{"title":"Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast: Clinical evaluation.","authors":"Ahmet Cem Esmer, Deniz Tazeoglu, Ahmet Dag","doi":"10.3233/BD-220070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia is a rare benign breast stromal proliferative lesion of the breast. Clinical presentation ranges from rapidly growing mass to incidental identification in routine screening. This difference in manifestation and its rarity makes it difficult to be a standard treatment protocol. Therefore, we aimed to share our clinical experience in Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The files of patients who underwent core biopsy or surgical excision due to a breast mass and resulted in pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia between January 2013 and December 2021 were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 patients with a median age of 37 (22-68) were found Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia confirmed by surgical excision or core biopsy. Chosen treatment option was observation in 8 patients (47.1%), while surgical excision was used in 9 (52.9%) patients. The mean follow-up period was 55.24 ± 26.72 (13-102) months. None of the patients observed the Malignant transformation during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia of the breast, surgical excision with clean margins or close follow-up after diagnosis confirmation by tissue biopsy is sufficient. Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia is not a risk factor for developing breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9224,"journal":{"name":"Breast disease","volume":"42 1","pages":"115-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-220070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia is a rare benign breast stromal proliferative lesion of the breast. Clinical presentation ranges from rapidly growing mass to incidental identification in routine screening. This difference in manifestation and its rarity makes it difficult to be a standard treatment protocol. Therefore, we aimed to share our clinical experience in Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia.
Methods: The files of patients who underwent core biopsy or surgical excision due to a breast mass and resulted in pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia between January 2013 and December 2021 were included in the study.
Results: 17 patients with a median age of 37 (22-68) were found Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia confirmed by surgical excision or core biopsy. Chosen treatment option was observation in 8 patients (47.1%), while surgical excision was used in 9 (52.9%) patients. The mean follow-up period was 55.24 ± 26.72 (13-102) months. None of the patients observed the Malignant transformation during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: For Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia of the breast, surgical excision with clean margins or close follow-up after diagnosis confirmation by tissue biopsy is sufficient. Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia is not a risk factor for developing breast cancer.
期刊介绍:
The recent expansion of work in the field of breast cancer inevitably will hasten discoveries that will have impact on patient outcome. The breadth of this research that spans basic science, clinical medicine, epidemiology, and public policy poses difficulties for investigators. Not only is it necessary to be facile in comprehending ideas from many disciplines, but also important to understand the public implications of these discoveries. Breast Disease publishes review issues devoted to an in-depth analysis of the scientific and public implications of recent research on a specific problem in breast cancer. Thus, the reviews will not only discuss recent discoveries but will also reflect on their impact in breast cancer research or clinical management.