State and Federal Legislators' Responses on Social Media to the Mental Health and Burnout of Health Care Workers Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: Natural Language Processing and Sentiment Analysis.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2196/38676
Matthew P Abrams, Arthur P Pelullo, Zachary F Meisel, Raina M Merchant, Jonathan Purtle, Anish K Agarwal
{"title":"State and Federal Legislators' Responses on Social Media to the Mental Health and Burnout of Health Care Workers Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: Natural Language Processing and Sentiment Analysis.","authors":"Matthew P Abrams,&nbsp;Arthur P Pelullo,&nbsp;Zachary F Meisel,&nbsp;Raina M Merchant,&nbsp;Jonathan Purtle,&nbsp;Anish K Agarwal","doi":"10.2196/38676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout and the mental health burden of the COVID-19 pandemic have disproportionately impacted health care workers. The links between state policies, federal regulations, COVID-19 case counts, strains on health care systems, and the mental health of health care workers continue to evolve. The language used by state and federal legislators in public-facing venues such as social media is important, as it impacts public opinion and behavior, and it also reflects current policy-leader opinions and planned legislation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine legislators' social media content on Twitter and Facebook throughout the COVID-19 pandemic to thematically characterize policy makers' attitudes and perspectives related to mental health and burnout in the health care workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Legislators' social media posts about mental health and burnout in the health care workforce were collected from January 2020 to November 2021 using Quorum, a digital database of policy-related documents. The total number of relevant social media posts per state legislator per calendar month was calculated and compared with COVID-19 case volume. Differences between themes expressed in Democratic and Republican posts were estimated using the Pearson chi-square test. Words within social media posts most associated with each political party were determined. Machine-learning was used to evaluate naturally occurring themes in the burnout- and mental health-related social media posts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4165 social media posts (1400 tweets and 2765 Facebook posts) were generated by 2047 unique state and federal legislators and 38 government entities. The majority of posts (n=2319, 55.68%) were generated by Democrats, followed by Republicans (n=1600, 40.34%). Among both parties, the volume of burnout-related posts was greatest during the initial COVID-19 surge. However, there was significant variation in the themes expressed by the 2 major political parties. Themes most correlated with Democratic posts were (1) frontline care and burnout, (2) vaccines, (3) COVID-19 outbreaks, and (4) mental health services. Themes most correlated with Republican social media posts were (1) legislation, (2) call for local action, (3) government support, and (4) health care worker testing and mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State and federal legislators use social media to share opinions and thoughts on key topics, including burnout and mental health strain among health care workers. Variations in the volume of posts indicated that a focus on burnout and the mental health of the health care workforce existed early in the pandemic but has waned. Significant differences emerged in the content posted by the 2 major US political parties, underscoring how each prioritized different aspects of the crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout and the mental health burden of the COVID-19 pandemic have disproportionately impacted health care workers. The links between state policies, federal regulations, COVID-19 case counts, strains on health care systems, and the mental health of health care workers continue to evolve. The language used by state and federal legislators in public-facing venues such as social media is important, as it impacts public opinion and behavior, and it also reflects current policy-leader opinions and planned legislation.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine legislators' social media content on Twitter and Facebook throughout the COVID-19 pandemic to thematically characterize policy makers' attitudes and perspectives related to mental health and burnout in the health care workforce.

Methods: Legislators' social media posts about mental health and burnout in the health care workforce were collected from January 2020 to November 2021 using Quorum, a digital database of policy-related documents. The total number of relevant social media posts per state legislator per calendar month was calculated and compared with COVID-19 case volume. Differences between themes expressed in Democratic and Republican posts were estimated using the Pearson chi-square test. Words within social media posts most associated with each political party were determined. Machine-learning was used to evaluate naturally occurring themes in the burnout- and mental health-related social media posts.

Results: A total of 4165 social media posts (1400 tweets and 2765 Facebook posts) were generated by 2047 unique state and federal legislators and 38 government entities. The majority of posts (n=2319, 55.68%) were generated by Democrats, followed by Republicans (n=1600, 40.34%). Among both parties, the volume of burnout-related posts was greatest during the initial COVID-19 surge. However, there was significant variation in the themes expressed by the 2 major political parties. Themes most correlated with Democratic posts were (1) frontline care and burnout, (2) vaccines, (3) COVID-19 outbreaks, and (4) mental health services. Themes most correlated with Republican social media posts were (1) legislation, (2) call for local action, (3) government support, and (4) health care worker testing and mental health.

Conclusions: State and federal legislators use social media to share opinions and thoughts on key topics, including burnout and mental health strain among health care workers. Variations in the volume of posts indicated that a focus on burnout and the mental health of the health care workforce existed early in the pandemic but has waned. Significant differences emerged in the content posted by the 2 major US political parties, underscoring how each prioritized different aspects of the crisis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

州和联邦立法者在社交媒体上对COVID-19大流行期间医护人员心理健康和职业倦怠的回应:自然语言处理和情感分析。
背景:COVID-19大流行造成的职业倦怠和精神健康负担对卫生保健工作者的影响不成比例。州政策、联邦法规、COVID-19病例数、卫生保健系统压力以及卫生保健工作者心理健康之间的联系继续演变。州和联邦立法者在社交媒体等面向公众的场所使用的语言很重要,因为它影响公众舆论和行为,也反映了当前政策领导人的意见和计划立法。目的:本研究的目的是研究立法者在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在Twitter和Facebook上的社交媒体内容,以主题方式表征政策制定者对卫生保健人员心理健康和职业倦怠的态度和观点。方法:使用Quorum(一个政策相关文件的数字数据库)收集2020年1月至2021年11月立法者关于卫生保健人员心理健康和职业倦怠的社交媒体帖子。计算每个州议员每个日历月的相关社交媒体帖子总数,并将其与COVID-19病例数进行比较。民主党和共和党帖子中表达的主题之间的差异使用Pearson卡方检验进行估计。研究人员确定了社交媒体帖子中与每个政党最相关的词汇。机器学习被用来评估与倦怠和心理健康有关的社交媒体帖子中自然发生的主题。结果:共有4165条社交媒体帖子(1400条tweet和2765条Facebook帖子)由2047位独特的州和联邦立法者以及38个政府实体生成。大多数帖子(n=2319, 55.68%)来自民主党,其次是共和党(n=1600, 40.34%)。在两党中,与倦怠相关的帖子数量在COVID-19最初激增期间最多。然而,两大政党所表达的主题有很大差异。与民主党职位最相关的主题是(1)一线护理和倦怠,(2)疫苗,(3)COVID-19疫情,(4)心理健康服务。与共和党社交媒体帖子最相关的主题是(1)立法,(2)呼吁地方行动,(3)政府支持,(4)卫生保健工作者检测和心理健康。结论:州和联邦立法者利用社交媒体分享对关键话题的看法和想法,包括卫生保健工作者的倦怠和精神健康压力。员额数量的变化表明,在大流行早期就存在对卫生保健工作人员的倦怠和心理健康的关注,但现在已经减弱。美国两大主要政党发布的内容出现了显著差异,突显出各自对危机的不同优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信