Protocol on medico-legal documentation of solitary confinement.

Marie Brasholt, Nora Sveaass, Pau Pérez Sales, Hugo Marboeuf, Ergün Cakal, Elna Søndergaard
{"title":"Protocol on medico-legal documentation of solitary confinement.","authors":"Marie Brasholt,&nbsp;Nora Sveaass,&nbsp;Pau Pérez Sales,&nbsp;Hugo Marboeuf,&nbsp;Ergün Cakal,&nbsp;Elna Søndergaard","doi":"10.7146/torture.v33i1.130739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This Protocol originates from a joint project regarding documentation of psychological torture initiated by the Public Committee against Torture in Israel (PCATI), REDRESS and DIGNITY - Danish Institute Against Torture (DIGNITY) in 2015 after the Copenhagen Conference on Psychologi-cal Torture. The project is a vehicle to estab-lish a common understanding between health and legal professions as to how to best ensure the most accurate documentation of torture.The aim of the Protocol is to improve docu-mentation of solitary confinement and therefore to clarify the facts of the case so that stron-ger legal claims can subsequently be submitted to local and international complaints mecha-nisms. The Protocol has been developed based on a methodology involving a compilation and review of legal and health knowledge on soli-tary confinement and discussions among the authors and in a group of international experts.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This Protocol is cognisant of the significance of the specific social, cultural and political contexts in which solitary confinement is used. We hope that this Protocol will assist in the discussions between the various stakeholders and provide guidance on what can be documented and how to doc-ument torture.</p>","PeriodicalId":75230,"journal":{"name":"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture","volume":"33 1","pages":"92-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v33i1.130739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This Protocol originates from a joint project regarding documentation of psychological torture initiated by the Public Committee against Torture in Israel (PCATI), REDRESS and DIGNITY - Danish Institute Against Torture (DIGNITY) in 2015 after the Copenhagen Conference on Psychologi-cal Torture. The project is a vehicle to estab-lish a common understanding between health and legal professions as to how to best ensure the most accurate documentation of torture.The aim of the Protocol is to improve docu-mentation of solitary confinement and therefore to clarify the facts of the case so that stron-ger legal claims can subsequently be submitted to local and international complaints mecha-nisms. The Protocol has been developed based on a methodology involving a compilation and review of legal and health knowledge on soli-tary confinement and discussions among the authors and in a group of international experts.

Methods and results: This Protocol is cognisant of the significance of the specific social, cultural and political contexts in which solitary confinement is used. We hope that this Protocol will assist in the discussions between the various stakeholders and provide guidance on what can be documented and how to doc-ument torture.

单独监禁的医疗法律文件议定书。
本议定书源于2015年哥本哈根心理酷刑问题会议后,由以色列禁止酷刑公共委员会(PCATI)、REDRESS和尊严-丹麦禁止酷刑(尊严)研究所发起的关于心理酷刑记录的联合项目。该项目是在卫生和法律专业人员之间就如何最好地确保最准确地记录酷刑问题达成共识的一个工具。该议定书的目的是改进单独监禁的记录,从而澄清案件的事实,以便随后可以向当地和国际申诉机制提出更有力的法律要求。该议定书是根据一种方法制定的,该方法涉及对单独监禁的法律和健康知识进行汇编和审查,并由作者和国际专家小组进行讨论。方法和结果:本议定书认识到使用单独监禁的特定社会、文化和政治背景的重要性。我们希望本议定书将有助于各利益攸关方之间的讨论,并就可以记录的内容和如何记录酷刑提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信