature to further examine the impact of team extremeness on team dynamics and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"48 2","pages":"581-628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/5f/10.1177_10596011221150756.PMC10108401.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221150756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Work teams increasingly face unprecedented challenges in volatile, uncertain, complex, and often ambiguous environments. In response, team researchers have begun to focus more on teams whose work revolves around mitigating risks in these dynamic environments. Some highly insightful contributions to team research and organizational studies have originated from investigating teams that face unconventional or extreme events. Despite this increased attention to extreme teams, however, a comprehensive theoretical framework is missing. We introduce such a framework that envisions team extremeness as a continuous, multidimensional variable consisting of environmental extremeness (i.e., external team context) and task extremeness (i.e., internal team context). The proposed framework allows every team to be placed on the team extremeness continuum, bridging the gap between literature on extreme and more traditional teams. Furthermore, we present six propositions addressing how team extremeness may interact with team processes, emergent states, and outcomes using core variables for team effectiveness and the well-established input-mediator-output-input model to structure our theorizing. Finally, we outline some potential directions for future research by elaborating on temporal considerations (i.e., patterns and trajectories), measurement approaches, and consideration of multilevel relationships involving team extremeness. We hope that our theoretical framework and theorizing can create a path forward, stimulating future research within the organizational team literature to further examine the impact of team extremeness on team dynamics and effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超越平凡:一个跨越极端连续体检验团队的框架及其对未来研究的影响。
在多变的、不确定的、复杂的、经常是模糊的环境中,工作团队越来越多地面临前所未有的挑战。作为回应,团队研究人员已经开始更多地关注那些在这些动态环境中围绕降低风险进行工作的团队。对团队研究和组织研究的一些极具洞察力的贡献源于对面临非常规或极端事件的团队的调查。然而,尽管对极端团队的关注越来越多,但缺乏一个全面的理论框架。我们引入了这样一个框架,该框架将团队极端性设想为一个连续的多维变量,由环境极端性(即外部团队背景)和任务极端性(即内部团队背景)组成。所建议的框架允许将每个团队置于团队极限连续体上,弥合了关于极限和更传统团队的文献之间的差距。此外,我们提出了六个命题,利用团队有效性的核心变量和完善的输入-中介-输出-输入模型来构建我们的理论,解决团队极端如何与团队过程、紧急状态和结果相互作用。最后,我们通过阐述时间因素(即模式和轨迹)、测量方法和考虑涉及团队极端的多层次关系,概述了未来研究的一些潜在方向。我们希望我们的理论框架和理论化可以创造一个前进的路径,激发未来在组织团队文献中进一步研究团队极端对团队动力和有效性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信