Perceptions of diabetes management among adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: development and validation of the Japanese version of the diabetes family responsibility questionnaire.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hiro Matsumoto, Kaori Nio, Tomoyuki Kawamura, Yoko Obayashi, Yuko Hotta, Yoshihiko Yuyama, Naoko Nishikawa
{"title":"Perceptions of diabetes management among adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: development and validation of the Japanese version of the diabetes family responsibility questionnaire.","authors":"Hiro Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kaori Nio,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Kawamura,&nbsp;Yoko Obayashi,&nbsp;Yuko Hotta,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Yuyama,&nbsp;Naoko Nishikawa","doi":"10.1007/s13340-022-00609-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shift in diabetes management responsibility is critical for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Currently, in Japan, there is insufficient progress in the development of scales for evaluating diabetes management responsibility. We developed the Japanese version of the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ), a scale to evaluate diabetes management responsibility, and verified its reliability and validity. We recruited 12-18-year-old adolescents with T1D and their caregivers. The DFRQ questionnaires (DFRQ-A for adolescents and DFRQ-C for caregivers) were distributed. The responses of 31 pairs were analyzed (adolescents: 9 males, 22 females; mean age: 14.8 ± 1.5 years). The median total DFRQ scores of adolescents (30.0) and caregivers (32.0) were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.269). The internal consistencies (Cronbach's α) were 0.784 and 0.687 for DFRQ-A and DFRQ-C, respectively. DFRQ-A scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak statistically significant negative correlation (<i>r</i> =  - 0.397, <i>p</i> = 0.027), whereas DFRQ-C scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak negative correlation not statistically significant (<i>r</i> =  - 0.311, <i>p</i> = 0.089). Both scores were significantly negatively correlated with self-efficacy for diabetes self-management scores (<i>r</i> =  - 0.390, <i>p</i> = 0.030; <i>r</i> =  - 0.478, p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, a significantly moderate positive correlation was found between these scores (<i>r</i> = 0.624, <i>p</i> < 0.001). We confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of DFRQ. DFRQ is expected to be used as a dyadic scale to evaluate the status of diabetes management responsibility and its transition during adolescence in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"14 2","pages":"155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734505/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00609-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The shift in diabetes management responsibility is critical for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Currently, in Japan, there is insufficient progress in the development of scales for evaluating diabetes management responsibility. We developed the Japanese version of the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ), a scale to evaluate diabetes management responsibility, and verified its reliability and validity. We recruited 12-18-year-old adolescents with T1D and their caregivers. The DFRQ questionnaires (DFRQ-A for adolescents and DFRQ-C for caregivers) were distributed. The responses of 31 pairs were analyzed (adolescents: 9 males, 22 females; mean age: 14.8 ± 1.5 years). The median total DFRQ scores of adolescents (30.0) and caregivers (32.0) were not significantly different (p = 0.269). The internal consistencies (Cronbach's α) were 0.784 and 0.687 for DFRQ-A and DFRQ-C, respectively. DFRQ-A scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak statistically significant negative correlation (r =  - 0.397, p = 0.027), whereas DFRQ-C scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak negative correlation not statistically significant (r =  - 0.311, p = 0.089). Both scores were significantly negatively correlated with self-efficacy for diabetes self-management scores (r =  - 0.390, p = 0.030; r =  - 0.478, p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, a significantly moderate positive correlation was found between these scores (r = 0.624, p < 0.001). We confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of DFRQ. DFRQ is expected to be used as a dyadic scale to evaluate the status of diabetes management responsibility and its transition during adolescence in Japan.

Abstract Image

青少年1型糖尿病患者及其照顾者对糖尿病管理的认知:日本版糖尿病家庭责任问卷的开发和验证
糖尿病管理责任的转变对1型糖尿病青少年(T1D)至关重要。目前,日本在制定糖尿病管理责任评估量表方面进展不足。我们编制了日本版糖尿病家庭责任问卷(DFRQ),用于评估糖尿病管理责任,并对其信度和效度进行了验证。我们招募了12-18岁患有T1D的青少年和他们的照顾者。发放DFRQ问卷(青少年DFRQ- a和照顾者DFRQ- c)。对31对(青少年:男9对,女22对;平均年龄:14.8±1.5岁)。青少年(30.0)和照顾者(32.0)的DFRQ总分中位数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.269)。DFRQ-A和DFRQ-C的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α)分别为0.784和0.687。DFRQ-A得分与青少年年龄呈弱负相关(r = - 0.397, p = 0.027), DFRQ-C得分与青少年年龄呈弱负相关(r = - 0.311, p = 0.089),无统计学意义。两项得分均与糖尿病自我管理得分的自我效能感呈显著负相关(r = - 0.390, p = 0.030;R = - 0.478, p = 0.006)。此外,这些分数之间存在显著的中度正相关(r = 0.624, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology International
Diabetology International ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信