Dual-source strength seed loading for eye plaque brachytherapy using eye physics eye plaques: A feasibility study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Sheridan G Meltsner, David G Kirsch, Miguel A Materin, Yongbok Kim, Yang Sheng, Oana Craciunescu
{"title":"Dual-source strength seed loading for eye plaque brachytherapy using eye physics eye plaques: A feasibility study.","authors":"Sheridan G Meltsner,&nbsp;David G Kirsch,&nbsp;Miguel A Materin,&nbsp;Yongbok Kim,&nbsp;Yang Sheng,&nbsp;Oana Craciunescu","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2022.123979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study quantifies the dosimetric impact of incorporating two iodine-125 (<sup>125</sup>I) seed source strengths in Eye Physics eye plaques for treatment of uveal melanoma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Plaque Simulator was used to retrospectively plan 15 clinical cases of three types: (1) Shallow tumors (< 5.5 mm) with large base dimensions (range, 16-19 mm); (2) Tumors near the optic nerve planned with notched plaques; and (3) Very shallow (< 3.0 mm) tumors with moderate base dimensions (range, 13.5-15.5 mm) planned with larger plaques than requested by the ocular oncologist. Circular plaques were planned with outer ring sources twice the source strength of inner sources, and notched plaques with the six seeds closest to the notch at twice the source strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases of type (1), the dual-source strength plan decreased prescription depth, and doses to critical structures were lower: inner sclera -25% ±2%, optic disc -7% ±3%, and fovea -6% ±3%. In four out of five cases of type (2), the dual-source strength plan decreased prescription depth, and dose to inner sclera was lower (-22% ±5%), while dose to optic disc (17% ±7%) and fovea (20% ±12%) increased. In cases of type (3), a smaller dual-source strength plaque was used, and scleral dose was lower (-45% ±3%), whereas dose to optic disc (1% ±14%) and fovea (5% ±5%) increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual-source strength loading as described in this study can be used to cover tumor margins and decrease dose to sclera, and therefore the adjacent retina, but can either decrease or increase radiation dose to optic disc and fovea depending on location and size of the tumor. This technique may allow the use of a smaller plaque, if requested by the ocular oncologist. Clinical determination to use this technique should be performed on an individual basis, and additional QA steps are required. Integrating the use of volumetric imaging may be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/0a/JCB-14-49849.PMC9924146.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study quantifies the dosimetric impact of incorporating two iodine-125 (125I) seed source strengths in Eye Physics eye plaques for treatment of uveal melanoma.

Material and methods: Plaque Simulator was used to retrospectively plan 15 clinical cases of three types: (1) Shallow tumors (< 5.5 mm) with large base dimensions (range, 16-19 mm); (2) Tumors near the optic nerve planned with notched plaques; and (3) Very shallow (< 3.0 mm) tumors with moderate base dimensions (range, 13.5-15.5 mm) planned with larger plaques than requested by the ocular oncologist. Circular plaques were planned with outer ring sources twice the source strength of inner sources, and notched plaques with the six seeds closest to the notch at twice the source strength.

Results: In cases of type (1), the dual-source strength plan decreased prescription depth, and doses to critical structures were lower: inner sclera -25% ±2%, optic disc -7% ±3%, and fovea -6% ±3%. In four out of five cases of type (2), the dual-source strength plan decreased prescription depth, and dose to inner sclera was lower (-22% ±5%), while dose to optic disc (17% ±7%) and fovea (20% ±12%) increased. In cases of type (3), a smaller dual-source strength plaque was used, and scleral dose was lower (-45% ±3%), whereas dose to optic disc (1% ±14%) and fovea (5% ±5%) increased.

Conclusions: Dual-source strength loading as described in this study can be used to cover tumor margins and decrease dose to sclera, and therefore the adjacent retina, but can either decrease or increase radiation dose to optic disc and fovea depending on location and size of the tumor. This technique may allow the use of a smaller plaque, if requested by the ocular oncologist. Clinical determination to use this technique should be performed on an individual basis, and additional QA steps are required. Integrating the use of volumetric imaging may be warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

双源强度种子负荷用于眼物理眼斑近距离治疗的可行性研究。
目的:本研究量化了两种碘-125 (125I)种子源强度在眼物理眼斑中治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的剂量学影响。材料与方法:采用斑块模拟器对15例临床病例进行回顾性规划,分为三类:(1)基底尺寸较大(范围16 ~ 19 mm)的浅部肿瘤(< 5.5 mm);(2)视神经附近肿瘤伴切口斑块;(3)非常浅(< 3.0 mm)的肿瘤,其基础尺寸适中(范围13.5-15.5 mm),计划的斑块比眼科肿瘤学家要求的要大。用两倍于内源强度的外环源来规划圆形斑块,用两倍于内源强度的最靠近缺口的6颗种子来规划缺口斑块。结果:在(1)型病例中,双源强度计划降低了处方深度,对关键结构的剂量较低:巩膜内-25%±2%,视盘-7%±3%,中央窝-6%±3%。(2)型5例中有4例双源强度方案降低处方深度,巩膜内剂量较低(-22%±5%),视盘剂量增加(17%±7%),中央窝剂量增加(20%±12%)。在(3)型病例中,使用较小的双源强度斑块,巩膜剂量较低(-45%±3%),而视盘剂量(1%±14%)和中央凹剂量(5%±5%)增加。结论:本研究中描述的双源强度负荷可用于覆盖肿瘤边缘,减少巩膜和邻近视网膜的辐射剂量,但可根据肿瘤的位置和大小减少或增加视盘和中央窝的辐射剂量。如果眼科肿瘤学家要求,这种技术可以使用更小的斑块。使用该技术的临床决定应在个体基础上进行,并需要额外的QA步骤。整合使用体积成像可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信