Manual Versus Electric Toothbrush Efficacy in the Primary Dentition: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Using Image Analysis of Digital Photographs.
Marí Lidia Elizondo, Guillermo Martín Rosa, Lorena Dos Santos Antola, Andrea Verónica Galiana
{"title":"Manual Versus Electric Toothbrush Efficacy in the Primary Dentition: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Using Image Analysis of Digital Photographs.","authors":"Marí Lidia Elizondo, Guillermo Martín Rosa, Lorena Dos Santos Antola, Andrea Verónica Galiana","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the efficacy in dental biofilm (DB) removal between electric toothbrushes versus manual toothbrushes in primary dentition using an Image Analysis System (IAS) of digital photographs.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> A prospective, randomized, controlled, blind, crossover clinical trial was conducted for 12 weeks with children between four to six years of age. The amount of DB was evaluated at zero, four, eight and 12 weeks. The degree of acceptance of the type of toothbrush used by the child was assessed at week 12.<br/> <b>Results:</b> Twenty-two children participated and 176 photographs were taken, with 1,408 images of primary incisors being digitally analyzed by IAS. DB was significantly reduced by both types of toothbrushes on day zero (manual=7.44±1.83 percent; electric= 9.80±2.03 percent) and at week four (manual=8.57±2.23 percent; electric= 5.85±2.10 percent). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DB reduction when both types were compared. After week four, when compared prospectively, there was a statistically significant reduction (<i>P</i> <0.05) of DB for the electric toothbrush only. Electric toothbrushes had a significantly greater acceptance by the participants (<i>P</i> <0.01).<br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> Electric toothbrushes eliminated DB better and were more accepted by the children than manual toothbrushes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":"90 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy in dental biofilm (DB) removal between electric toothbrushes versus manual toothbrushes in primary dentition using an Image Analysis System (IAS) of digital photographs. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled, blind, crossover clinical trial was conducted for 12 weeks with children between four to six years of age. The amount of DB was evaluated at zero, four, eight and 12 weeks. The degree of acceptance of the type of toothbrush used by the child was assessed at week 12. Results: Twenty-two children participated and 176 photographs were taken, with 1,408 images of primary incisors being digitally analyzed by IAS. DB was significantly reduced by both types of toothbrushes on day zero (manual=7.44±1.83 percent; electric= 9.80±2.03 percent) and at week four (manual=8.57±2.23 percent; electric= 5.85±2.10 percent). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DB reduction when both types were compared. After week four, when compared prospectively, there was a statistically significant reduction (P <0.05) of DB for the electric toothbrush only. Electric toothbrushes had a significantly greater acceptance by the participants (P <0.01). Conclusion: Electric toothbrushes eliminated DB better and were more accepted by the children than manual toothbrushes.
期刊介绍:
Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.