Factors Affecting Physicians' Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2196/34525
DaJuan Ferrell, Celeste Campos-Castillo
{"title":"Factors Affecting Physicians' Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study.","authors":"DaJuan Ferrell,&nbsp;Celeste Campos-Castillo","doi":"10.2196/34525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Largely absent from research on how users appraise the credibility of professionals as sources for the information they find on social media is work investigating factors shaping credibility within a specific profession, such as physicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We address debates about how physicians can show their credibility on social media depending on whether they employ a formal or casual appearance in their profile picture. Using prominence-interpretation theory, we posit that formal appearance will affect perceived credibility based on users' social context-specifically, whether they have a regular health care provider.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this experiment, we recruited 205 social media users using Amazon Mechanical Turk. We asked participants if they had a regular health care provider and then randomly assigned them to read 1 of 3 Twitter posts that varied only in the profile picture of the physician offering health advice. Next, we tasked participants with assessing the credibility of the physician and their likelihood of engaging with the tweet and the physician on Twitter. We used path analysis to assess whether participants having a regular health care provider impacted how the profile picture affected their ratings of the physician's credibility and their likelihood to engage with the tweet and physician on Twitter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the profile picture of a physician posting health advice in either formal or casual attire did not elicit significant differences in credibility, with ratings comparable to those having no profile image. Among participants assigned the formal appearance condition, those with a regular provider rated the physician higher on a credibility than those without, which led to stronger intentions to engage with the tweet and physician.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings add to existing research by showing how the social context of information seeking on social media shapes the credibility of a given professional. Practical implications for professionals engaging with the public on social media and combating false information include moving past debates about casual versus formal appearances and toward identifying ways to segment audiences based on factors like their backgrounds (eg, experiences with health care providers).</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"e34525"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987183/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/34525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Largely absent from research on how users appraise the credibility of professionals as sources for the information they find on social media is work investigating factors shaping credibility within a specific profession, such as physicians.

Objective: We address debates about how physicians can show their credibility on social media depending on whether they employ a formal or casual appearance in their profile picture. Using prominence-interpretation theory, we posit that formal appearance will affect perceived credibility based on users' social context-specifically, whether they have a regular health care provider.

Methods: For this experiment, we recruited 205 social media users using Amazon Mechanical Turk. We asked participants if they had a regular health care provider and then randomly assigned them to read 1 of 3 Twitter posts that varied only in the profile picture of the physician offering health advice. Next, we tasked participants with assessing the credibility of the physician and their likelihood of engaging with the tweet and the physician on Twitter. We used path analysis to assess whether participants having a regular health care provider impacted how the profile picture affected their ratings of the physician's credibility and their likelihood to engage with the tweet and physician on Twitter.

Results: We found that the profile picture of a physician posting health advice in either formal or casual attire did not elicit significant differences in credibility, with ratings comparable to those having no profile image. Among participants assigned the formal appearance condition, those with a regular provider rated the physician higher on a credibility than those without, which led to stronger intentions to engage with the tweet and physician.

Conclusions: The findings add to existing research by showing how the social context of information seeking on social media shapes the credibility of a given professional. Practical implications for professionals engaging with the public on social media and combating false information include moving past debates about casual versus formal appearances and toward identifying ways to segment audiences based on factors like their backgrounds (eg, experiences with health care providers).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

影响医生在Twitter上分享健康信息时可信度的因素:在线实验研究。
背景:关于用户如何评价专业人士作为他们在社交媒体上找到的信息来源的可信度的研究,在很大程度上缺乏调查特定职业(如医生)中影响可信度的因素的工作。目的:我们讨论了医生如何在社交媒体上展示他们的可信度,这取决于他们在个人资料照片中是使用正式的还是随意的外观。使用突出解释理论,我们假设正式的外表会影响基于用户社会背景的感知可信度,特别是他们是否有定期的医疗保健提供者。方法:在本实验中,我们使用Amazon Mechanical Turk招募了205名社交媒体用户。我们询问参与者是否有固定的医疗服务提供者,然后随机分配他们阅读3个Twitter帖子中的1个,这些帖子只有提供健康建议的医生的头像不同。接下来,我们让参与者评估医生的可信度,以及他们在推特上与推特和医生互动的可能性。我们使用路径分析来评估拥有常规医疗服务提供者的参与者是否会影响个人资料图片如何影响他们对医生可信度的评级以及他们在Twitter上与推文和医生互动的可能性。结果:我们发现,无论是穿着正装还是休闲装的医生发布健康建议的头像,其可信度都没有显著差异,其评分与没有头像的医生相当。在指定了正式外表条件的参与者中,那些有固定医疗服务提供者的人对医生的可信度的评价高于那些没有医疗服务提供者的人,这导致他们更愿意与推特和医生互动。结论:这些发现为现有的研究提供了补充,表明了在社交媒体上寻求信息的社会背景如何塑造了特定专业人士的可信度。对于在社交媒体上与公众接触并打击虚假信息的专业人士来说,这一做法的实际意义包括:改变过去关于非正式与正式着装的争论,转而根据背景等因素(例如,与医疗服务提供者的接触经历)确定对受众进行细分的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信