From Revolutionary to Stakeholder: Looking at Identity Discourses to Understand the 2016 Short-term Change in China's North Korea Policy.

IF 4.6 1区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Nicholas Olczak
{"title":"From Revolutionary to Stakeholder: Looking at Identity Discourses to Understand the 2016 Short-term Change in China's North Korea Policy.","authors":"Nicholas Olczak","doi":"10.1007/s11366-023-09847-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During 2016 China's policies towards North Korea appeared to undergo considerable short-term change, increasingly distancing itself from its neighbour and instead supporting the international community's response. Existing research has focused on long-term policy change and given little importance to short-term changes in policy, or has drawn on realist and constructivist theories which expect consistency and struggle to account for these changes. This article took an identity discourse approach to understanding the 2016 short-term changes in China's North Korea policy. It used quantitative computer assisted text analysis methods to measure changes in the dominance of different identity discourses related to North Korea that are produced on the Chinese Internet. It found that around 2015-2016, a previously more dominant \"revolutionary\" identity discourse lost dominance to a \"stakeholder\" identity discourse. The article argues that this change made possible the shift in approach to North Korea at the start of 2016 and indicates ways the short-term policy changes at this time may contribute to longer-term change in China's behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":46205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Political Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09847-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During 2016 China's policies towards North Korea appeared to undergo considerable short-term change, increasingly distancing itself from its neighbour and instead supporting the international community's response. Existing research has focused on long-term policy change and given little importance to short-term changes in policy, or has drawn on realist and constructivist theories which expect consistency and struggle to account for these changes. This article took an identity discourse approach to understanding the 2016 short-term changes in China's North Korea policy. It used quantitative computer assisted text analysis methods to measure changes in the dominance of different identity discourses related to North Korea that are produced on the Chinese Internet. It found that around 2015-2016, a previously more dominant "revolutionary" identity discourse lost dominance to a "stakeholder" identity discourse. The article argues that this change made possible the shift in approach to North Korea at the start of 2016 and indicates ways the short-term policy changes at this time may contribute to longer-term change in China's behaviour.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从革命者到利益相关者:从身份论述看 2016 年中国朝鲜政策的短期变化》。
2016 年期间,中国的朝鲜政策似乎发生了相当大的短期变化,与邻国的关系日益疏远,转而支持国际社会的反应。现有研究侧重于长期政策变化,对政策的短期变化不甚重视,或者借鉴现实主义和建构主义理论,这些理论期望政策的一致性,但难以解释这些变化。本文采用认同话语方法来理解 2016 年中国朝鲜政策的短期变化。文章采用定量计算机辅助文本分析方法,衡量了中国互联网上产生的与朝鲜有关的不同身份话语的主导地位的变化。研究发现,在 2015-2016 年前后,以前更占主导地位的 "革命 "身份话语失去了 "利益相关者 "身份话语的主导地位。文章认为,这一变化使得 2016 年初对朝鲜的态度发生转变成为可能,并指出此时的短期政策变化可能会促进中国行为的长期变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
27.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Journal of Chinese Political Science (JCPS) is a refereed academic journal that publishes theoretical, policy, and empirical research articles on Chinese politics across the whole spectrum of political science, with emphasis on Chinese domestic politics and foreign policy in comparative perspectives. However, JCPS also welcomes manuscripts on different aspects of contemporary China when these relate closely to Chinese politics, political economy, political culture, reform and opening, development, the military, law and legal system, foreign relations, and other important issues of political significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信