William R McBride, Caroline E Conlan, Nicole A Barylski, Amelie C Warneryd, Randel L Swanson
{"title":"Blood Biomarkers in Brain Injury Medicine.","authors":"William R McBride, Caroline E Conlan, Nicole A Barylski, Amelie C Warneryd, Randel L Swanson","doi":"10.1007/s40141-022-00343-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review seeks to explore blood-based biomarkers with the potential for clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging non-proteomic biomarkers hold promise for more accurate diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, especially in the subacute to chronic phase of TBI recovery. Further, there is a growing understanding of the overlap between TBI-related and Dementia-related blood biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Given the significant heterogeneity inherent in the clinical diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), there has been an exponential increase in TBI-related biomarker research over the past two decades. While TBI-related biomarker assessments include both cerebrospinal fluid analysis and advanced neuroimaging modalities, blood-based biomarkers hold the most promise to be non-invasive biomarkers widely available to Brain Injury Medicine clinicians in diverse practice settings. In this article, we review the most relevant blood biomarkers for the field of Brain Injury Medicine, including both proteomic and non-proteomic blood biomarkers, biomarkers of cerebral microvascular injury, and biomarkers that overlap between TBI and Dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36406,"journal":{"name":"Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports","volume":"2022 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9009302/pdf/nihms-1788893.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-022-00343-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review seeks to explore blood-based biomarkers with the potential for clinical implementation.
Recent findings: Emerging non-proteomic biomarkers hold promise for more accurate diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, especially in the subacute to chronic phase of TBI recovery. Further, there is a growing understanding of the overlap between TBI-related and Dementia-related blood biomarkers.
Summary: Given the significant heterogeneity inherent in the clinical diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), there has been an exponential increase in TBI-related biomarker research over the past two decades. While TBI-related biomarker assessments include both cerebrospinal fluid analysis and advanced neuroimaging modalities, blood-based biomarkers hold the most promise to be non-invasive biomarkers widely available to Brain Injury Medicine clinicians in diverse practice settings. In this article, we review the most relevant blood biomarkers for the field of Brain Injury Medicine, including both proteomic and non-proteomic blood biomarkers, biomarkers of cerebral microvascular injury, and biomarkers that overlap between TBI and Dementia.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to offer expert review articles on the most significant recent developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions, the journal serves those for whom an understanding of emerging knowledge in the rehabilitation sciences is essential to optimizing health, function, and participation in individuals with physical disabilities. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An Editorial Board of more than 20 internationally diverse members reviews the annual table of contents, ensures that topics include emerging research, and suggests topics of special importance to their country/region. Topics covered may include amputee rehabilitation; interventional pain management; musculoskeletal rehabilitation; pediatric rehabilitation; spinal cord injury rehabilitation; stroke rehabilitation; swallowing disorders; and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.