Total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe obesity: outcomes of standard keeled tibial components versus stemmed universal base plates.

IF 4.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Katherine L Elcock, Deborah J MacDonald, Nick D Clement, Chloe E H Scott
{"title":"Total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe obesity: outcomes of standard keeled tibial components versus stemmed universal base plates.","authors":"Katherine L Elcock,&nbsp;Deborah J MacDonald,&nbsp;Nick D Clement,&nbsp;Chloe E H Scott","doi":"10.1186/s43019-023-00184-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] potentially overload the tibial component after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), risking tibial subsidence. Using a cemented single-radius cruciate-retaining TKA design, this study compared the outcomes of two tibial baseplate geometries in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: standard keeled (SK) or universal base plate (UBP), which incorporates a stem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study with minimum 2 years follow-up of 111 TKA patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: mean age 62.2 ± 8.0 (44-87) years, mean BMI 44.3 ± 4.6 (40-65.7) kg/m<sup>2</sup> and 82 (73.9%) females. Perioperative complications, reoperations, alignment and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS): EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and satisfaction were collected preoperatively, and at 1 year and final follow-up postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow-up was 4.9 years. SK tibial baseplates were performed in 57 and UBP in 54. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics, post-operative alignment, post-operative PROMs, reoperations or revisions between the groups. Three early failures requiring revision occurred: two septic failures in the UBP group and one early tibial loosening in the SK group. Five-year Kaplan-Meier survival for the endpoint mechanical tibial failure was SK 98.1 [94.4-100 95% confidence interval (CI)] and UBP 100% (p = 0.391). Overall varus alignment of the limb (p = 0.005) or the tibial component (p = 0.031) was significantly associated with revision and return to theatre.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At early to mid-term follow-up, no significant differences in outcomes were found between standard and UBP tibial components in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Varus alignment of either tibial component or the limb was associated with revision and return to theatre.</p>","PeriodicalId":17886,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088243/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-023-00184-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2] potentially overload the tibial component after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), risking tibial subsidence. Using a cemented single-radius cruciate-retaining TKA design, this study compared the outcomes of two tibial baseplate geometries in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2: standard keeled (SK) or universal base plate (UBP), which incorporates a stem.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study with minimum 2 years follow-up of 111 TKA patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2: mean age 62.2 ± 8.0 (44-87) years, mean BMI 44.3 ± 4.6 (40-65.7) kg/m2 and 82 (73.9%) females. Perioperative complications, reoperations, alignment and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS): EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and satisfaction were collected preoperatively, and at 1 year and final follow-up postoperatively.

Results: Mean follow-up was 4.9 years. SK tibial baseplates were performed in 57 and UBP in 54. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics, post-operative alignment, post-operative PROMs, reoperations or revisions between the groups. Three early failures requiring revision occurred: two septic failures in the UBP group and one early tibial loosening in the SK group. Five-year Kaplan-Meier survival for the endpoint mechanical tibial failure was SK 98.1 [94.4-100 95% confidence interval (CI)] and UBP 100% (p = 0.391). Overall varus alignment of the limb (p = 0.005) or the tibial component (p = 0.031) was significantly associated with revision and return to theatre.

Conclusions: At early to mid-term follow-up, no significant differences in outcomes were found between standard and UBP tibial components in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Varus alignment of either tibial component or the limb was associated with revision and return to theatre.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重度肥胖患者的全膝关节置换术:标准龙骨胫骨组件与有柄通用基板的结果。
背景:重度肥胖患者[体重指数(BMI)≥40 kg/m2]在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后可能会使胫骨部件过载,有胫骨下沉的风险。本研究采用骨水泥单桡骨固定TKA设计,比较了BMI≥40 kg/m2患者的两种胫骨基板几何形状的结果:标准龙骨(SK)或通用基板(UBP),其中包含一个柄。方法:对111例体重指数≥40 kg/m2的TKA患者进行回顾性、单中心队列研究,随访至少2年,平均年龄62.2±8.0(44-87)岁,平均体重指数44.3±4.6 (40-65.7)kg/m2,女性82例(73.9%)。收集围手术期并发症、再手术、对齐和患者报告结果(PROMS): EQ-5D、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和满意度,并于术前、术后1年和最后随访时进行统计。结果:平均随访时间为4.9年。57例行SK胫骨基板,54例行UBP胫骨基板。两组之间的基线患者特征、术后对齐、术后prom、再手术或翻修均无显著差异。发生了3例需要翻修的早期失败:UBP组2例败血症失败,SK组1例早期胫骨松动。终点机械胫骨衰竭的5年Kaplan-Meier生存率为SK 98.1[95%可信区间(CI) 94.4-100], UBP为100% (p = 0.391)。肢体整体内翻对齐(p = 0.005)或胫骨部分(p = 0.031)与翻修和重返手术室显著相关。结论:在BMI≥40 kg/m2患者的早期至中期随访中,标准胫骨组件与UBP胫骨组件的结局无显著差异。胫骨或肢体的内翻对准与翻修和返回剧院有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信