Validity and reproducibility of food photographic estimation for evaluating meals in evacuation shelters.

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Haruka Kobayashi, Noriko Sudo, Nobuyo Tsuboyama-Kasaoka, Ikuko Shimada, Keiichi Sato
{"title":"Validity and reproducibility of food photographic estimation for evaluating meals in evacuation shelters.","authors":"Haruka Kobayashi,&nbsp;Noriko Sudo,&nbsp;Nobuyo Tsuboyama-Kasaoka,&nbsp;Ikuko Shimada,&nbsp;Keiichi Sato","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2023013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary goal was to evaluate the validity of food photographic estimation for nutritional assessment compared with weighed food record (WFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the validity and reproducibility of photographic estimation of foods provided in evacuation shelters. We analyzed 35 meals served at 12 shelters in Kumamoto Prefecture in Japan, affected by a heavy rain disaster in 2020. In this context, we compared 21 senior students' portion size estimation by food photographs to WFR. In addition, we assigned five meals for each of the 21 senior students, and the same meal photograph was estimated by three students to test reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was detected between the two methods regarding energy, the total grams of meal, the protein, and vitamins B<sub>1</sub>, B<sub>2</sub>, and C, except for salt. In addition, the students who never self-cooked underestimated the total grams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Food photographic estimation could simplify the nutritional assessment in evacuation shelters. However, unclear photographs and food items served by weight could weaken the estimation accuracy. According to previous studies and the applied postestimation questionnaire, photographs taken from specified angles and reference food photobooks for portion size estimation may improve accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"169-182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary goal was to evaluate the validity of food photographic estimation for nutritional assessment compared with weighed food record (WFR).

Methods: We evaluated the validity and reproducibility of photographic estimation of foods provided in evacuation shelters. We analyzed 35 meals served at 12 shelters in Kumamoto Prefecture in Japan, affected by a heavy rain disaster in 2020. In this context, we compared 21 senior students' portion size estimation by food photographs to WFR. In addition, we assigned five meals for each of the 21 senior students, and the same meal photograph was estimated by three students to test reproducibility.

Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between the two methods regarding energy, the total grams of meal, the protein, and vitamins B1, B2, and C, except for salt. In addition, the students who never self-cooked underestimated the total grams.

Conclusion: Food photographic estimation could simplify the nutritional assessment in evacuation shelters. However, unclear photographs and food items served by weight could weaken the estimation accuracy. According to previous studies and the applied postestimation questionnaire, photographs taken from specified angles and reference food photobooks for portion size estimation may improve accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

食品摄影评估在疏散避难所评估食物的有效性和可重复性。
目的:比较食品称重记录法(WFR)和食品照相法在营养评价中的有效性。方法:我们评估了在疏散避难所提供的食物的照片估计的有效性和再现性。我们分析了2020年受暴雨灾害影响的日本熊本县12个避难所提供的35份餐食。在此背景下,我们比较了21名高年级学生通过食物照片估计的份量和WFR。此外,我们为21名高年级学生每人分配了5顿饭,并由3名学生估计同一顿饭的照片以检验可重复性。结果:两种方法在能量、总膳食克数、蛋白质、维生素B1、B2、C等方面差异均无统计学意义(盐除外)。此外,从不自己煮的学生低估了总克数。结论:食物照相评价可简化避难场所的营养评价。然而,不清晰的照片和按重量提供的食物可能会削弱估计的准确性。根据以往的研究和应用后估计问卷,从特定角度拍摄的照片和参考食物相册可以提高份量估计的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信