Nutrition risk varies according to social network type: data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Christine Marie Mills, Heather H Keller, Vincent Gerard DePaul, Catherine Donnelly
{"title":"Nutrition risk varies according to social network type: data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.","authors":"Christine Marie Mills,&nbsp;Heather H Keller,&nbsp;Vincent Gerard DePaul,&nbsp;Catherine Donnelly","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-002112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There were two primary objectives, namely: (1) to determine the social network types that Canadian adults aged 45 and older belong to and (2) to discover if social network type is associated with nutrition risk scores and the prevalence of high nutrition risk.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>17 051 Canadians aged 45 years and older with data from baseline and first follow-up of the CLSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLSA participants could be classified into one of seven different social network types that varied from restricted to diverse. We found a statistically significant association between social network type and nutrition risk scores and percentage of individuals at high nutrition risk at both time points. Individuals with restricted social networks had lower nutrition risk scores and are more likely to be at nutrition risk, whereas individuals with diverse social networks had higher nutrition risk scores and are less likely to be at nutrition risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social network type was associated with nutrition risk in this representative sample of Canadian middle-aged and older adults. Providing adults with opportunities to deepen and diversify their social networks may decrease the prevalence of nutrition risk. Individuals with more restricted networks should be proactively screened for nutrition risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/75/fmch-2022-002112.PMC9950914.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-002112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There were two primary objectives, namely: (1) to determine the social network types that Canadian adults aged 45 and older belong to and (2) to discover if social network type is associated with nutrition risk scores and the prevalence of high nutrition risk.

Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

Participants: 17 051 Canadians aged 45 years and older with data from baseline and first follow-up of the CLSA.

Results: CLSA participants could be classified into one of seven different social network types that varied from restricted to diverse. We found a statistically significant association between social network type and nutrition risk scores and percentage of individuals at high nutrition risk at both time points. Individuals with restricted social networks had lower nutrition risk scores and are more likely to be at nutrition risk, whereas individuals with diverse social networks had higher nutrition risk scores and are less likely to be at nutrition risk.

Conclusions: Social network type was associated with nutrition risk in this representative sample of Canadian middle-aged and older adults. Providing adults with opportunities to deepen and diversify their social networks may decrease the prevalence of nutrition risk. Individuals with more restricted networks should be proactively screened for nutrition risk.

Abstract Image

营养风险根据社会网络类型而变化:来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究的数据。
目的:有两个主要目标,即:(1)确定加拿大45岁及以上成年人所属的社会网络类型;(2)发现社会网络类型是否与营养风险评分和高营养风险发生率相关。设计:回顾性横断面研究。背景:数据来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究(里昂证券)。参与者:17051名年龄在45岁及以上的加拿大人,数据来自基线和里昂证券的首次随访。结果:里昂证券的参与者可以被划分为七个不同的社会网络类型之一,从限制到多样化。我们发现,在两个时间点上,社会网络类型与营养风险评分和高营养风险个体百分比之间存在统计学上显著的关联。社交网络有限的个体营养风险得分较低,更有可能出现营养风险,而社交网络多样化的个体营养风险得分较高,出现营养风险的可能性较小。结论:社会网络类型与加拿大中老年成年人的营养风险相关。为成年人提供加深和多样化其社会网络的机会可能会降低营养风险的普遍性。社交网络较为有限的个人应主动筛查营养风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信