Treatment of C5 Palsy: An International Survey of Peripheral Nerve Surgeons.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1177/21925682231171853
Daniel Lubelski, Andrew M Hersh, James Feghali, Daniel M Sciubba, Timothy Witham, Ali Bydon, Nicholas Theodore, Allan J Belzberg
{"title":"Treatment of C5 Palsy: An International Survey of Peripheral Nerve Surgeons.","authors":"Daniel Lubelski, Andrew M Hersh, James Feghali, Daniel M Sciubba, Timothy Witham, Ali Bydon, Nicholas Theodore, Allan J Belzberg","doi":"10.1177/21925682231171853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>International survey.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>C5 palsy (C5P) is a neurological complication affecting 5-10% of patients after cervical decompression surgery. Most cases improve with conservative treatment; however, nearly 20% of patients may be left with residual deficits. Guidelines are lacking on C5P management and timing of surgical intervention. Therefore, we sought to survey peripheral nerve surgeons on their management of C5P.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed centered around a patient with C5P after posterior cervical decompression and fusion. Questions included surgeon demographics, diagnostic modalities, and timing and choice of operation. Responses were summarized and the chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to examine differences across specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 surgeons responded to the survey, of which 59 (38%) indicated that they manage C5P cases. Average time prior to operating was 4.5 ± 2.2 months for complete injuries and 6.6 ± 3.2 months for partial injuries, with neurosurgeons significantly more likely to wait longer periods for complete (<i>P</i> = .01) and partial injuries (<i>P</i> = .03). Foraminotomies were selected by 19% of surgeons, while 92% selected nerve transfers. Transfer of the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve was the most common choice (81%), followed by transfer of the radial nerve to the axillary nerve (58%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consensus exists among peripheral nerve surgeons on the use of nerve transfers for surgical treatment in cases with severe motor weakness failing to improve. Most surgeons advocate for early intervention in complete injuries. Disagreement concerns the type of nerve transfer employed, timing of surgery, and efficacy of foraminotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231171853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: International survey.

Objectives: C5 palsy (C5P) is a neurological complication affecting 5-10% of patients after cervical decompression surgery. Most cases improve with conservative treatment; however, nearly 20% of patients may be left with residual deficits. Guidelines are lacking on C5P management and timing of surgical intervention. Therefore, we sought to survey peripheral nerve surgeons on their management of C5P.

Methods: An online survey was distributed centered around a patient with C5P after posterior cervical decompression and fusion. Questions included surgeon demographics, diagnostic modalities, and timing and choice of operation. Responses were summarized and the chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to examine differences across specialties.

Results: A total of 154 surgeons responded to the survey, of which 59 (38%) indicated that they manage C5P cases. Average time prior to operating was 4.5 ± 2.2 months for complete injuries and 6.6 ± 3.2 months for partial injuries, with neurosurgeons significantly more likely to wait longer periods for complete (P = .01) and partial injuries (P = .03). Foraminotomies were selected by 19% of surgeons, while 92% selected nerve transfers. Transfer of the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve was the most common choice (81%), followed by transfer of the radial nerve to the axillary nerve (58%).

Conclusion: Consensus exists among peripheral nerve surgeons on the use of nerve transfers for surgical treatment in cases with severe motor weakness failing to improve. Most surgeons advocate for early intervention in complete injuries. Disagreement concerns the type of nerve transfer employed, timing of surgery, and efficacy of foraminotomy.

C5 麻痹的治疗:周围神经外科医生国际调查。
研究设计国际调查:C5麻痹(C5P)是一种神经系统并发症,影响着5%-10%颈椎减压手术后的患者。大多数病例经保守治疗后会好转,但近20%的患者可能会留下后遗症。目前还缺乏有关 C5P 处理和手术干预时机的指南。因此,我们试图调查周围神经外科医生对 C5P 的处理方法:方法:我们围绕一名颈椎后路减压融合术后的 C5P 患者发放了一份在线调查。问题包括外科医生的人口统计学特征、诊断方式、手术时机和选择。我们对回复进行了汇总,并使用卡方检验(chi-squared)和Kruskal-Wallis H检验(Kruskal-Wallis H tests)来检验不同专业之间的差异:共有 154 名外科医生对调查做出了回复,其中 59 人(38%)表示他们负责处理 C5P 病例。完全损伤手术前的平均时间为 4.5 ± 2.2 个月,部分损伤手术前的平均时间为 6.6 ± 3.2 个月,神经外科医生在完全损伤(P = .01)和部分损伤(P = .03)时等待时间更长。19%的外科医生选择了椎板切开术,而92%的外科医生选择了神经转移术。将尺神经转移到肌皮神经是最常见的选择(81%),其次是将桡神经转移到腋神经(58%):结论:外周神经外科医生在使用神经转移手术治疗严重运动无力且病情未见好转的病例方面已达成共识。大多数外科医生主张对完全性损伤进行早期干预。对于神经转移的类型、手术时机和椎板切除术的疗效存在分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信