[Optimal safety management procedures for medications with potent teratogenic properties: a prospective intervention cluster randomized non-inferiority comparative study].

Kenshi Suzuki, Tomoyuki Fujii, Takayuki Iriyama, Yasunori Sato, Toshikatsu Kawasaki, Kunihiko Hayashi, Kazushi Endo
{"title":"[Optimal safety management procedures for medications with potent teratogenic properties: a prospective intervention cluster randomized non-inferiority comparative study].","authors":"Kenshi Suzuki,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Fujii,&nbsp;Takayuki Iriyama,&nbsp;Yasunori Sato,&nbsp;Toshikatsu Kawasaki,&nbsp;Kunihiko Hayashi,&nbsp;Kazushi Endo","doi":"10.11406/rinketsu.64.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using the \"periodic confirmation sheet\" employed in the safety management procedure of thalidomide drugs, we looked at whether patients' knowledge of compliance with the procedure varies depending on the length of the gap between confirmations. In 31 centers, 215 participants were male patients and female patients who might be pregnant participants. Subjects have treated a group of patients who used periodic confirmation slips at the standard confirmation interval and a group of patients who increase the confirmation interval to 4 or 6 months, the % of respondents that correctly answered each of all six questions in questions 1-6 on the second comprehension questionnaire, excluding question 7 to confirm behavior change, was 87.0%. Comparing the percentage of correct answers to all questions the first time and the second time, no pregnancy cases were observed and there was no decline in the percentage of accurate responses after the second attempt for either group. One cannot judge changes in behavior. The mixed-effect model also additionally demonstrated non-inferiority in the patient group with the extended confirmation interval (a difference of -6.7% in the proportion of correct answers on the comprehension test (95%CI: -20.3-7.0%)), thus it appears that going forward, both male patients and female patients of potential pregnancy should complete the periodic confirmation form once every 4 or 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":6352,"journal":{"name":"[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology","volume":"64 3","pages":"175-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11406/rinketsu.64.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the "periodic confirmation sheet" employed in the safety management procedure of thalidomide drugs, we looked at whether patients' knowledge of compliance with the procedure varies depending on the length of the gap between confirmations. In 31 centers, 215 participants were male patients and female patients who might be pregnant participants. Subjects have treated a group of patients who used periodic confirmation slips at the standard confirmation interval and a group of patients who increase the confirmation interval to 4 or 6 months, the % of respondents that correctly answered each of all six questions in questions 1-6 on the second comprehension questionnaire, excluding question 7 to confirm behavior change, was 87.0%. Comparing the percentage of correct answers to all questions the first time and the second time, no pregnancy cases were observed and there was no decline in the percentage of accurate responses after the second attempt for either group. One cannot judge changes in behavior. The mixed-effect model also additionally demonstrated non-inferiority in the patient group with the extended confirmation interval (a difference of -6.7% in the proportion of correct answers on the comprehension test (95%CI: -20.3-7.0%)), thus it appears that going forward, both male patients and female patients of potential pregnancy should complete the periodic confirmation form once every 4 or 6 months.

[具有强致畸特性药物的最佳安全管理程序:一项前瞻性干预聚类随机非劣效性比较研究]。
使用沙利度胺药物安全管理程序中使用的“定期确认表”,我们观察患者对程序依从性的了解是否取决于确认间隔的长度。在31个中心,215名参与者是男性患者和可能怀孕的女性患者。在标准确认间隔使用定期确认卡的一组患者和将确认间隔增加到4个月或6个月的一组患者中,除确认行为改变的第7题外,第二次理解问卷1-6题中所有6个问题的答对率为87.0%。比较第一次和第二次所有问题的正确回答百分比,没有观察到怀孕的情况,并且在第二次尝试后,两组的准确回答百分比都没有下降。人们无法判断行为的变化。混合效应模型在确认间隔延长的患者组中也显示出非劣效性(理解测试的正确答案比例差异为-6.7% (95%CI: -20.3-7.0%)),因此,今后男性和女性潜在妊娠患者都应每4个月或6个月完成一次定期确认表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信