Where do phosphosites come from and where do they go after gene duplication?

Guillaume Diss, Luca Freschi, Christian R Landry
{"title":"Where do phosphosites come from and where do they go after gene duplication?","authors":"Guillaume Diss,&nbsp;Luca Freschi,&nbsp;Christian R Landry","doi":"10.1155/2012/843167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene duplication followed by divergence is an important mechanism that leads to molecular innovation. Divergence of paralogous genes can be achieved at functional and regulatory levels. Whereas regulatory divergence at the transcriptional level is well documented, little is known about divergence of posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Protein phosphorylation, one of the most important PTMs, has recently been shown to be an important determinant of the retention of paralogous genes. Here we test whether gains and losses of phosphorylated amino acids after gene duplication may specifically modify the regulation of these duplicated proteins. We show that when phosphosites are lost in one paralog, transitions from phosphorylated serines and threonines are significantly biased toward negatively charged amino acids, which can mimic their phosphorylated status in a constitutive manner. Our analyses support the hypothesis that divergence between paralogs can be generated by a loss of the posttranslational regulatory control on a function rather than by the complete loss of the function itself. Surprisingly, these favoured transitions cannot be reached by single mutational steps, which suggests that the function of a phosphosite needs to be completely abolished before it is restored through substitution by these phosphomimetic residues. We conclude by discussing how gene duplication could facilitate the transitions between phosphorylated and phosphomimetic amino acids.</p>","PeriodicalId":73449,"journal":{"name":"International journal of evolutionary biology","volume":"2012 ","pages":"843167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/843167","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of evolutionary biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/843167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Gene duplication followed by divergence is an important mechanism that leads to molecular innovation. Divergence of paralogous genes can be achieved at functional and regulatory levels. Whereas regulatory divergence at the transcriptional level is well documented, little is known about divergence of posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Protein phosphorylation, one of the most important PTMs, has recently been shown to be an important determinant of the retention of paralogous genes. Here we test whether gains and losses of phosphorylated amino acids after gene duplication may specifically modify the regulation of these duplicated proteins. We show that when phosphosites are lost in one paralog, transitions from phosphorylated serines and threonines are significantly biased toward negatively charged amino acids, which can mimic their phosphorylated status in a constitutive manner. Our analyses support the hypothesis that divergence between paralogs can be generated by a loss of the posttranslational regulatory control on a function rather than by the complete loss of the function itself. Surprisingly, these favoured transitions cannot be reached by single mutational steps, which suggests that the function of a phosphosite needs to be completely abolished before it is restored through substitution by these phosphomimetic residues. We conclude by discussing how gene duplication could facilitate the transitions between phosphorylated and phosphomimetic amino acids.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

磷酸体从何而来基因复制后又去了哪里?
基因复制后的分化是导致分子创新的重要机制。同源基因的分化可以在功能和调控水平上实现。尽管转录水平上的调控差异有很好的文献记载,但对翻译后修饰(PTMs)的差异知之甚少。蛋白磷酸化是最重要的ptm之一,最近被证明是旁系基因保留的重要决定因素。在这里,我们测试了基因复制后磷酸化氨基酸的获得和损失是否会特异性地改变这些复制蛋白的调节。我们发现,当磷酸化丝氨酸和苏氨酸在一个平行体中丢失时,从磷酸化丝氨酸和苏氨酸的过渡明显偏向于带负电荷的氨基酸,这可以以一种组成方式模仿它们的磷酸化状态。我们的分析支持这样的假设,即类似物之间的分歧可能是由于对功能的翻译后调控控制的丧失而不是由于功能本身的完全丧失而产生的。令人惊讶的是,这些有利的转变不能通过单一的突变步骤来实现,这表明在通过这些拟磷残基取代来恢复磷酸基的功能之前,磷酸基的功能需要被完全废除。最后,我们讨论了基因复制如何促进磷酸化氨基酸和拟磷氨基酸之间的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信