Validating cuffless continuous blood pressure monitoring devices

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jiun-Ruey Hu MD, MPH , Gabrielle Martin BS , Sanjna Iyengar BS , Lara C. Kovell MD , Timothy B. Plante MD, MHS , Noud van Helmond MD, PhD , Richard A. Dart MD , Tammy M. Brady MD, PhD , Ruth-Alma N. Turkson-Ocran PhD, MPH, APRN , Stephen P. Juraschek MD, PhD
{"title":"Validating cuffless continuous blood pressure monitoring devices","authors":"Jiun-Ruey Hu MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Gabrielle Martin BS ,&nbsp;Sanjna Iyengar BS ,&nbsp;Lara C. Kovell MD ,&nbsp;Timothy B. Plante MD, MHS ,&nbsp;Noud van Helmond MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Richard A. Dart MD ,&nbsp;Tammy M. Brady MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ruth-Alma N. Turkson-Ocran PhD, MPH, APRN ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Juraschek MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cuff-based home blood pressure (BP) devices, which have been the standard for BP monitoring for decades, are limited by physical discomfort, convenience, and their ability to capture BP variability and patterns between intermittent readings. In recent years, cuffless BP devices, which do not require cuff inflation around a limb, have entered the market, offering the promise of continuous beat-to-beat measurement of BP. These devices take advantage of a variety of principles to determine BP, including (1) pulse arrival time, (2) pulse transit time, (3) pulse wave analysis, (4) volume clamping, and (5) applanation tonometry. Because BP is calculated indirectly, these devices require calibration with cuff-based devices at regular intervals. Unfortunately, the pace of regulation of these devices has failed to match the speed of innovation and direct availability to patient consumers. There is an urgent need to develop a consensus on standards by which cuffless BP devices can be tested for accuracy. In this narrative review, we describe the landscape of cuffless BP devices, summarize the current status of validation protocols, and provide recommendations for an ideal validation process for these devices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971997/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cuff-based home blood pressure (BP) devices, which have been the standard for BP monitoring for decades, are limited by physical discomfort, convenience, and their ability to capture BP variability and patterns between intermittent readings. In recent years, cuffless BP devices, which do not require cuff inflation around a limb, have entered the market, offering the promise of continuous beat-to-beat measurement of BP. These devices take advantage of a variety of principles to determine BP, including (1) pulse arrival time, (2) pulse transit time, (3) pulse wave analysis, (4) volume clamping, and (5) applanation tonometry. Because BP is calculated indirectly, these devices require calibration with cuff-based devices at regular intervals. Unfortunately, the pace of regulation of these devices has failed to match the speed of innovation and direct availability to patient consumers. There is an urgent need to develop a consensus on standards by which cuffless BP devices can be tested for accuracy. In this narrative review, we describe the landscape of cuffless BP devices, summarize the current status of validation protocols, and provide recommendations for an ideal validation process for these devices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

验证无袖带连续血压监测装置
几十年来,基于袖带的家庭血压(BP)设备一直是血压监测的标准,但由于身体不适、方便以及捕捉间歇性读数之间血压变化和模式的能力,这些设备受到了限制。近年来,不需要在肢体周围进行袖带充气的无袖带BP设备已进入市场,有望对BP进行连续逐搏测量。这些设备利用各种原理来确定BP,包括(1)脉冲到达时间、(2)脉冲通过时间、(3)脉搏波分析、(4)容积钳位和(5)压平眼压计。由于血压是间接计算的,因此这些设备需要定期使用基于袖带的设备进行校准。不幸的是,这些设备的监管速度未能与创新速度和患者消费者的直接可用性相匹配。迫切需要就无套BP装置的准确性测试标准达成共识。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们描述了无袖带BP设备的前景,总结了验证协议的现状,并为这些设备的理想验证过程提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信