Peer providers and linkage with buprenorphine care after hospitalization: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Helen E Jack, Eric D Denisiuk, Brett A Collins, Dan Stephens, Kendra L Blalock, Jared W Klein, Elenore P Bhatraju, Joseph O Merrill, Kevin A Hallgren, Judith I Tsui
{"title":"Peer providers and linkage with buprenorphine care after hospitalization: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Helen E Jack, Eric D Denisiuk, Brett A Collins, Dan Stephens, Kendra L Blalock, Jared W Klein, Elenore P Bhatraju, Joseph O Merrill, Kevin A Hallgren, Judith I Tsui","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2022.2095078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are increasingly started on buprenorphine in the hospital, yet many patients do not attend outpatient buprenorphine care after discharge. Peer providers, people in recovery themselves, are a growing part of addiction care. We examine whether patients who received a low-intensity, peer-delivered intervention during hospitalization had a greater rate of linking with outpatient buprenorphine care relative to those not seen by a peer. <i>Methods</i>: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with OUD who were started on buprenorphine during hospitalization. The primary outcome was receipt of a buprenorphine prescription within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included attendance at a follow-up visit with a buprenorphine provider within 30 days and hospital readmission within 90 days. Modified Poisson regression analyses tested for differences in the rate ratios (RR) of each binary outcome for patients who were versus were not seen by a peer provider. Peer notes in the electronic health record were reviewed to characterize peer activities. <i>Results</i>: 111 patients met the study inclusion criteria, 31.5% of whom saw a peer provider. 55.0% received a buprenorphine prescription within 30 days of hospital discharge. Patients with versus without peer provider encounters did not significantly differ in the rates of receiving a buprenorphine prescription (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.74-1.51), hospital readmission (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.80-2.64), or attendance at a buprenorphine follow-up visit (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.68-1.57). Peers most often listened to or shared experiences with patients (68.6% of encounters) and helped facilitate medical care (60.0% of encounters). <i>Conclusions</i>: There were no differences in multiple measures of buprenorphine follow-up between patients who received this low-intensity peer intervention and those who did not. There is need to investigate what elements of peer provider programs contribute to patient outcomes and what outcomes should be assessed when evaluating peer programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":"43 1","pages":"1308-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586121/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2022.2095078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are increasingly started on buprenorphine in the hospital, yet many patients do not attend outpatient buprenorphine care after discharge. Peer providers, people in recovery themselves, are a growing part of addiction care. We examine whether patients who received a low-intensity, peer-delivered intervention during hospitalization had a greater rate of linking with outpatient buprenorphine care relative to those not seen by a peer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with OUD who were started on buprenorphine during hospitalization. The primary outcome was receipt of a buprenorphine prescription within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included attendance at a follow-up visit with a buprenorphine provider within 30 days and hospital readmission within 90 days. Modified Poisson regression analyses tested for differences in the rate ratios (RR) of each binary outcome for patients who were versus were not seen by a peer provider. Peer notes in the electronic health record were reviewed to characterize peer activities. Results: 111 patients met the study inclusion criteria, 31.5% of whom saw a peer provider. 55.0% received a buprenorphine prescription within 30 days of hospital discharge. Patients with versus without peer provider encounters did not significantly differ in the rates of receiving a buprenorphine prescription (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.74-1.51), hospital readmission (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.80-2.64), or attendance at a buprenorphine follow-up visit (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.68-1.57). Peers most often listened to or shared experiences with patients (68.6% of encounters) and helped facilitate medical care (60.0% of encounters). Conclusions: There were no differences in multiple measures of buprenorphine follow-up between patients who received this low-intensity peer intervention and those who did not. There is need to investigate what elements of peer provider programs contribute to patient outcomes and what outcomes should be assessed when evaluating peer programs.

住院后同行提供者与丁丙诺啡护理的联系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:越来越多的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者在医院开始使用丁丙诺啡,但许多患者在出院后不参加丁丙诺啡门诊护理。同伴提供者,也就是自己正在康复的人,在成瘾治疗中扮演着越来越重要的角色。我们研究了在住院期间接受低强度、同伴提供干预的患者是否比没有同伴看到的患者与门诊丁丙诺啡护理的联系率更高。方法:这是一项对住院期间开始服用丁丙诺啡的成人OUD患者的回顾性队列研究。主要结局是出院后30天内接受丁丙诺啡处方。次要结果包括在30天内与丁丙诺啡提供者进行随访,并在90天内再次住院。修正泊松回归分析测试了有与未见过同行医生的患者的每个二元结果的比率比(RR)的差异。审查了电子健康记录中的同伴笔记,以确定同伴活动的特征。结果:111例患者符合研究纳入标准,其中31.5%的患者就诊于同行医师。55.0%的患者在出院30天内获得丁丙诺啡处方。接受丁丙诺啡处方(RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.74-1.51)、再入院(RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.80-2.64)或参加丁丙诺啡随访(RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.68-1.57)的患者与未与同行提供者接触的患者在这方面没有显著差异。同伴最常倾听或与患者分享经验(68.6%的遭遇),并帮助促进医疗护理(60.0%的遭遇)。结论:接受这种低强度同伴干预的患者与未接受这种低强度同伴干预的患者在丁丙诺啡随访的多项指标上没有差异。有必要调查同伴提供者项目的哪些要素对患者的结果有贡献,以及在评估同伴项目时应该评估哪些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信