Evaluating the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Infusion on Labour Pain Management in Primipara Pregnant Women: A Nonrandomised Clinical Trial Study.

Q2 Medicine
Abasali Delavari, Mahdi Dehgan, Marzieh Lak
{"title":"Evaluating the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Infusion on Labour Pain Management in Primipara Pregnant Women: A Nonrandomised Clinical Trial Study.","authors":"Abasali Delavari,&nbsp;Mahdi Dehgan,&nbsp;Marzieh Lak","doi":"10.2478/rjaic-2021-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The pain of labour is very severe. Most women prefer painless labour to routine labour if they are aware of the methods of analgesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion on labour pain management in primipara term pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this nonrandomised clinical trial with control group, all primipara term pregnant women from August 2019 to March 2020 were included. In the intervention group, after the active phase of labour, dexmedetomidine was given according to the protocol and continued until phase 2 of labour. The control group received no intervention to reduce pain. Patients in both groups were evaluated for fetal heart rate, Apgar scores, vital signs, pain intensity, and sedation score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in primary fetal heart rate, primary maternal hemodynamics, and mean Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes between the two groups (p > .05). There was no significant difference in the mean fetal heart rate in different stages between the two groups. Intragroup analysis in the intervention group showed that mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly decreased after drug administration but were in the normal range. The active phase of labour in the intervention group was significantly shorter than in the control group (p = 0.002). The mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after dexmedetomidine administration decreased significantly from 9.25 at baseline to 4.61 after drug administration, 3.88 during labour, and 1.88 after placental expulsion. The mean Ramsay Sedation Scale score after dexmedetomidine administration increased significantly from 1.00 at baseline to 2.05 after drug administration, 2.22 during labour, and 2.05 after placental expulsion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study's results, the administration of dexmedetomidine to manage labour pain with careful monitoring of mother and fetus is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":21279,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","volume":"28 1","pages":"10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/ad/rjaic-28-010.PMC9949007.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2021-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The pain of labour is very severe. Most women prefer painless labour to routine labour if they are aware of the methods of analgesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion on labour pain management in primipara term pregnant women.

Methods: In this nonrandomised clinical trial with control group, all primipara term pregnant women from August 2019 to March 2020 were included. In the intervention group, after the active phase of labour, dexmedetomidine was given according to the protocol and continued until phase 2 of labour. The control group received no intervention to reduce pain. Patients in both groups were evaluated for fetal heart rate, Apgar scores, vital signs, pain intensity, and sedation score.

Results: There were no significant differences in primary fetal heart rate, primary maternal hemodynamics, and mean Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes between the two groups (p > .05). There was no significant difference in the mean fetal heart rate in different stages between the two groups. Intragroup analysis in the intervention group showed that mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly decreased after drug administration but were in the normal range. The active phase of labour in the intervention group was significantly shorter than in the control group (p = 0.002). The mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after dexmedetomidine administration decreased significantly from 9.25 at baseline to 4.61 after drug administration, 3.88 during labour, and 1.88 after placental expulsion. The mean Ramsay Sedation Scale score after dexmedetomidine administration increased significantly from 1.00 at baseline to 2.05 after drug administration, 2.22 during labour, and 2.05 after placental expulsion.

Conclusion: Based on the study's results, the administration of dexmedetomidine to manage labour pain with careful monitoring of mother and fetus is recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评价右美托咪定静脉输注对初产妇分娩疼痛管理的影响:一项非随机临床试验研究。
背景和目的:阵痛非常剧烈。如果知道镇痛方法,大多数妇女宁愿无痛分娩而不愿常规分娩。本研究的目的是评估右美托咪定静脉输注对初产妇分娩疼痛管理的影响。方法:在2019年8月至2020年3月的非随机对照临床试验中,纳入所有初产妇。干预组在产程活跃期后,按照方案给予右美托咪定,并持续至产程2期。对照组患者不接受任何减轻疼痛的干预。评估两组患者的胎儿心率、阿普加评分、生命体征、疼痛强度和镇静评分。结果:两组间1、5分钟初发胎心率、母体血流动力学、平均Apgar评分差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。两组各阶段胎儿平均心率差异无统计学意义。干预组组内分析显示,给药后平均收缩压和舒张压均明显降低,但仍在正常范围内。干预组产程活动期明显短于对照组(p = 0.002)。右美托咪定给药后的平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)从基线时的9.25分显著下降到给药后的4.61分、分娩时的3.88分和胎盘排出后的1.88分。右美托咪定给药后Ramsay镇静量表平均评分从基线时的1.00分显著升高至给药后的2.05分,分娩时的2.22分,排胎盘后的2.05分。结论:根据研究结果,建议在仔细监测母体和胎儿的情况下使用右美托咪定来控制分娩疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is the official journal of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and has been published continuously since 1994. It is intended mainly for anaesthesia and intensive care providers, but it is also aimed at specialists in emergency medical care and in pain research and management. The Journal is indexed in Scopus, Embase, PubMed Central as well as the databases of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (CNCSIS) B+ category. The Journal publishes two issues per year, the first one in April and the second one in October, and contains original articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, book reviews and commentaries. The Journal is distributed free of charge to the members of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信