Assessment of Emergency Medical Services Personnel Compliance with Escalating Airway Algorithm Protocol.

Leah Duncan, Michael Falahat, Connor Hartpence, Deryk S Ruddle, Samuel Ofei-Dodoo
{"title":"Assessment of Emergency Medical Services Personnel Compliance with Escalating Airway Algorithm Protocol.","authors":"Leah Duncan,&nbsp;Michael Falahat,&nbsp;Connor Hartpence,&nbsp;Deryk S Ruddle,&nbsp;Samuel Ofei-Dodoo","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.18938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When emergency medical services (EMS) personnel respond to emergencies, the decisions they make often can mean life or death for the patient. This is especially true in the case of advanced airway management. Protocols are set in place to ensure that the least invasive airway management techniques are used initially before more invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine how often EMS personnel followed this protocol, while adequately achieving the goals of appropriate oxygenation and ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Kansas Medical Center. The authors reviewed the Wichita/Sedgewick County EMS system for cases during 2017 in which patients required airway support. We examined de-identified data to determine if invasive methods were applied in sequence. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and immersion-crystallization approach were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 279 cases were identified in which EMS personnel used advanced airway management techniques. In 90% (n = 251) of cases, less invasive techniques were not used prior to more invasive techniques and in 80% (n = 222) of cases, the more invasive technique was used alone. A dirty airway was the most common reason for the EMS personnel's choice of using more invasive approaches in achieving the goals of appropriate oxygenation and ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data showed that EMS personnel in Sedgwick County/Wichita, Kansas often deviated from the advanced airway management protocols when caring for patients in need of respiratory intervention. Dirty airway was the main reason for using a more invasive approach in achieving the goals of appropriate oxygenation and ventilation. It is important to understand reasons why deviations in protocol were occurring to ensure that current protocols, documentation, and training practices are effective in producing the best possible patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"53-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/c3/16-53.PMC9957594.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.18938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: When emergency medical services (EMS) personnel respond to emergencies, the decisions they make often can mean life or death for the patient. This is especially true in the case of advanced airway management. Protocols are set in place to ensure that the least invasive airway management techniques are used initially before more invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine how often EMS personnel followed this protocol, while adequately achieving the goals of appropriate oxygenation and ventilation.

Methods: This retrospective chart review was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Kansas Medical Center. The authors reviewed the Wichita/Sedgewick County EMS system for cases during 2017 in which patients required airway support. We examined de-identified data to determine if invasive methods were applied in sequence. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and immersion-crystallization approach were used to analyze the data.

Results: A total of 279 cases were identified in which EMS personnel used advanced airway management techniques. In 90% (n = 251) of cases, less invasive techniques were not used prior to more invasive techniques and in 80% (n = 222) of cases, the more invasive technique was used alone. A dirty airway was the most common reason for the EMS personnel's choice of using more invasive approaches in achieving the goals of appropriate oxygenation and ventilation.

Conclusions: Our data showed that EMS personnel in Sedgwick County/Wichita, Kansas often deviated from the advanced airway management protocols when caring for patients in need of respiratory intervention. Dirty airway was the main reason for using a more invasive approach in achieving the goals of appropriate oxygenation and ventilation. It is important to understand reasons why deviations in protocol were occurring to ensure that current protocols, documentation, and training practices are effective in producing the best possible patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

急救医务人员气道升级算法协议依从性评估
简介:当紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员应对紧急情况时,他们所做的决定往往意味着患者的生或死。在先进气道管理的情况下尤其如此。制定了适当的方案,以确保在更有创性的技术之前首先使用侵入性最小的气道管理技术。本研究的目的是确定EMS人员在充分实现适当氧合和通气目标的同时,遵循该方案的频率。方法:本回顾性图表综述经堪萨斯大学医学中心机构审查委员会批准。作者回顾了2017年威奇托/塞奇威克县EMS系统中患者需要气道支持的病例。我们检查了去识别数据,以确定是否按顺序应用了侵入性方法。采用Cohen’s kappa系数(κ)和浸没结晶法对数据进行分析。结果:EMS人员采用先进的气道管理技术,共发现279例。在90% (n = 251)的病例中,侵入性较小的技术没有在侵入性较大的技术之前使用,在80% (n = 222)的病例中,单独使用侵入性较大的技术。肮脏的气道是EMS人员选择使用更有创入路以实现适当氧合和通气目标的最常见原因。结论:我们的数据显示,堪萨斯州塞奇威克县/威奇托的EMS人员在护理需要呼吸干预的患者时经常偏离先进的气道管理方案。气道脏污是采用更有创入路实现适当氧合和通气目标的主要原因。了解方案偏差发生的原因是很重要的,以确保当前的方案、文件和培训实践能够有效地产生最佳的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信