Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Carcinoma Endometrium.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Aparna Mullangath Prakasan, Minolin Dhas, Krishnapillai M Jagathnathkrishna, Aswin Kumar, Susan Mathews, John Joseph, Suchetha Sambasivan, Francis V James
{"title":"Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Carcinoma Endometrium.","authors":"Aparna Mullangath Prakasan,&nbsp;Minolin Dhas,&nbsp;Krishnapillai M Jagathnathkrishna,&nbsp;Aswin Kumar,&nbsp;Susan Mathews,&nbsp;John Joseph,&nbsp;Suchetha Sambasivan,&nbsp;Francis V James","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1735563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Francis. V. James<b>Objective</b>  The study aimed to see the clinical outcome and to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with carcinoma endometrium. <b>Methods</b>  Patients registered at Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, with carcinoma endometrium from January 2009 to December 2013 were identified from hospital registry. Data regarding patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment schedules, and follow-up were collected using a structured proforma. Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model was performed to determine the impact of prognostic factors on outcome. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 11. <b>Results</b>  The median follow-up of the 686 patients was 95 months (range 3-178 months).There were 432 stage 1 (63%), 100 stage II (14.6%), 108 stage III (15.7%), and 46 stage IV patients (6.7%). The 5-year overall survival was 89.2%. Prognostic factors for survival on univariate analysis were age 60 years or older, nonendometrioid histology, high-grade tumor, cervical stromal involvement, para-aortic node involvement, negative progesterone receptor expression, deep myometrial invasion advanced stage, surgery versus no surgery, serosal involvement, and ovarian and fallopian tube involvement. However, on multivariate analysis, age over 60 years, higher histological grade, advanced stage, and deep myometrial and parametrial invasion were associated with significantly poorer survival. <b>Conclusion</b>  We found that age over 60 years at presentation, higher grade, advanced stage, deep myometrial invasion, and parametrial invasion were associated with poorer survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"11 4","pages":"309-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/2d/10-1055-s-0041-1735563.PMC9902095.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Francis. V. JamesObjective  The study aimed to see the clinical outcome and to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with carcinoma endometrium. Methods  Patients registered at Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, with carcinoma endometrium from January 2009 to December 2013 were identified from hospital registry. Data regarding patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment schedules, and follow-up were collected using a structured proforma. Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model was performed to determine the impact of prognostic factors on outcome. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 11. Results  The median follow-up of the 686 patients was 95 months (range 3-178 months).There were 432 stage 1 (63%), 100 stage II (14.6%), 108 stage III (15.7%), and 46 stage IV patients (6.7%). The 5-year overall survival was 89.2%. Prognostic factors for survival on univariate analysis were age 60 years or older, nonendometrioid histology, high-grade tumor, cervical stromal involvement, para-aortic node involvement, negative progesterone receptor expression, deep myometrial invasion advanced stage, surgery versus no surgery, serosal involvement, and ovarian and fallopian tube involvement. However, on multivariate analysis, age over 60 years, higher histological grade, advanced stage, and deep myometrial and parametrial invasion were associated with significantly poorer survival. Conclusion  We found that age over 60 years at presentation, higher grade, advanced stage, deep myometrial invasion, and parametrial invasion were associated with poorer survival.

Abstract Image

影响子宫内膜癌患者生存的预后因素。
弗朗西斯。目的本研究旨在观察子宫内膜癌患者的临床结局,并确定影响患者生存的预后因素。方法选取2009年1月至2013年12月在印度喀拉拉邦蒂鲁凡南得普兰地区癌症中心登记的子宫内膜癌患者。使用结构化形式表收集有关患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗计划和随访的数据。生存估计使用Kaplan-Meier法生成。单变量分析采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。采用Cox回归模型进行多因素分析,以确定预后因素对预后的影响。采用SPSS软件11版进行统计分析。结果686例患者中位随访时间为95个月(3 ~ 178个月)。1期432例(63%),II期100例(14.6%),III期108例(15.7%),IV期46例(6.7%)。5年总生存率为89.2%。单因素分析的预后因素为年龄60岁及以上、非子宫内膜样组织学、高级别肿瘤、宫颈间质受累、主动脉旁淋巴结受累、孕激素受体阴性表达、深部肌层浸润晚期、手术与未手术、浆膜受累、卵巢和输卵管受累。然而,在多变量分析中,年龄超过60岁、较高的组织学分级、晚期、深部肌层及参数性侵与生存率明显较低相关。结论我们发现,发病年龄超过60岁、分级较高、晚期、深部肌层浸润和参数性浸润与较差的生存率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信