Understanding Health Care Administrators' Data and Information Needs for Decision Making during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study at an Academic Health System.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christina Guerrier, Cara McDonnell, Tanja Magoc, Jennifer N Fishe, Christopher A Harle
{"title":"Understanding Health Care Administrators' Data and Information Needs for Decision Making during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study at an Academic Health System.","authors":"Christina Guerrier,&nbsp;Cara McDonnell,&nbsp;Tanja Magoc,&nbsp;Jennifer N Fishe,&nbsp;Christopher A Harle","doi":"10.1177/23814683221089844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective.</b> The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented strain on the health care system, and administrators had to make many critical decisions to respond appropriately. This study sought to understand how health care administrators used data and information for decision making during the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Materials and Methods.</b> We conducted semistructured interviews with administrators across University of Florida (UF) Health. We performed an inductive thematic analysis of the transcripts. <b>Results.</b> Four themes emerged from the interviews: 1) common types of health systems or hospital operations data; 2) public health and other external data sources; 3) data interaction, integration, and exchange; and 4) novelty and evolution in data, information, or tools used over time. Participants illustrated the organizational, public health, and regional information they considered essential (e.g., hospital census, community positivity rate, etc.). Participants named specific challenges they faced due to data quality and timeliness. Participants elaborated on the necessity of data integration, validation, and coordination across different boundaries (e.g., different hospital systems in the same metro areas, public health agencies at the local, state, and federal level, etc.). Participants indicated that even within the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic, the data and tools used for making critical decisions changed. <b>Discussion.</b> While existing medical informatics infrastructure can facilitate decision making in pandemic response, data may not always be readily available in a usable format. Interoperable infrastructure and data standardization across multiple health systems would help provide more reliable and timely information for decision making. <b>Conclusion.</b> Our findings contribute to future discussions of improving data infrastructure and developing harmonized data standards needed to facilitate critical decisions at multiple health care system levels.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The study revealed common health systems or hospital operations data and information used in decision making during the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic.Participants described commonly used internal data sources, such as resource and financial reports and dashboards, and external data sources, such as federal, state, and local public health data.Participants described challenges including poor timeliness and limited local relevance of external data as well as poor integration of data sources within and across organizational boundaries.Results suggest the need for continued integration and standardization of health data to support health care administrative decision making during pandemics or other emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"23814683221089844"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/f3/10.1177_23814683221089844.PMC8972941.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221089844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective. The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented strain on the health care system, and administrators had to make many critical decisions to respond appropriately. This study sought to understand how health care administrators used data and information for decision making during the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods. We conducted semistructured interviews with administrators across University of Florida (UF) Health. We performed an inductive thematic analysis of the transcripts. Results. Four themes emerged from the interviews: 1) common types of health systems or hospital operations data; 2) public health and other external data sources; 3) data interaction, integration, and exchange; and 4) novelty and evolution in data, information, or tools used over time. Participants illustrated the organizational, public health, and regional information they considered essential (e.g., hospital census, community positivity rate, etc.). Participants named specific challenges they faced due to data quality and timeliness. Participants elaborated on the necessity of data integration, validation, and coordination across different boundaries (e.g., different hospital systems in the same metro areas, public health agencies at the local, state, and federal level, etc.). Participants indicated that even within the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic, the data and tools used for making critical decisions changed. Discussion. While existing medical informatics infrastructure can facilitate decision making in pandemic response, data may not always be readily available in a usable format. Interoperable infrastructure and data standardization across multiple health systems would help provide more reliable and timely information for decision making. Conclusion. Our findings contribute to future discussions of improving data infrastructure and developing harmonized data standards needed to facilitate critical decisions at multiple health care system levels.

Highlights: The study revealed common health systems or hospital operations data and information used in decision making during the first 6 mo of the COVID-19 pandemic.Participants described commonly used internal data sources, such as resource and financial reports and dashboards, and external data sources, such as federal, state, and local public health data.Participants described challenges including poor timeliness and limited local relevance of external data as well as poor integration of data sources within and across organizational boundaries.Results suggest the need for continued integration and standardization of health data to support health care administrative decision making during pandemics or other emergencies.

Abstract Image

了解COVID-19大流行期间卫生保健管理人员决策的数据和信息需求:一项学术卫生系统的定性研究
目标。2019冠状病毒病大流行给医疗保健系统造成了前所未有的压力,管理人员不得不做出许多关键决定以作出适当的反应。本研究旨在了解在COVID-19大流行的前6个月,卫生保健管理人员如何使用数据和信息进行决策。材料与方法。我们对佛罗里达大学(UF)健康中心的管理人员进行了半结构化访谈。我们对抄本进行了归纳性专题分析。结果。访谈中出现了四个主题:1)常见类型的卫生系统或医院运营数据;2)公共卫生和其他外部数据来源;3)数据交互、集成、交换;4)随着时间的推移,数据、信息或工具的新颖性和进化性。与会者说明了他们认为必不可少的组织、公共卫生和区域信息(例如,医院普查、社区阳性率等)。与会者列举了他们在数据质量和及时性方面面临的具体挑战。与会者详细阐述了数据集成、验证和跨边界协调的必要性(例如,同一都市区的不同医院系统,地方、州和联邦一级的公共卫生机构等)。与会者表示,即使在2019冠状病毒病大流行的头6个月内,用于做出关键决策的数据和工具也发生了变化。讨论。虽然现有的医疗信息基础设施可以促进大流行应对方面的决策,但数据可能并不总是以可用的格式随时可用。跨多个卫生系统的可互操作基础设施和数据标准化将有助于为决策提供更可靠和及时的信息。结论。我们的研究结果有助于未来讨论改善数据基础设施和制定协调的数据标准,以促进多个卫生保健系统级别的关键决策。重点:该研究揭示了在COVID-19大流行的前6个月期间用于决策的常见卫生系统或医院业务数据和信息。与会者描述了常用的内部数据源,如资源和财务报告及仪表板,以及外部数据源,如联邦、州和地方公共卫生数据。与会者描述了各种挑战,包括外部数据的时效性差、本地相关性有限,以及组织边界内和跨组织边界的数据源整合不佳。结果表明,需要继续整合和标准化卫生数据,以支持大流行或其他突发事件期间的卫生保健行政决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信